不同经营目标下考虑质量水平的供应链定价博弈研究
Research on Supply Chain Pricing Game Considering Quality Level under Different Business Objectives
摘要: 为了解决两个具有竞争关系的制造商和一个零售商构成的两级供应链的定价问题,研究在不同策略下质量水平对定价决策的影响,构建了不同经营目标下供应链的定价决策模型。运用Stackelberg博弈求出了该模型的最优定价与最优利润,并数值模拟了质量水平对批发价、零售价的影响。结果表明:以自身利润为经营目标策略下的批发价、零售价高于以相对利润为经营目标策略下的批发价、零售价;两种策略下,两制造商在以自身利润为经营目标策略下的利润较高,而零售商在以相对利润为经营目标策略下的利润较高。
Abstract: In order to solve the pricing problem of two-level supply chain composed of two competitive man-ufacturers and one retailer, the influence of quality level on pricing decision under different strategies is studied, and the pricing decision model of supply chain under different business ob-jectives is constructed. The optimal pricing and optimal profit of the model are obtained by Stackelberg game, and the impact of quality level on wholesale price and retail price is numerically simulated. The results show that the wholesale price and retail price under the strategy of its own profit are higher than the wholesale price and retail price under the strategy of relative profit. Under the two strategies, two manufacturers’ profit is higher under the strategy of their own profit and the retailer's profit under the strategy of relative profit is higher.
文章引用:李爱梅, 张芳. 不同经营目标下考虑质量水平的供应链定价博弈研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2018, 8(3): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2018.83014

参考文献

[1] Maiti, T. and Giri, B.C. (2017) Two-Way Product Recovery in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Variable Markup under Price and Quality Dependent Demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 259-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Li, T. and Ma, J.H. (2015) Complexity Analysis of Dual-Channel Game Model with Different Managers’ Business Objectives. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 20, 199-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Elsadany, A.A. (2017) Dynamics of a Cournot Duopoly Game with Bounded Rationality Based on Relative Profit Maximization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 294, 253-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chen, J.X., et al. (2017) Price and Quality Decisions in Dual-Channel Supply Chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 935-948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Xie, Y., Tai, A.H., Ching, W.K., et al. (2016) Pricing Strategy for a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Optimized Return Effort Level. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 185-195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Giri, B.C., Chakraborty, A. and Maiti, T. (2015) Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Multi-Manufacturer Competition. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 78, 1927-1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 张铁柱, 刘志勇, 滕春贤, 等. 基于二层规划的供应链定价决策研究[J]. 控制与决策, 2005, 20(9): 992-995.
[8] Zhao, J., Hou, X., Guo, Y., et al. (2017) Pricing Policies for Complementary Products in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 49, 437-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Banker, R.D., Khosla, I. and Sinha, K.K. (1998) Quality and Competition. Management Science, 44, 1179-1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Tsay, A.A. and Agrawal, N. (2000) Channel Dynamics under Price and Service Competition. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2, 372-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Moorthy, K.S. (1988) Product and Price Competition in a Du-opoly. Marketing Science, 7, 141-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Gibbons, R. and Murphy, K.J. (1990) Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43, 30S-51S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Hattori, M. and Tanaka, Y. (2014) Incentive for Adoption of New Technology in Duopoly under Absolute and Relative Profit Maximization. Economics Bulletin, 34, 2051-2059.
[14] Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. and Cato, S. (2013) Competitionveness and R&D Competition Re-visited. Economic Modelling, 31, 541-547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Tanaka, Y. (2013) Irrelevance of the Choice of Strategic Variables in Duopoly under Relative Profit. Economics & Business Letters, 2, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef