原发性干燥综合征患者干眼临床特点分析
The Clinical Analysis of Dry Eye in Patients with Primary Sj?gren’s Syndrome
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2018.86097, PDF,   
作者: 徐玲娟, 王 玮, 李新宇, 李贵刚, 周雄武:华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院眼科,湖北 武汉
关键词: 干燥综合征干眼临床特点泪膜破裂时间Primary Sj?gren’s Syndrome Dry Eye Clinical Characteristics Break-Up Time
摘要: 目的:以普通干眼患者为对照,分析原发性干燥综合征(primary Sjögren’s syndrome, pSS)患者干眼的临床特点。方法:2013年12月至2014年7月,由我院风湿内科诊断为pSS的患者30例,对患者进行病史询问并行角膜荧光素染色、BUT、Schimer I test (SIT)检查。同时随机选择此时间段内就诊的年龄、性别与之相匹配的普通干眼患者,行角膜荧光素染色、BUT检查并对结果进行分析。结果:30例pSS患者中,女性患者27例(90%)。患者右眼BUT (1.53 ± 0.63) s,左眼BUT(0.77 ± 0.43) s,双眼BUT结果有统计学差异(P = 0.000)。30例普通干眼患者右眼BUT (2.87 ± 0.94) s,左眼BUT(3.30 ± 0.95) s,双眼BUT结果无统计学差异(P = 0.081)。pSS患者与普通干眼患者相比,双眼BUT结果均存在统计学差异(P = 0.000)。pSS患者中,SIT结果 ≤ 5 mm/5min的有49眼(81.7%)。双眼SIT结果差异有统计学意义(P = 0.019),双眼的BUT与SIT结果没有相关性(右眼P = 0.848,左眼P = 0.063)。结论:pSS患者女性多于男性,患者眼部症状与普通干眼患者无明显差异,主要为眼干、异物感,但pSS患者中近一半患者合并口干。与普通干眼患者不同,pSS患者双眼的干眼程度有差异,且双眼的BUT与SIT均无相关性。相同年龄段内,pSS患者的BUT较普通干眼患者更短。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of dry eyes in patients with primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (pSS). Methods: 30 cases of pSS patients which were diagnosed by the Department of Rheumatology from December 2013 to July 2014 were included in this study. The medical history and symptoms were recorded. The break-up time (BUT) and Schirmer I test (SIT) were operated by one doctor and the results were collected. At the same time, 30 age and sex-matched common dry eye patients were selected, and the BUT and SIT were operated by the same doctor. Results: 27 (90%) of the 30 pSS patients were female. The average BUT of the right eye was (1.53 ± 0.63) s and the left eye was (0.77 ± 0.43) s. There was a statistical difference between the results of BUT results of the binoculus (P = 0.000). For the 30 patients with ordinary dry eyes, the mean BUT of the right eye was (2.87 ± 0.94) s and the left was (3.30 ± 0.95) s. There is no statistically significant difference between the binoculus (P = 0.081). Statistical differences were found for both eyes among patients with pSS and ordinary dry eyes (P = 0.000). 49 eyes (81.7%) of the pSS patients had SIT results ≤ 5 mm/5min. There was a statistical difference between SIT results of both eyes (P = 0.019). No significant correlations were found between the results of SIT and BUT in both eyes (P = 0.848 in right eyes and P = 0.063 in left eyes). Conclusions: There were more female pSS patients than male pSS patients, and their symptoms of the eyes were not significantly different from those of ordinary dry eye patients. Dry eyes and foreign body sensation were the common symptoms of these patients. However, nearly half of pSS patients had dry mouth. Different from the ordinary dry eye patients, dry eyes differ in severity in both eyes for pSS patients. And there were no significant correlations between the results of SIT and BUT in both eyes. pSS patients had shorter BUT than ordinary dry eye patients in the same age group. 
文章引用:徐玲娟, 王玮, 李新宇, 李贵刚, 周雄武. 原发性干燥综合征患者干眼临床特点分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2018, 8(6): 580-584. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2018.86097

参考文献

[1] (2007) The Definition and Classification of Dry Eye Disease: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). The Ocular Surface, 5, 75-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Xuan, J., Shen, L., Malyavantham, K., et al. (2013) Temporal Histological Changes in Lacrimal and Major Salivary Glands in Mouse Models of Sjogren’s Syndrome. BMC Oral Health, 13, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 冯学兵, 张华勇, 周康兴, 等. 初诊原发性干燥综合征86例临床研究[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2009(13): 44-47.
[4] Shiboski, S.C., Shiboski, C.H., Criswell, L., et al. (2012) American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Sjogren’s Syndrome: A Data-Driven, Expert Consensus Approach in the Sjogren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Cohort. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 64, 475-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组. 干眼临床诊疗专家共识(2013年) [J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2013(49): 73-75.
[6] Tincani, A., Andreoli, L., Cavazzana, I., et al. (2013) Novel Aspects of Sjogren’s Syndrome in 2012. BMC Medicine, 11, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 徐志蓉, 陈飞, 姜发纲, 等. 干燥综合征型干眼患者生命质量研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2010: 280-282.
[8] Inal, V., Kitapcioglu, G., Karabulut, G., et al. (2010) Evaluation of Quality of Life in Relation to Anxiety and Depression in Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome. Modern Rheumatology, 20, 588-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Qin, B., Wang, J., Yang, Z., et al. (2015) Epidemiology of Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74, 1983-1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Nelson, J.D., Craig, J.P., Akpek, E.K., et al. (2017) TFOS DEWS II Introduction. The Ocular Surface, 15, 269-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Craig, J.P., Nichols, K.K., Akpek, E.K., et al. (2017) TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. The Ocular Surface, 15, 276-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Tsubota, K., Yokoi, N., Shimazaki, J., et al. (2017) New Perspec-tives on Dry Eye Definition and Diagnosis: A Consensus Report by the Asia Dry Eye Society. The Ocular Surface, 15, 65-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 陈梅卿, 李燕, 刘晓燕, 等. 原发性干燥综合征患者周围神经病变临床分析[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2014(18): 455-459.
[14] Sullivan, B.D., Crews, L.A., Messmer, E.M., et al. (2014) Correlations between Commonly Used Objective Signs and Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease: Clinical Implications. Acta Ophthalmologica, 92, 161-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] de A. F. Gomes, B., Santhiago, M.R., de Azevedo, M.N., et al. (2012) Evaluation of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 250, 1051-1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 吴元, 荣蓓, 晏晓明. 干燥综合征患者眼部症状和体征的一致性分析[J]. 眼科, 2010(19): 170-173.
[17] Lee, S.Y., Han, S.J., Nam, S.M., et al. (2013) Analysis of Tear Cytokines and Clinical Correlations in Sjogren Syndrome Dry Eye Patients and Non-Sjogren Syndrome Dry Eye Patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 156, 247-253.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]