不同覆盖物对甘薯品种产量和品质的影响
Effects of Different Mulching Materials on Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2018.88139, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 鄢 铮*, 彭 琼, 张小红:福州市农业科学研究所,福建 福州
关键词: 甘薯覆盖物产量品质Sweet Potato Mulching Yield Quality
摘要: 栽培过程中采用黑膜、白膜和稻草进行覆盖,测定了甘薯产量及薯块营养指标,并对其进行相关性分析,旨在筛选出甘薯栽培的最佳覆盖方式,为生产优质高产的甘薯提供理论依据。结果表明:1) 覆盖黑膜的处理产量最高,其次为白膜、草,这3个处理均显著高于对照,分别比对照增产30.14%、21.92%和12.33%;2) 甘薯产量与干物率、维生素C、蔗糖、还原糖等有一定的相关性,但均不显著;3) 薯块干物率与维生素C呈极显著负相关(−0.99**),与还原糖呈极显著正相关(0.96**),维生素C与还原糖呈极显著负相关(−0.98**),与蔗糖呈显著负相关(−0.91*),还原糖与蔗糖呈极显著正相关(0.97**)。本试验认为,生产上宜选用黑膜作为覆盖物,可提高甘薯产量和品质。
Abstract: Using black plastic film, white plastic film and straw as the mulching during cultivation, the yield and nutrient index of sweet potato were tested, and the correlation analysis was carried out to screen out the best mulching method for sweet potato cultivation and provide theoretical basis for the production of sweet potato with high quality and high yield. The results showed that: 1) The yield of the treatment with the black plastic film mulching was the highest, followed by the white plastic film treatment and the straw treatment. And the yield of these three treatments was higher than that of the control, which increased by 30.14%, 21.92% and 12.33%, respectively. 2) There is a certain correlation between sweet potato yield and dry matter rate, vitamin C, sucrose and reducing sugar, but not significant. 3) The dry matter rate of sweet potato had an extremely significant negative correlation with vitamin C (−0.99**), and an extremely significant positive correlation with reducing sugar (0.96**). Additionally, vitamin C had an extremely significant negative correlation with reducing sugar (−0.98**), and a significant negative correlation with sucrose (−0.91*). Moreover, reducing sugar had an extremely significant positive correlation with sucrose (0.97**). According to the experimental results in this study, it is regarded to be more dependable to choose black plastic film as the mulching in production, which could improve the yield and quality of sweet potato.
文章引用:鄢铮, 彭琼, 张小红. 不同覆盖物对甘薯品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2018, 8(8): 948-953. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2018.88139

参考文献

[1] 江燕, 史春余, 王振振, 等. 地膜覆盖对耕层土壤温度水分和甘薯产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(6): 627-634.
[2] 辛国胜, 林祖军, 韩俊杰, 等. 黑色地膜对甘薯生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 6(15): 233-237.
[3] 李江辉, 贾峥嵘, 王凌云, 等. 甘薯垄作覆膜的增温保墒效果及其对产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(4): 494-497.
[4] 袁明杰, 刘学未. 麦秸覆盖还田技术在甘薯种植中的应用[J]. 河北农业科技, 2003(5): 8.
[5] 陈红, 王廷利, 陈立涛. 夏甘薯覆盖麦糠草试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(12): 162-164.
[6] 中国科学院上海植物生理研究所, 上海植物生理学会. 现代植物生理学实验指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[7] 陈发炜, 赵建国, 单明亮, 等. 山区覆膜甘薯增产原理与高产开发技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2001(6): 5-6.
[8] 姜成选, 张学芝, 马京波, 等. 春甘薯覆膜栽培增产因素的研究[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 2002, 19(3): 176-179.
[9] 王茂勇, 王旭芳, 李金荣. 脱毒甘薯覆膜高产栽培技术[J]. 作物杂志, 2005(3): 48-49.
[10] 于文东, 于坤令, 姜成选, 等. 地膜覆盖对甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2003(1): 18-20.
[11] 马志民, 刘兰服, 姚海兰, 等. 地膜覆盖对甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 西北农学报, 2012, 21(5): 103-107.
[12] 兰孟焦, 吴问胜, 潘浩, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对土壤温度和甘薯产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(1): 104-105.
[13] 苏文瑾, 雷剑, 王连军, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对淀粉型和紫色甘薯生长发育的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(22): 5417-5420.
[14] 付文娥, 刘明慧, 王钊, 等. 覆膜栽培对甘薯生长动态及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(7): 107-113.
[15] 李云, 宋吉轩, 石乔龙. 覆膜对甘薯生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(8): 1124-1128.
[16] 辛国胜, 林祖军, 韩俊杰, 等. 黑色地膜对甘薯生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15): 233-237.
[17] 林汝湘, 谢春生, 冯祖虾, 等. 我国南方甘薯品种资源部分营养成分分析研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1995, 28(4): 39-45.