不同生物炭菌肥对绿豆农艺性状及土壤成分的研究
Study on Soil Composition and Agronomic Characters of Mung Bean by Different Biochar Bacterial Fertilizer
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2018.89148, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李成璞*, 张 扬, 邢占民, 尹 鑫, 李嘉琪, 温耀庭:承德市农林科学院,河北 承德
关键词: 生物炭菌肥绿豆产量土壤改良Biochar Bacterial Fertilizer Mung Bean Yield Soil Improvement
摘要: 通过田间试验,一次性施入竹制生物炭来源的不同组成成分的生物炭菌肥,研究其对绿豆生长、农艺性状、产量及土壤成分的影响,为绿豆有机种植及土壤改良的应用提供科学依据。不同生物炭菌肥设4个处理,3次重复,肥料用量设置分别为:1) 对照:不使用任何肥料。2) 处理1:100%竹炭粉:4500 kg/hm2。3) 处理2:竹炭土壤改良剂:3450 kg/hm2。4) 处理3:竹炭生物有机肥:2250 kg/hm2。2017年对绿豆进行田间试验,调查生长期的农艺性状及收获时测定产量,同时采集播种前及收获后各小区的土壤样本测定PH值、有机质、速效氮、速效钾、有机磷、铁、水溶性盐含量。研究结果表明,不同配方的生物炭菌肥收获后对土壤成分的变化如下:处理3中可提高PH值0.2单位,其他处理无差别;有机质含量处理2 < 对照 < 处理3 < 处理1;速效氮处理3 < 处理2 < 对照 < 处理1;速效钾处理3 < 处理2 = 对照 < 处理1;有效磷对照 < 处理2 < 处理3 < 处理1。处理1、处理2的绿豆产量较对照减产15%~16%,处理3较对照增产16%。不同处理的株高、株荚数都较处理1有所增长。因此,一次性施入生物炭能有效减缓有机质、速效氮、速效钾含量的减少;一次性施入生物炭菌肥能够增加株高、株荚数及产量,降低第一开花位置高度。
Abstract: Through field experiments, biochar bacterial fertilizer with different components from bamboo bi-ochar was applied in one time to study its effects on the growth, agronomic characters, yield and soil composition of mung bean, providing a scientific basis for organic planting of mung bean and the application of soil improvement. 4 treatments were used for different biochar bacterial fertilizers, 3 times repeated, and fertilizer dosage was set as: 1) CK: no fertilizer was used; 2) treatment of 1:100% bamboo charcoal powder: 4500 kg/hm2 3) treatment of 2 bamboo charcoal soil conditioner: 3450 kg/hm2 4) treatment of 3 bamboo charcoal bio-organic fertilizer: 2250 kg/hm2. Field experiments were conducted on mung bean in 2017 to investigate agronomic characters of growing period and determine yield at harvest time. Meanwhile, soil samples from each community before and after planting were collected to determine PH value, organic matter, quick-acting nitrogen, quick-acting potassium, organophosphorus, iron and water-soluble salt content. The results show that the changes of soil composition after harvest of biochar bacterial fertilizers with different formulations are as follows: the PH value can be increased by 0.2 unit in treatment 3, and there is no difference in other treatments. Organic matter content treatment 2 < CK < treatment 3 < treatment 1; quick-acting nitrogen treatment 3 < treatment 2 < CK < treatment 1; quick-acting potassium treatment 3 < treatment 2 = CK < treatment 1; organophosphorus CK < treatment 2 < treatment 3 < treatment 1. The yield of mung bean treated 1 and 2 decreased by 15% - 16% compared with CK, and the yield of 16% increased by 3 compared with CK. The plant height and pod number of different treatments were all higher than that of treatment 1. Therefore, one-time application of biochar can effectively slow down the reduction of organic matter, quick-acting nitrogen and quick-acting potassium. One-time application of biochar bacterial fertilizer could increase plant height, plant pod number and yield, and reduce the height of first flowering.
文章引用:李成璞, 张扬, 邢占民, 尹鑫, 李嘉琪, 温耀庭. 不同生物炭菌肥对绿豆农艺性状及土壤成分的研究[J]. 农业科学, 2018, 8(9): 1015-1023. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2018.89148

参考文献

[1] 代快, 计思贵, 张立猛, 等. 生物炭对云南典型植烟土壤持水性及烤烟产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4): 44-51.
[2] Lehmann, J. (2007) Bio-Energy in the Black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 381-387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhang, A., Cui, L., Pan, G., et al. (2010) Effect of Biochar Amendment on Yield and Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Rice Paddy from Tai Lake Plain, China. Agriculture, Ecosys-tems & Environment, 139, 469-475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 刘玉学, 王耀锋, 吕豪豪, 等. 不同稻秆炭和竹炭施用水平对小青菜产量、品质以及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013(19): 1438-1444.
[5] 卜晓丽, 薛建辉. 生物炭对土壤生境及植物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(3): 535-540.
[6] 宋大利, 习向银, 黄绍敏, 等. 秸秆生物炭配施氮肥对潮土土壤碳氮含量及作物产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 369-379.
[7] 房彬, 李心清, 赵斌, 等. 生物炭对旱作农田土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(8): 1292-1297.
[8] 尚杰, 耿增超, 陈心想, 等. 施用生物炭对旱作农田土壤有机碳、氮及其组分的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(3): 509-517.
[9] 刘园, Jamal, K.M., 靳海洋, 等. 秸秆生物炭对潮土作物产量和土壤性状的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 849-858.
[10] 唐光木, 葛春辉, 徐万里, 等. 施用生物黑炭对新疆灰漠土肥力与玉米生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(9): 1797-1802.
[11] 赵倩雯, 孟军, 陈温福. 生物炭对大白菜幼苗生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(12): 2394-2401.
[12] 赵倩雯. 生物炭对大白菜幼苗生长及根肿病的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.
[13] 陈磊. 宿迁市肥料市场监管的思考[J]. 农村科学实验, 2018(1): 113-113.
[14] Zwieten, L.V., Kimber, S., Morris, S., et al. (2010) Effects of Biochar from Slow Pyrolysis of Papermill Waste on Agronomic Performance and Soil Fertility. Plant & Soil, 327, 235-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Yuan, J.-H. and Xu, R.-K. (2015) The Amelioration Effects of Low Temperature Biochar Generated from Nine Crop Residues on an Acidic Ultisol. Soil Use & Management, 27, 110-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 韩光明. 生物炭对不同类型土壤理化性质和微生物多样性的影响[D]: [博士学位论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2013.
[17] 傅秋华, 张文标, 钟泰林. 竹炭对土壤性质和高羊茅生长的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(2): 159-163.
[18] 郭伟, 陈红霞, 张庆忠, 等. 华北高产农田施用生物炭对耕层土壤总氮和碱解氮含量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(3): 425-428.
[19] 丁平, 潘超美, 徐鸿华. 不同生物有机肥料对巴戟天主要有效成分的影响[J]. 现代中药研究与实践, 2003, 17(4): 21-22.
[20] 刘新源, 刘国顺, 刘宏恩, 等. 生物炭施用量对烟叶生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(2): 58-62.
[21] 张伟明, 孟军, 王嘉宇, 等. 生物炭对水稻根系形态与生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(8): 1445-1451.
[22] 陈屯想, 何绪生, 耿增超, 等. 生物炭对不同土壤化学性质、小麦和糜子产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 33(20): 6534-6542.
[23] 张娜, 李佳, 刘学欢, 等. 生物炭对夏玉米生长和产量的影响阴[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(8): 1569-1574.
[24] 刘明, 来永才, 李巧, 等. 生物炭与氮肥施用量对大豆生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(1): 87-92.
[25] 王光飞, 马艳, 郭德杰, 等. 不同用量秸秆生物炭对辣椒疫病防控效果及土壤性状的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 51(1): 204-215.
[26] 袁业琴, 张富萍. 浅谈微生物肥料在绿色食品生产上的作用[J]. 农业与技术, 2007, 27(2): 80-81.
[27] 刘戈, 易玉林. 微生物肥料的发展现状与前景展望[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(11): 3318-3322.
[28] 周巍. 微生物肥在蔬菜生产上的应用[J]. 现代农业, 2015(9): 37-38.
[29] 李振高, 洛永明, 腾英. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.