信息主义法学论纲
An Outline of the Informatization Jurisprudence
摘要:
整个法学领域的基本工作,立法与裁判,都是人类信息产品的创造,是职业法学工作者的智力劳动。尽管其中可能涉及物质财产,个人躯体等自然科学的研究对象,但那属于法学与其他学科在边缘区域的交叉。法学的基础学科和主干学科不属于自然科学而属于社会科学,不属于物质科学而属于信息科学。基于这样的学科定位,我们提出:随着法学的信息科学化,贯彻“信息主义”的时代精神,建立“信息主义法学”已经迫在眉睫;本文较详细地分析信息主义法学产生的背景,提出它的基本假设(“生理–心理人假说”),讨论它的若干基本范畴。
The basic works of the whole field of law, the legislation and the judgment, are the creation of the human information products and the intellectual labor of the professional law workers. Although they may involve the targets of natural science such as material property and personal body, the targets belong to the intersection of jurisprudence and other disciplines in the marginal area. The basic subject and main subjects of law do not belong to natural science but to social science, not belong to material science but to information science. According to this subject orientation, we propose that along with the subject informatization of law, the tasks of the implementation of the “informationalism” spirit in our society and of the establishment of “Informatization jurisprudence” are imminent. This thesis at large analyzes the background of emerging of Informatization jurisprudence, puts forward its basic assumption (“the hypothesis of physiological and psychological man”), and discuses some fundamental categories.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李宗荣, 等. 信息心理学: 背景、精要及应用[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2017.
|
|
[2]
|
李宗荣. 理论信息学概论[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2010.
|
|
[3]
|
S.E.斯通普夫, J.菲泽. 西方哲学史[M]. 第七版. 北京: 中华书局, 2006: 267.
|
|
[4]
|
张文显. 法理学[M]. 第四版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 高等教育出版社, 2013.
|
|
[5]
|
苗金春. 法理学导论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012.
|
|
[6]
|
马克思. 马克思恩格斯全集(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 121.
|
|
[7]
|
杨显滨. 论自然法学与实证主义法学的互动融合[J]. 河北法学, 2012, 30(9): 157-162.
|
|
[8]
|
E.博登海默. 法理学: 法律哲学与法律方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998.
|