SQ8与其他列车混编纵向冲动仿真分析
Simulation Analysis of Longitudinal Impulse for SQ8 Mixed with Other Vehicle
摘要: SQ8是一种新型铁路车辆,它与其他车辆在结构上有较大的差异,混编时可能出现较大的列车纵向冲动,进而危害到货物的运输安全。因此,本文采用列车空气制动和纵向动力学联合仿真系统(TABLDSS),仿真分析了SQ8与其他车辆混编后制动能力和纵向冲动水平。结果表明,当SQ8列车分别混编入SQ6列车首尾位置时,他们的最大车钩力与SQ6单编时基本一致。两种混编方式下的紧急制动距离变化6米、3米。当SQ8列车分别编入C70列车首中尾部时,三种编组方式下的最大车钩力都比C70单编时小,最大差值达到了204.7 kN,此时SQ8列车位于混编列车尾部。当SQ8列车位于混编列车中部位置时车钩力最大。三种混编方式下的紧急制动距离分别为1231米、1217米、1204米,比C70单编列车制动距离略长。综上所述,SQ8与SQ6可以无条件混编,与C70车混编时SQ8车辆位于尾部位置较佳。
Abstract: SQ8 is a new type of railway vehicle, which is quite different from other rolling stock in structure. It may cause great longitudinal impulse when mixed with other vehicle and then damage the transport safety of the goods. Therefore, simulation analysis of the mixed train on braking and longitudinal impulse is carried out with TABLDSS in this article. The result shows that their maximum coupler force is almost the same with the SQ6 single train when several SQ8 are mixed into the first and the rear position of the SQ6. The emergency braking distance of the two kinds of mixed mode changes 6 m, 3 m respectively. The maximum coupler force of the three mixed modes that several SQ8 are mixed in the head, middle and tail of the C70 respectively is smaller than the C70 unit train’s. SQ8 is located in the rear of the mixed train when the maximum difference is up to 204.7 kN. The largest coupler force appears when the SQ8 is mixed in the middle of the C70. The emergency braking distance of the three mixed modes is 1231 m, 1217 m and 1204 m respectively, which is longer than C70 unit train’s. In summary, SQ8 can be mixed with SQ6 in no condition while it’s better to be located in the rear position when mixed with C70.
文章引用:葛晓, 魏伟. SQ8与其他列车混编纵向冲动仿真分析[J]. 交通技术, 2018, 7(5): 310-318. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJTT.2018.75038

参考文献

[1] Cole, C., Spiryagin, M., Wu, Q. and Sun, Y.Q. (2017) Modelling, Simulation and Applications of Longitudinal Train Dynamics. International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 55, 1498-1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Aboubakr, A.K., Volpi, M., Shabana, A.A., et al. (2016) Implementation of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brake Formulation in longitudinal Train Dynamics Algorithms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part K Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics, 230, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ansari, M (2009) Longitudinal Dynamics of Freight Trains. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 16, 102-131.
[4] 范佩鑫. 重载列车牵引、调速及紧急制动的纵向力——大秦线万吨列车试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 1994, 29(1): 57-64.
[5] 杜念博. 制动特性对列车纵向冲动影响及优化分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连交通大学, 2012: 21-47.
[6] 魏伟, 赵旭宝, 姜岩. 列车空气制动与纵向动力学集成仿真[J]. 铁道学报, 2012, 34(4): 39-46.
[7] 魏伟, 于海龙. 制动特性对总在列车纵向冲动影响的比较[J]. 大连交通大学学报, 2013, 34(4): 1-6.
[8] 魏伟, 武星宇. 制动特性对列车纵向冲动的影响[J]. 大连交通大学学报, 2012, 33(2): 1-5.
[9] 杨亮亮, 傅茂海, 曾文昌, 周尚书. 基于纵向冲动的混编货物列车编组方案研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2015, 36(4): 108-114.
[10] 陈海啸, 魏伟. 快捷与普通货车混编列车纵向动力学仿真分析[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2017, 37(4): 60-65.
[11] 魏伟. 列车空气制动系统数值仿真[J]. 铁道学报, 2003, 25(1): 38-42.
[12] 黄十周, 盛震风. SQ6型运输汽车专用车单车实验意外紧急制动的研究[J]. 铁道车辆, 2013, 51(10): 10-13.