试论《物道主义形而上下学》的哲学范式意义
On the Significance of Philosophical Paradigm in Metaphysic-Physics of Wudaoism
DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2018.73007, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 贺方刚:湖北民族学院,湖北 恩施
关键词: 物道主义哲学范式转变Wudaoism Philosophical Paradigm Transformation
摘要: 高懿德教授的《物道主义形而上下学》所提出的从“物→道→人”的哲学致思顺序,是对以往哲学致思所遵循的由“人→道→物”的顺序之颠覆,颇有“哥白尼式”哲学革命之振聋发聩的效果,值得学界深思。其对哲学研究范式的转变,以及对哲学开端的再思考,皆蕴含着重要的理论价值和深刻的实践意义。
Abstract: The “things→dao→human” order of philosophical thoughts proposed by professor Gao Yide in Metaphysic-Physics of Wudaoism is a subversion of the order of “human→dao→things” followed by philosophical thoughts in the past, which has a remarkable effect of “Copernican” philosophical revolution. The transformation of philosophical research paradigm and the rethinking of philo-sophical beginning all contain important theoretical value and profound practical significance.
文章引用:贺方刚. 试论《物道主义形而上下学》的哲学范式意义[J]. 哲学进展, 2018, 7(3): 35-38. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2018.73007

参考文献

[1] 高懿德. 物道主义形而上下学[M]. 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 2016: 133-157.
[2] [美]托马斯•库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
[3] [德]海德格尔. 同一与差异[M]. 孙周兴, 陈小文, 余明锋, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2011.
[4] 王庆节. 海德格尔与哲学的开端[M]. 北京: 生活•读书•新知三联书店, 2015.
[5] [德]胡塞尔. 现象学的观念[M]. 倪良康, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2007.
[6] Heidegger, M. (2008) Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.