雍奎魁案证据分析—再议“同一认定谬见”

Evidence Analysis on the Case of Yong Kuikui—The Individualization Fallacy in China

摘要: 雍奎魁案历经四次庭审，争议焦点集中于现场附近“一塑料袋橙子”上检出的一枚匹配指纹与本案待证事实的相关性之上。根据分析，现有证据无法确定该袋橙子与犯罪现场的橙子具有同一性，因而与本案不具有相关性，其他证据无法形成确实充分的证据链条，存在合理怀疑，无法支持有罪判决。本案的背后蕴含同一认定谬误的问题，值得结合英美法视域下的研究成果，予以深入反思。

Abstract: Yong Kuikui case went through four times of trial. Substantial disputes focused on the relevancy of one matched fingermark extracted on a bag of orange collected near the crime scene. After studying the case thoroughly, this article finds that the evidence in the case is not sufficient to identify the relevancy of the bag of orange. Given that, there is a reasonable doubt to hold the defendant’s guilty verdict. Against this backdrop, there exists the issue of individualization fallacy, which is an evidence theory of common law system. Therefore, I maintain the value of rethinking this case and relative research of the individualization fallacy theory.