动机访谈对孕产妇知觉压力及抑郁水平的影响
Impact of Motivational Interviewing on the Perceived Stress and the Level of Depression in Pregnant Women
DOI: 10.12677/NS.2018.75043, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 田建丽*, 焦亚辉, 王 萱, 王 耐, 李 青, 王 颖:承德医学院,河北 承德
关键词: 孕产妇抑郁知觉压力动机访谈Pregnant Women Depression Perceived Stress Motivational Interviewing
摘要: 目的:探讨动机访谈对孕产妇知觉压力及抑郁水平的影响。方法:将68例孕产妇分为干预组和对照组各34例,两组均接受常规护理,干预组在此基础上进行动机访谈干预。分别于产前38周、产后10天、产后42天及产后3个月测评孕产妇的心理反应。结果:最终干预组有效样本28例,对照组有效样本31例。孕产妇接受动机访谈后,产后10天、产后42天及产后3个月CPSS得分(33.42 ± 6.69、32.08 ± 8.06、31.05 ± 8.24)、EPDS得分(8.49 ± 4.34、6.94 ± 2.33、6.07 ± 1.92)均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论动机访谈能有效降低孕产妇的知觉压力水平,改善其抑郁状况。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the impact of motivational interviewing on the perceived stress and the level of depression in pregnant women. Methods: 68 pregnant women were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the control group received routine care, with the patients in the expe-rimental group receiving motivational interviewing intervention on this basis. The psychological reaction of the pregnant women was measured at 38 weeks pregnancy, 10 days postpartum, 42 days postpartum and 3 months postpartum. Results: The effective sample of the final intervention group was 28, and the control group had 31 cases. After the motivational interviewing, the scores of CPSS (33.42 ± 6.69, 32.08 ± 8.06, 31.05 ± 8.24) and EPDS (8.49 ± 4.34, 6.94 ± 2.33, 6.07 ± 1.92) of the intervention group were all lower than the control group (P < 0.01) at 10 days postpartum, 42 days postpartum and 3 months postpartum. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Motivational interviewing can effectively reduce the perceived stress and improve the depressive status of the pregnant women.
文章引用:田建丽, 焦亚辉, 王萱, 王耐, 李青, 王颖. 动机访谈对孕产妇知觉压力及抑郁水平的影响[J]. 护理学, 2018, 7(5): 231-235. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2018.75043

参考文献

[1] Chen, S.M., Creedy, D., Lin, H.S., et al. (2012) Effects of Motivational Interviewing Intervention on Self-Management, Psychological and Glycemic Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 637-644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 李蒙, 李婷, 施秉银, 等. 动机性访谈对长期血糖控制不良2型糖尿病患者生存质量及其相关因素的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(1): 6-10.
[3] 雷红菊, 冯秀娟, 甄洁洁. 动机访谈路线图改善2型糖尿病患者生活质量的效果观察[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2016, 16(5): 350-352.
[4] 林蓓蕾, 张振香, 康佳迅, 等. 基于跨理论模型动机访谈促进首发脑卒中患者健康行为的效果研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2014(31): 3738-3741.
[5] 杨廷忠, 黄汉腾. 社会转型中城市居民心理压力的流行病学研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2003, 24(9): 760-764.
[6] 朱玉梅. 大学生压力知觉、心理弹性及应对方式的关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2011.
[7] Wang, Y., Guo, X., Lau, Y., et al. (2009) Psychometric Evaluation of the Mainland Chinese Version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 813-823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Matchim, Y., Armer, J.M. and Stewart, B.R. (2011) Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Literature Review and Discussion. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38, 61-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 戴红霞. 系统化护理对产妇压力和婴儿喂养方式干预效果研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2015, 15(2): 77-79.
[10] Thompson, D.R., Chair, S.Y., Chan, S.W., et al. (2011) Motivational Interviewing: A Useful Approach to Improving Cardiovascular Health? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 1236-1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 李利娜, 裴大军, 李梅. 动机性访谈对慢性心力衰竭患者疾病管理的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015, 21(2): 179-182.
[12] Lau, Y., Wong, K.F. and Chan, K.S. (2010) The Utility of Screening for Perinatal Depression in the Second Trimester among Chinese: A Three-Wave Prospective Longitudinal Study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 13, 153-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 汪静. 武汉市妇女孕产期抑郁及流入人口产后抑郁的观察性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2015.
[14] Ryan, D., Milis, L. and Misri, N. (2005) Depression during Pregnancy. Canadian Fam-ily Physician (Medecin De Famille Canadien), 51, 1087-1093.