大学生攻击易感人格问卷的编制
Development of the Aggression Susceptible Personality Questionnaire for College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.810176, PDF,   
作者: 任 婷：陕西师范大学心理学院，陕西 西安；夏凌翔：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 攻击易感人格；问卷编制；因子分析；大学生；Aggression Susceptible Personality； Questionnaire； Factor Analysis； College Students
摘要: 目的：编制大学生攻击易感人格问卷，并检验其信度和效度。方法：对50名大学生进行开放式问卷调查，形成初始问卷；以300名大学生为被试对初始问卷进行探索性因素分析，以另外500名大学生为被试对初始问卷进行验证性因素分析和信效度检验，形成最终问卷。结果：最终确定的问卷包括25个项目，包括神经质、情绪易感性、冲动性、冷酷无情、自我中心5个因子，可以解释总变异的41.59%；验证性因素分析结果表明模型拟合较好(X2 = 17.5, df = 4, X2/df = 4.38, SRMR = 0.024, GFI = 0.986, NNFI = 0.962, CFI = 0.985)；总问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.874，分半信度为0.828，各维度得分与总分的相关为0.69~0.85。结论：该问卷的信效度都达到了测量学的要求。
Abstract: Objective: To develop the aggression susceptible personality questionnaire for college students and examine its reliabilities and validities. Methods: Based on open-ended questionnaire, content analysis and literature review, 125 original items were developed. Totally 300 students were selected to complete the test version for exploratory factor analysis. Totally 500 students were tested with formal version for further confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The questionnaire consists of 25 items, including 5 factors, namely, “Neuroticism”, “Emotional susceptibility”, “Impulsiveness”, “Callous-Unemotional” and “Egoism”, explaining 41.59% of the total variance. It has good structure validity (X2 = 718, df = 264, X2/df = 2.72, RMSEA = 0.06, GFI = 0.888, SRMR = 0.057, NNFI = 0.84, CFI = 0.859). The Cronbach coefficients and split-half correlation coefficients were 0.874 and 0.828, the five factors were positively correlated with the total questionnaire scores (0.69~0.85). Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the aggression susceptible personality questionnaire for college students meet the needs of psychometrics.
文章引用：任婷, 夏凌翔 (2018). 大学生攻击易感人格问卷的编制. 心理学进展, 8(10), 1520-1526. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.810176

参考文献

[1] 曹丛, 王美萍, 张文新, 等(2012). 主动性攻击和反应性攻击的遗传基础研究述评. 心理科学进展, 20(12), 2001-2010.
[2] 陈瑞云, 杨寅, 林洁瀛, 等(2011). 大学生冲动攻击性和预谋攻击性特点及影响因素. 中国临床科学, 19(6), 814-817.
[3] 李献云, 费云鹏, 张亚利, 等(2011). Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 37(10), 607-613.
[4] 刘文文, 江琦, 任晶晶, 等(2015). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 敌意认知和冲动性水平有调节的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 485-493.
[5] 刘轩, 高正亮(2013). 大学生攻击行为现况及影响因素分析. 中国学校卫生, 3(34), 353-354.
[6] 罗亚莉, 张大均, 刘云波, 等(2011). 特质愤怒量表中文版在大学生人群应用的信度和效度. 心理卫生评估, 25(9), 700-705.
[7] 杨波, 黄秀(2013). 冷酷无情特质对青少年暴力犯罪的影响. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 39(4), 80-84.
[8] 周广东, 冯丽姝(2014). 区分两类攻击行为: 反应性与主动性攻击. 心理发展与教育, 1(14), 105-111.
[9] Bettencourt, A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J. et al. (2006). Personality and Aggressive Behavior under Provoking and Neutral Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751-777.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Caprara, G. V. (1982). A Comparison of the Frustration-Aggression and Emotional Susceptibility Hypotheses. Aggression Behavior, 8, 234-236.[CrossRef] 
[11] Hosie, J., Gilbert, F., Simpson, K. et al. (2014). An Examination of the Relationship between Personality and Aggression Using the General Aggression and Five Factor Models. Aggression Behavior, 40, 189-196.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kamaluddin, M. R., Shariff, N. S. M., Othman, A. et al. (2014). Associations between Personality Traits and Aggression among Malay Adult Male Inmates in Malaysia. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 176-185.
[13] Romero, L. L., Fraguela, J. A. G., & Romero, E. (2015). Assessing Callous-Unemotional Traits in a Spanish Sample of Institutionalized Youths: The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 392-406.[CrossRef]