三峡库区(重庆段)生态补偿额度多维度量化研究
Quantitative Research on Multidimensional Payment for Ecosystem Services’ of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing Section)
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2018.86117, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 程丽丹, 刘慧敏, 官冬杰:重庆交通大学建筑与城市规划学院,重庆;刘丽颖:重庆交通大学河海学院,重庆
关键词: 生态补偿三峡库区多维度模型量化机制Payment for Ecosystem Services Three Gorges Reservoir Area Multiple Dimensions Model Quantization Mechanism
摘要: 生态补偿作为当前国际公认的生态环境保护手段之一,如何量化生态补偿标准,已成为各界学者研究的热点问题。本文以三峡库区(重庆段)为研究区域,以生态、经济、社会公平度为切入点构建生态补偿标准多维度量化指标体系,运用生态服务价值法、机会成本法和条件价值法构建生态补偿标准多维度量化模型,经过系数修正并进行测算,确定出生态补偿标准额度,剖析区域间生态补偿标准空间格局演变过程,科学制定重庆三峡库区不同区域生态补偿的分配标准,提出重庆三峡库区生态补偿标准的调控机制。研究结果表明:从生态角度出发,通过生态服务价值法测算出的2015年重庆三峡库区生态补偿额度为10.99亿元;从经济角度出发,通过机会成本法测算出的2015年重庆三峡库区生态补偿额度为10.09亿元;从社会公平角度出发,通过条件价值法测算出的2015年重庆三峡库区受偿意愿偿额度为66.37亿元、支付意愿偿额度为25.52亿元;结果表明在空间上自然地理要素和经济要素的补偿测算准确度明显优于社会人文要素补偿测算,制定生态补偿标准时主要参考自然和经济要素的测算值,为科学制定生态补偿标准提供参考。
Abstract: As one of the internationally recognized ecological environmental protection methods, ecological compensation has become a hot issue for scholars from all walks of life. This paper takes the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing Section) as the research area, and constructs the multi-dimensional measurement index system of ecological compensation standard with ecological, economic and social equity as the entry point, and constructs ecological compensation by using ecological service value method, opportunity cost method and conditional value method. Standard multi-dimensional measurement models, after coefficient correction and calculation, determine the ecological compensation standard quota, analyze the spatial pattern evolution process of inter-regional ecological compensation standard, scientifically formulate the allocation standard of ecological compensation in different regions of Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir Area, and propose Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir Area—the regulation mechanism of ecological compensation standards. The research results show that from the ecological point of view, the eco-compensation amount of Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir Area in 2015 is 1.09 billion Yuan calculated by the ecological service value method. From the economic point of view, the ecological environment of Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir in 2015 is calculated by the opportunity cost method. The compensation amount is 1.009 billion Yuan; from the perspective of social equity, the compensation for the Three Gorges reservoir area in Chongqing in 2015 is 6.637 billion Yuan and the willingness to pay is 2.552 billion Yuan; the results show that the accuracy of compensation for natural geographical factors and economic factors is obviously better than that of social human factors compensation. When formulating ecological compensation standards, it mainly refers to the measured values of natural and economic factors, which provides a reference for the scientific formulation of ecological compensation standards. 
文章引用:程丽丹, 刘慧敏, 刘丽颖, 官冬杰. 三峡库区(重庆段)生态补偿额度多维度量化研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2018, 8(6): 1067-1077. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2018.86117

参考文献

[1] 赖力, 黄贤金, 等. 生态补偿理论、方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2008(6): 2870-2877.
[2] 秦艳红, 康慕谊. 国内外生态补偿现状及其完善措施[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007(7): 557-567.
[3] 葛颜祥, 刘菲菲. 流域生态补偿:政府补偿与市场补偿比较与选择[J]. 山东农业大学学报, 2007(4): 48-53.
[4] 谢利玉. 浅论公益林生态效益补偿问题[J]. 世界林业研究, 2000(3): 70-76.
[5] 张秋根, 晏雨鸿, 等. 浅析公益林生态效益补偿理论[J]. 中南林业调查规划, 2001(2): 46-49.
[6] 熊鹰, 王克林, 等. 洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估[J]. 地理学报, 2004(5): 772-780.
[7] 于水潇, 赵瑞东, 赵青, 等. 基于能值分析和生态用地分类的河北省生态补偿研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017(8): 324-330.
[8] Cuperus, R., Caters, K.J. and Piepers, A.A.G. (1996) Ecological Compensation of the Impacts of a Road. Preliminary Method of A 50 Road Link. Ecological Engineering, 7, 327-349.
[9] Allen, A.O. and Feddema, J.J. (1996) Wetland Loss and Substitution by the Permit Program in Southern California, US. Environmental Management, 20, 263-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wunder, S. (2005) Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, 3-8.
[11] 陈丹红. 构建生态补偿机制实现可持续发展[J]. 生态经济, 2005(12): 48-50.
[12] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
[13] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196.
[14] Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. (1947) Capital Returns from Soil Conservation Practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 29, 1181-1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Mombo, F., Lusambo, L., Speelman, S., Buysse, J., Munishi, P. and Huylenbroeck, G.V. (2014) Scope for Introducing Payments for Ecosystem Services as a Strategy to Reduce Deforestation in the Kilombero Wetlands Catchment Area. Forest Policy and Economics, 38, 81-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 孙盼盼, 尹珂. 基于农户意愿的三峡库区消落带弃耕经济补贴标准估算及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(29): 115-119.
[17] 董长贵, 邬亮, 王海滨. 基于条件价值评估法的北京密云水库生态价值评估(I) [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(33): 14707-14709.