基于社会启发假说对公平偏好的论证
An Argument for Fairness Preference Based on the Social Heuristic Hypothesis
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.811189, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 陈萌萌：天津师范大学，天津；胡 凯：杨村第十二小学，天津
关键词: 公平偏好；最后通牒博弈；双系统理论；社会启发假说；Fairness Preference； Ultimate Game； Dual Systems Theory； Social Heuristics Hypothesis
摘要: 在博弈决策中，个体倾向于以拒绝不公平提议的方式惩罚决策提议者。根据双系统理论，研究者提出了社会启发假说，该假说认为个体拒绝不公平提议是受公平偏好影响的社会人行为，本文从研究范式和控制个体加工方式两方面进行了总结，实验范式的差异和控制方法的不同导致结果存在着不同，在未来的研究中需要完善实验方法，对加工方式的差异性进行系统的解释。
Abstract: In game decision-making, individuals tend to punish policy makers by refusing unfair proposals. According to the dual system theory, the researchers put forward the Social Heuristics hypothesis. The hypothesis is that individual rejection of unfair proposals is a social behavior influenced by fairness preference. This paper summarizes the two aspects of research paradigm and individual processing. The difference between experimental paradigm and control method leads to different results. In the future research, we need to improve the experimental methods and explain systematically the differences of processing methods.
文章引用：陈萌萌, 胡凯 (2018). 基于社会启发假说对公平偏好的论证. 心理学进展, 8(11), 1634-1641. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.811189

参考文献

[1] 刘长江, 张跃, 郝芳, 刘采梦, 丁絮, 石雨(2016). 利益冲突情境中社会行为的自动激活: 合作还是利己? 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1897-1906.
[2] 罗艺, 封春亮, 古若雷, 吴婷婷, 罗跃嘉(2013). 社会决策中的公平准则及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 300-308.
[3] 孙彦, 李纾, 殷晓莉(2007). 决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统. 心理科学进展, 15(5), 721-726.
[4] 吴燕, 周晓林(2012). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44(6), 797-806.
[5] 徐富明, 李欧, 邓颖, 刘程浩, 史燕伟(2016). 行为经济学中的不平等规避. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1613-1622.
[6] 杨治良, 郭力平(2001). 认知风格的研究进展. 心理科学, 24(3), 326-329.
[7] 张慧, 马红宇, 徐富明, 刘燕君, 史燕伟(2018). 最后通牒博弈中的公平偏好: 基于双系统理论的视角. 心理科学进展, 26(2), 319-330.
[8] 张万里, 刘笑(2014). 最后通牒博弈研究述评. 潍坊工程职业学院学报, 27(2), 30-33.
[9] 张振(2013). 群体身份影响公平加工的行为与脑电研究. 硕士论文. 天津: 天津师范大学.
[10] 周晓林, 胡捷, 彭璐(2015). 社会情境影响公平感知及相关行为的神经机制. 心理与行为研究, 13(5), 591-598.
[11] Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., & Wagner, A. K. (2016). The Impact of Self-Control Depletion on Social Preferences in the Ultimatum Game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 1-16.[CrossRef] 
[12] Bear, A., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Intuition, Deliberation, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 936-941.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2013). Who Is “Behavioral”? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 1231-1255.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Bieleke, M., Gollwitzer, P. M., Oettingen, G., & Fischbacher, U. (2017). Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 569-581.[CrossRef] 
[15] Cappelletti, D., Güth, W., & Ploner, M. (2011). Being of Two Minds: Ultimatum Offers under Cognitive Constraints. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 940-950.[CrossRef] 
[16] Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., Mcelreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian Motives in Humans. Nature, 446, 794-796.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., Epstein, E. B., Jacobson, J. A., & Macdonald, T. K. (2006). Visceral Influences on Risk-Taking Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 99-113.[CrossRef] 
[18] Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.[CrossRef] 
[20] Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E. et al. (1994). Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347-369.[CrossRef] 
[21] Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.[CrossRef] 
[22] Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367-388.[CrossRef] 
[23] Haruno, M., Kimura, M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Activity in the Nucleus Accumbens and Amygdala Underlies Individual Differences in Prosocial and Individualistic Economic Choices. Cognitive Neuroscience Journal of, 26, 1861-1870.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Ed.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[25] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.
[26] Knoch, D., & Nash, K. (2015). Self-Control in Social Decision Making: A Neurobiological Perspective. In G. Gendolla, M. Tops, & S. Koole (Eds.), Handbook of Biobehavioral Approaches to Self-Regulation (pp. 221-234). New York: Springer.[CrossRef] 
[27] Knoch, D., Gianotti, L. R. R., Baumgartner, T., & Fehr, E. (2010). A Neural Marker of Costly Punishment Behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 337-342.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex. Science, 314, 829-832.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Myrseth, K. O. R., Fishbach, A., & Trope, Y. (2009). Counteractive Self-Control: When Making Temptation Available Makes Temptation Less Tempting. Psychological Science, 20, 159-163.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The Cognitive Control of Emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242-249.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-Regulation of Goal Setting: Turning Free Fantasies about the Future into Binding Goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736-753.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Ottone, S. (2004). Transfers and Altruistic Punishments in Third Party Punishment Game Experiments. Polis Working Papers.
[33] Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous Giving and Calculated Greed. Nature, 489, 427-430.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Rubinstein, A. (2007). Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. The Economic Journal, 117(523), 1243-1259.[CrossRef] 
[35] Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300, 1755-1758.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Schwartz, G. E., & Weinberger, D. A. (1980). Patterns of Emotional Responses to Affective Situations: Relations among Happiness, Sadness, Anger, Fear, Depression, and Anxiety. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 175-191.[CrossRef] 
[37] Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two Systems of Reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 379-396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[38] Soutschek, A., & Schubert, T. (2016). The Importance of Working Memory Updating in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Psychological Research, 80, 172-180.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Stefan, S., Cornelia, H., Michael, S., Andrea, K., & Claus, V. (2011). Overcoming Selfishness: Reciprocity, Inhibition, and Cardiac-Autonomic Control in the Ultimatum Game. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 173.
[40] Sutter, M., Kocher, M., & Strauß, S. (2003). Bargaining under Time Pressure in an Experimental Ultimatum Game. Economics Letters, 81, 341-347.[CrossRef] 
[41] Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The Sunny Side of Fairness Preference for Fairness Activates Reward Circuitry (and Disregarding Unfairness Activates Self-Control Circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339-347.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual Differences in Ease of Perception of Embedded Figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1-15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Wright, P. (1974). The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.[CrossRef] 
[44] Yu, J., Zhu, L., & Leslie, A. M. (2016). Children’s Sharing Behavior in Mini-Dictator Games: The Role of In-Group Favoritism and Theory of Mind. Child Development, 87, 1747-1757.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Yu, R., Calder, A. J., & Mobbs, D. (2014). Overlapping and Distinct Representations of Advantageous and Disadvantageous Inequality. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 3290-3301.[CrossRef] [PubMed]