权力感对攻击行为的影响：基于竞争反应时任务的研究
The Influence of Sense of Power on Aggressive Behavior: A Study Based on Competitive Reaction Time Task
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2018.811200, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 云 祥：南京森林警察学院管理学院，江苏 南京
关键词: 权力感；攻击行为；竞争反应时任务；Sense of Power； Aggression Behavior； Competitive Reaction Time Task
摘要: 实验研究了权力感与攻击行为的关系。在实验中，通过情境回忆的任务启动被试的权力感，接着采用竞争反应时任务范式测量被试的攻击行为，考察权力感启动对攻击行为的影响。结果发现：启动高权力感的被试在竞争反应时任务中选择的噪音惩罚等级显著高于控制组被试。这一结果说明权力感会增加个体的攻击行为。文章最后对权力导致攻击行为增加的原因作了讨论。
Abstract: The experiment studies the relationship between the sense of power and aggressive behavior. In the experiment, the participants’ sense of power was initiated by the context recall task, and then the competitive reaction time task paradigm was used to measure the aggressive behavior of the participants, and examined the influence of the sense of power on aggressive behavior. The results showed that the level of noise penalty selected by the participants with high sense of power in the competitive reaction time task was significantly higher than that of the control group. This result suggests that the sense of power increases the individual’s aggressive behavior. The article concludes with a discussion of the reasons for the increase in power-induced aggression.
文章引用：云祥 (2018). 权力感对攻击行为的影响：基于竞争反应时任务的研究. 心理学进展, 8(11), 1719-1725. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2018.811200

参考文献

[1] 段锦云, 黄彩云(2013). 个人权力感对进谏行为的影响机制：权力认知的视角. 心理学报, 45(2), 217-230.[CrossRef] 
[2] 李小平, 闫鸿磊, 云祥(2014). 权力感的启动对内隐和外显暴力态度的影响. 应用心理学, 20(4), 323-331.
[3] 邵道生(2004). 违规拆迁与圈地的“权力性暴力”. 中国土地, No. 7, 36-37.
[4] 云祥, 李小平(2016). “权力–暴力”内隐联结关系探析. 心理研究, 10(6), 31-36.
[5] Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, Optimism, and Risk-Taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.[CrossRef] 
[6] Bandura, A. (2002). Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119.[CrossRef] 
[7] Chen, S., Lee-chai, & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Elson, M., Mohseni, M. R., Breuer, J., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2014). Press CRTT to Measure Aggressive Behavior: The Unstandardized Use of the Competitive Reaction Time Task in Aggression Research. Psychological Assessment, 26, 419-432.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power Reduces the Press of the Situation: Implications for Creativity, Conformity, and Dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and Perspectives Not Taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Giancola, P. R., & Chermack, S. T. (1998). Construct Validity of Laboratory Aggression Paradigms: A Response to Tedeschi and Quigley. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 237-253.[CrossRef] 
[13] Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 227-256.[CrossRef] 
[14] Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the Objectification of Social Targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Guinote, A. (2007). Behavior Variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 256-295.
[16] Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and Offending: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476.[CrossRef] 
[18] Kifer, Y., Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). The Good Life of the Powerful: The Experience of Power and Authenticity Enhances Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Science, 24, 280-288.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kraus, M. W., Chen, S., & Keltner, D. (2011). The Power to Be Me: Power Elevates Self-Concept Consistency and Authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 974-980.[CrossRef] 
[20] Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power Increases Hypocrisy: Moralizing in Reasoning, Immorality in Behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737-744.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The Social Distance Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, Risk, and the Status Quo: Does Power Promote Riskier or More Conservative Decision Making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451-462.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Power and Emotion in Negotiation: Power Moderates the Interpersonal Effects of Anger and Happiness on Concession Making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557-581.[CrossRef]