不同榆树枝条及叶形指数差异对比分析
Comparison and Analysis of Differences of Different Tree Branch and Leaf Shape Index
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2018.76075, PDF,   
作者: 张祺超, 张响玲, 刘 丽, 苏 蕾, 王健凯:黄骅市园林局,河北 黄骅
关键词: 榆树枝条叶形指数Ulmus pumila Linn. Branch Leaf Shape Index
摘要: 本文以5个榆树品种为试材,对5个榆树品种或无性系的枝条节间长度、枝条开张角度和叶形指数进行分析,采用单因素方差分析、邓肯检验多重比较的方法,对其枝条和叶形的差异性进行研究。研究结果表明:1) 参试的5个榆树品种中,在平均节间长度间有显著差异(P < 0.001),其中较大的是凤尾榆和青榆;平均开张角度方面较大的是凤尾榆,但5个榆树品种无显著差异;2) 5个品种在平均叶面积、平均叶周长、圆度、水平距离、竖直距离、锯齿的平均深度、锯齿的平均宽度、锯齿数量等方面有显著差异,青榆在平均叶面积、平均叶周长、圆度、水平距离、竖直距离、锯齿的平均深度、锯齿的平均宽度、锯齿数量8个叶形指数指标值最大,凤尾榆在平均叶面积、平均叶周长、水平距离、竖直距离、锯齿的平均深度、锯齿的平均宽度、锯齿数量7个叶形指数指标值处于第2位,长宽比最大的是凤尾榆,其次是圆冠榆。
Abstract: Five elm varieties or elm clones were used as test materials to analyze the internode length, branch opening angle and leaf shape index of five elm varieties or clones. One-way ANOVA and Duncan test multiple comparison methods were used to study the differences between its branches and leaf shapes. The results showed that: 1) Among the five elm varieties tested, there were significant differences among the average internode lengths, the larger ones were Ulmus laciniata and the Manchurian elm, and the Ulmus laciniata has larger average opening angle. However, there were no significant differences among the five elm varieties; 2) the five varieties have significant differences on average leaf area, average leaf circumference, roundness, horizontal distance, vertical distance, average depth of serrations, average width of serrations, and number of serrations. Significantly, the average leaf area, average leaf circumference, roundness, horizontal distance, vertical distance, average depth of serrations, average width of serrations, and number of serrations of Manchurian elm were the largest in the eight leaf shape index values. The average leaf area, average leaf circumference, horizontal distance, vertical distance, average depth of serrations, average width of serrations, and number of serrations of Ulmus laciniata are the second in the shape of the leaflet index, and Ulmus laciniata has the largest aspect ratio, followed by the Ulmus densa.
文章引用:张祺超, 张响玲, 刘丽, 苏蕾, 王健凯. 不同榆树枝条及叶形指数差异对比分析[J]. 植物学研究, 2018, 7(6): 605-610. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2018.76075

参考文献

[1] 山西省林业科学研究院. 山西树木志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001: 148-156.
[2] 徐作新. 关注榆树[J]. 内蒙古林业, 2004(3): 45.
[3] 索奎霖. 面积•位置•效率城市绿地生态效益的三大柱石[J]. 中国园林, 1999, 15(63): 52-53.
[4] 傅立国. 中国榆属的研究[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1980, 8(3): 75-77.
[5] 董宝华, 龙雅宜. 园林绿化植物的选择与栽培[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007: 160-162.
[6] 龙雅宜. 园林植物栽培手册[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004: 389-391.
[7] 张畅, 姜卫兵, 韩健. 论榆树及其在园林绿化中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(10): 202-206.
[8] 刘新民, 赵哈林, 赵爱芬. 科尔沁沙地风沙环境与植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[9] 赵思思, 梁海永, 王晓叶, 等. 榆树种质资源的研究进展[J]. 河北林果研究, 2017, 32(Z1): 232-237.
[10] 陈志峰, 章希娟, 许玲, 等. 杧果种质资源部分植物学性状分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(3): 70-73 + 77.
[11] 邵士娟, 姜慧, 殷瑞雪. 银杏不同品系叶部观赏性状及优良品系筛选[J]. 中国农业信息, 2014(5): 225.
[12] 李士美, 崔希峰, 王成生, 等. 银杏观赏品种的叶片形态特性[J]. 林业科技开发, 2006, 20(2): 43-46.
[13] 陈衍泰, 陈国宏, 李美娟. 综合评价方法分类及研究进展[J]. 管理科学学报, 2004, 7(2): 69-79.
[14] 李雷鹏. 榆树在哈尔滨城市绿化中的应用现状及发展前景的综合评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2004.