比较锥形束CT和曲面体层片在下颌第三磨牙拔除时神经管损伤风险评估的优势
Advantages of CBCT or OPG in Risk Assessment for MC Injury When MTM Will Be Extracted
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2018.810165, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 罗 剑, 童庆春:上海市嘉定区中心医院,口腔科,上海;史翠平:同济大学附属口腔医院,口腔技工中心,上海
关键词: 曲面体层片锥形束CT下颌第三磨牙下颌管风险评估骨白线Orthpantomography (OPG) Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Mandibular Third Molar (TMT) Mandibular Canal (MC) Risk Assessment Bone White Line
摘要: 目的:用锥形束CT(CBCT)进一步评估在曲面体层片中表现为下颌第三磨牙和下颌管影像重叠时二者的三维解剖关系,以此预测下颌第三磨牙拔除过程中下颌管损伤的风险。方法:对在曲面体层片中表现为下颌第三磨牙和下颌管影像重叠的患者行CBCT检查,运用软件(Plameca Romexis 3.8.3.R)对所得图像测量分析,通过SAS 10.0软件对所得数据进行X2检验。结果:当全面体层中表现为下颌第三磨牙和下颌管影像重叠时,骨白线是否中断与两者是否接触存在相关性。结论:CBCT与曲面体层片相比,可以更准确地反映下颌第三磨牙与下颌管的三维解剖关系,预判拔除风险。
Abstract: Objective: CBCT was used to further evaluate the 3D anatomical relationship between the MTM and the MC overlap in the OPG to predict the risk of MC injury during MTM extraction. Methods: CBCT examination was performed on patients who showed MTM and MC image overlap in OPG, and the obtained images were measured and analyzed by software (Plameca Romexis 3.8.3.R), and the obtained data were subjected to X2 test by SAS 10.0 software. Results: When the OMG appears to overlap the MTM and MC images, there is a correlation between whether the bone white line is interrupted or not. Conclusion: Compared with OPG, CBCT can more accurately reflect the 3D ana-tomical relationship between MTM and MC, and predict the risk of extraction.
文章引用:罗剑, 史翠平, 童庆春. 比较锥形束CT和曲面体层片在下颌第三磨牙拔除时神经管损伤风险评估的优势[J]. 临床医学进展, 2018, 8(10): 988-993. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2018.810165

参考文献

[1] 罗剑, 史翠平, 童庆春. 盐酸米诺环素软膏联合牛黄解毒片治疗轻症急性冠周炎的临床疗效观察[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2018, 27(1): 54-57.
[2] 寿娟, 李生娇, 苏剑生, 等. 下颌管与下颌第三磨牙牙根相对位置关系的CBCT研究[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2013, 23(2): 105-109.
[3] 丁允鹏, 李生娇, 钱瀚宇, 等. 应用CBCT分析阻生下颌第三磨牙牙根与下颌管的相对位置关系[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2018, 32(1): 113-116.
[4] Jing, G., Zheng, J.W., Chi, Y., et al. (2016) Variations in the Buccal-Lingual Alveolar Bone Thickness of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: Our Classification and Treatment Perspectives. Science Reports, No. 1, 1-9.
[5] Yu, S.K., Lee, M.H., Jeon, Y.H., et al. (2016) Anatomical Configuration of the Inferior Alveolar Neurovascular Bundle: A Histomorphometric Analysis. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 38, 195-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Suomalainen, A., Venta, I., Mattila, M., et al. (2010) Reliability of CBCT and Other Radiographic Methods in Preoperative Evaluation of Lower Third Molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2, 276-283.
[7] Jerjes, W., Upile, T., Shah, P., et al. (2010) Risk Factors Associated with Injury to the Inferior Alveolar and Lingual Nerves Following Third Molar Surgery—Revisited. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 109, 335-339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cheung, L.K., Leung, Y.Y., Chow, L.K., et al. (2009) Incidence of Neurosensory Deficits and Recovery after Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Study of 4338 Cases. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 39, 320-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ghaeminia, H., Meijer, G.J., Soehardi, A., et al. (2009) Position of the Impacted Third Molar in Relation to the Mandibular Canal. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed To-mography Compared with Panoramic Radiography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 38, 964-971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]