贵阳市大气环境容量核算研究
A Study on the Atmospheric Environmental Capacity Accounting in Guiyang
摘要:
本文利用贵州省气象局提供的2015年3月~2016年2月的地面观测资料,基于箱模型的宏观总量控制阀(A值法)对贵阳地区季节A值和贵阳市的四项污染物(SO
2、NO
2、PM10和PM2.5)季节环境容量进行核算研究。研究结果表明:1) 贵阳市春夏秋冬A值分别为0.75、0.61、0.64、0.59;SO
2、NO
2、PM10和PM2.5的年总大气环境容量分别为100.1、19.1、55.0和26.3 (10
4 t•a
−1)。2) 各污染物季节大气环境容量,皆以夏季最大,冬季最小。而四项污染因子中,SO2的环境容量最大。3) 四种清除方式中,均以湿沉降为主要,干沉降和化学清除项所占比例最小。4) 各季节通风量和湿沉降时间分布不均匀是造成贵阳市各个季节大气环境容量差异的主要因素。
Abstract:
Through the box model-based macro total control valve (“A” value method), this study analyzes the seasonal variations in “A” value and environmental capacity of the four pollutants (SO2, NO2, PM10 and PM2.5) in Guiyang city, using ground-based observation data from Mach 2015 to February 2016 provided by the Guizhou Meteorological Bureau. The conclusions are as follows: 1) Seasonal “A” values are 0.75, 0.61, 0.64 and 0.59 in Guiyang for spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. In contrast, the annual total atmospheric environment capacity was 100.1, 19.1, 55.0 and 26.3 (104 t•a−1 for SO2, NO2, PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. 2) Seasonal atmospheric environmental capacity for all pollutant reached the maximum in summer and reached its minimum in winter. Among the four pollution factors, SO2 has the largest environmental capacity. 3) Among the four removal methods, wet deposition is the main one, while dry sedimentation and chemical removal accounted for the smallest proportion. 4) The uneven distribution of seasonal ventilation and wet deposition time is the main factor causing the difference of atmospheric environmental capacity in different seasons in Guiyang.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王金南, 雷宇, 薛文博, 张伟. 基于CREP的国家环境质量改善工程规划与管理: 以《大气污染防治行动计划》为例[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(12): 64-68.
|
|
[2]
|
王涵瑾, 王源程, 倪长健. 基于修正A值法核算成都市季节大气环境容量[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2015, 40(3): 71-74.
|
|
[3]
|
吴利彬, 周书华, 倪长健, 等. 成都及其周边地区霾时空分布特征研究[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2014, 34(6): 63-67.
|
|
[4]
|
欧阳晓光. 大气环境容量A-P值法中A值的修正算法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(1): 37-40.
|
|
[5]
|
Houthuijs, D., Breugelmans, O., Hoek, G., et al. (2001) PM10 and PM2.5 Concertrations on Central and East Europe: Results from the CESAR Study. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2757-2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Zheng, M., Fang, M., Wang, F., et al. (2000) Characterization of the Solvent Extractable Organic Compounds in PM2.5 Aerosols in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 2691-2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Ramachandran, R. and Jeeva Gupta, K.S. (1994) Variability of Surface Roughness and Turbulence Intensities at a Coastal Site in India. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 70, 385-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Prior, E.J., McDougal, D.S. and Schiess, J.R. (1981) Approach to Forecasting Daily Maximum Ozone Levels in St. Louis. Environ Science and Technology, 15, 430-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[9]
|
Edgerton, S.A., Bian, X., Doran, J.C., et al. (1999) Particulate Air Pollution in Mexico City a Col Laborative Research Project. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 49, 1221-1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[10]
|
中华人民共和国大气污染防治法[Z].
|
|
[11]
|
国家环境保护局. 环境空气质量功能区划分原则与技术方法[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1996.
|
|
[12]
|
国家环境保护局. GB/T 13201-91制定地方大气污染物排放标准的技术方法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1991.
|
|
[13]
|
国家环境保护局. 城市大气污染总量控制方法手册[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1991.
|