干旱灌区土壤水分效应评析
Evaluation of Soil Water Effect in Arid Irrigated Area
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2019.71006, PDF,  被引量    国家科技经费支持
作者: 周和平*, 翟 超:新疆维吾尔自治区水利管理总站,新疆 乌鲁木齐;王 蓓, 潘 渝:新疆水利水电科学研究院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;高艳新:新疆三屯河流域管理处,新疆 昌吉
关键词: 干旱灌区含水率监测灌溉水分效应分析评估Arid Irrigated Area Water Content Monitoring Irrigation Water Effect Analysis and Evaluation
摘要: 为探究干旱区新疆滴灌、常规灌模式农田水分效应问题,基于典型灌区两年定位观测705,950土壤含水率信息,采用灌溉理论及数理统计检验评析表明:1) 北疆三屯河、东疆吐鲁番高昌和南疆于田灌区,农田土壤含水率消长适宜作物需水要求。2) 作物生长期土壤湿度50%以上且≥60%概率为0.85,土壤干湿状态利于作物生长。3) 土壤贮水量、占田间持水量60%以上有效水存量概率≥0.80,呈现耕层少,50~60 cm土层以下增多,滴灌耕层有效水分比常规沟畦灌少,下层滴灌和常规灌溉保持较多,利于作物根系汲取深层水分。4) 北疆灌区中、重壤土质滴灌田间用水定额42 mm,畦灌57 mm,滴灌比畦灌减少26%;东疆吐鲁番高昌灌区粘性及沙壤葡萄沟灌,田间用水定额45 mm,滴灌沙壤土22 mm,滴灌比沟灌减少51%;南疆于田灌区核桃套种小麦畦灌轻沙壤,田间用水定额38 mm。灌水后水量80%在40~60 cm土层,滴灌50 cm及以下,常规灌70 cm及以下。农田灌溉水分运行状态,为节水灌溉用水管理提供了依据。
Abstract: In order to explore the effect of drip irrigation and conventional irrigation on farmland water content in arid regions of Xinjiang, based on two-year positioning observation of 705,950 soil water content information in typical irrigation areas, irrigation theory and mathematical statistics were used to test and evaluate the results: 1) In Santun River of Northern Xinjiang, Gaochang of Turpan in East Xinjiang and Yutian Irrigation Area of Southern Xinjiang, the growth and decline of farmland soil water content were appropriate to crop water requirement. 2) The probability of soil moisture more than 50% and more than 60% is 0.85. The dry and wet state of soil is beneficial to crop growth. 3) The probability of soil water storage and effective water storage which accounts for more than 60% of field water capacity is more than 0.80. It shows that there are fewer tillage layers, more below 50 - 60 cm soil layers, less effective water in drip irrigation tillage layers than conventional furrow irrigation, and more drip irrigation and conventional irrigation in lower layers, which is beneficial for the root system to absorb deep water. 4) The field water use quota of drip irrigation for medium and heavy loam soil in Northern Xinjiang is 42 mm, and that for border irrigation is 57 mm, which is 26% less than that for border irrigation; the field water use quota for sticky and sandy loam grape furrow irrigation in Gaochang Irrigation Area of Turpan, East Xinjiang is 45 mm, and drip irrigation for sandy loam soil is 22 mm, which is 51% less than furrow irrigation; the field water use quota for walnut interplanting with wheat border irrigation for light sandy soil in Southern Xinjiang is 51%. Field water use quota is 38 mm. After irrigation, 80% of the water is in 40 - 60 cm soil layer, drip irrigation is 50 cm or less, and conventional irrigation is 70 cm or less. The running state of irrigation water in farmland provides a basis for water-saving irrigation water management.
文章引用:周和平, 王蓓, 潘渝, 高艳新, 翟超. 干旱灌区土壤水分效应评析[J]. 土壤科学, 2019, 7(1): 44-58. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2019.71006

参考文献

[1] 史克滨, 田军仓, 刘庆华. 灌溉排水工程学[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2006: 25-129.
[2] 靳宇蓉, 鲁克新, 李鹏, 等. 基于稳定同位素的土壤水分运动特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2015(4): 792-801.
[3] 串志强, 盛钰, 赵成义, 等. 膜下滴灌条件下绿洲棉田土壤水分运动数值模拟[J]. 干旱区地理, 2008(5): 673-679.
[4] Han, D.M. and Zhou, T.T. (2018) Soil Water Movement in the Unsaturated Zone of an Inland Arid Region: Mulched Drip Irrigation Experiment. Journal of Hydrology, 12, 13-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 赵彤, 范严伟, 赵廷红. 水平微润灌土壤水分运动数值模拟与验证[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018(3): 28-34.
[6] 张林, 吴普特, 朱德兰, 等. 多点源滴灌条件下土壤水分运移模拟试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2012, 30(2): 237-243.
[7] 张林, 吴普特, 范兴科. 多点源滴灌条件下土壤水分运动的数值模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9): 40-45.
[8] 李坡, 吴飞青, 胡正峰, 等. 节水灌溉中土壤水运动模拟研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015(3): 46-51.
[9] 张珂萌, 牛文全, 薛万来, 等. 间歇和连续灌溉土壤水分运动的模拟研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(3): 11-16.
[10] 张和喜, 袁友波, 舒贤坤, 等. 地下滴灌条件下土壤水分运动研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(8): 3277-3279.
[11] 李道西, 罗金耀. 地下滴灌土壤水分运动室内试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2004, 23(4): 26-28.
[12] 宰松梅, 仵峰, 温季, 等. 大田地下滴灌土壤水分分布均匀度评价方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(12): 51-57.
[13] 刘晓英, 杨振刚, 王天俊. 滴灌条件下土壤水分运动规律的研究[J]. 水利学报, 1990(1): 11-22.
[14] 张志刚, 李宏, 李疆, 等. 地表滴灌条件下滴灌量对土壤水分入渗、再分布过程的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2016, 37(1): 174-181.
[15] 雷呈刚. 新疆棉田多点源滴灌条件下土壤水分运移特性试验研究[J]. 吉林水利, 2016(3): 18-21.
[16] 李敏敏, 安贵阳, 郭燕, 等. 不同灌溉方式对渭北果园土壤水分及水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011(4): 174-179.
[17] 刘梅先, 杨劲松, 李晓明, 等. 膜下滴灌条件下滴水量和滴水频率对棉田土壤水分分布及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 12: 3203-3210.
[18] 宋淑亚, 刘文兆, 王俊, 等. 覆盖方式对玉米农田土壤水分、作物产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012(2): 210-212.
[19] Kader, M.A., Senge, M., Mojid, M.A., Nakamura, K., et al. (2017) Mulching Type-Induced Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes and Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Rain-Fed Condition in Central Japan. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 8, 302-308.
[20] Yang, J., Mao, X., Wang, K., et al. (2017) The Coupled Impact of Plastic Film Mulching and Deficit Irrigation on Soil Water/Heat Transfer and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat in Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 12, 232-245.
[21] 孟春红, 夏军. “土壤水库”储水量的研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2004(4): 8-10.
[22] Xu, C., Tao, H., Tian, B., et al. (2016) Limited-Irrigation Improves Water Use Efficiency and Soil Reservoir Capacity through Regulating Root and Canopy Growth of Winter Wheat. Field Crops Research, 7, 268-275.
[23] 李俊, 毕华兴, 李笑吟, 等. 有序聚类法在土壤水分垂直分层中的应用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2007(1): 98-101.
[24] 俱战省, 郑粉莉, 刘文兆. 黄土高原南部小流域土壤水分时程变化的分层特征及其驱动机制[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013(1): 28-33.
[25] 高鹭, 陈素英, 胡春胜, 等. 喷灌条件下农田土壤水分的空间变异性研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002(6): 609-615.
[26] 高鹭, 胡春胜, 陈素英. 喷灌条件下冬小麦根系分布与土壤水分条件的关系[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2006(1): 5-8.
[27] 李朝阳, 夏建华, 王兴鹏. 低压微润灌灌水均匀性及土壤水分分布特性[J]. 节水灌溉, 2014(9): 9-12.
[28] 吴程, 胡顺军, 赵成义. 塔里木灌区膜下滴灌棉田土壤水分动态与耗水特性[J]. 节水灌溉, 2016(2): 14-17.
[29] 孔繁宇, 胡同军. 棉田地下滴灌土壤水分变化及需水规律初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005(1): 323-325.
[30] 杨苏龙, 石跃进, 齐宏力, 等. 滴(渗)灌土壤水分移动规律研究初报[J]. 山西农业科学, 1997(1): 47-50.
[31] 金世杰, 费良军, 傅渝亮. 土壤水分再分布特性研究进展[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2016(3): 251-259.
[32] 张梅琳. 应用统计学(第二版)[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2009: 38-146.