大学生自我概念与生涯发展的关系
The Relationship between Self-Concept and Career Development among College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.91003, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 程 玮:广东培正学院创新创业教育学院,广东 广州
关键词: 自我概念生涯发展大学生教育建议Self-Concept Career Development College Students Educational Suggestion
摘要: 研究采用《田纳西自我概念量表(大学生版)》和李亚真修订的《大学生生涯发展量表》,对北京、广州、西安和洛阳的8所高校共1015名大学生进行调查,旨在探究大学生自我概念、生涯发展的特点及其二者间的关系。结果发现:自我概念发展仅在兼职经历方面存在显著差异,而生涯发展在兼职经历、学生干部方面存在显著差异;大学生自我概念与生涯发展呈现正相关,自我概念总体水平对大学生生涯发展8个具体因子均有一定的预测力,其中对生涯成熟、生涯态度、生涯行动有较高的预测力。据此推测,自我概念是影响大学生生涯发展的重要因素。
Abstract: 1015 college students from 8 universities from Beijing, Guangzhou, Xi’an and Luoyang were sur-veyed through “Tennessee Self-Concept Scale” (University Student Edition) and “Student Career Development Scale” revised by Li (2005) to detect the features and relations between college students’ self-concept and their career development. The findings are following: the significant differences in self-concept development only exist in part-time experience, but the obvious differences in career development exist not only in part-time experience but also student cadres; the self-concept of college students is positively correlated with career development. The overall level of self-concept has a certain predictive power for the eight specific factors of college students’ career development, among which there is a high predictive power for career maturity, career attitude, and career action. Based on the analysis, self-concept is a vital factor to impact the career development.
文章引用:程玮 (2019). 大学生自我概念与生涯发展的关系. 心理学进展, 9(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.91003

参考文献

[1] 程玮, 陈艳(2018). 大学生心理健康与发展. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社.
[2] 李亚真(2005). 大学生生涯发展的相关因素研究. 硕士论文, 福州: 福建师范大学.
[3] 吕林海, 龚放(2018). 中美研究型大学本科生深层次学习及其影响机制的比较研究. 教育研究, (4), 111-120.
[4] 万德智(2007). 大学生自我概念发展特点及其应对方式的相关性研究. 硕士论文, 济南: 山东大学.
[5] 占颖玉(2007). 自我概念对大学生生涯发展影响的研究. 硕士论文, 厦门: 厦门大学.
[6] 赵晓霞(2012). “90后”大学生自我自我概念、群体身份认同以及关系的研究. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[7] Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (2010). Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of Work. Applied Psychology, 48, 49-71.[CrossRef