三江自然保护区5月浮游植物功能群研究及水质评价
Study on Phytoplankton Functional Group and Water Quality Evaluation in May of Sanjiang Nature Reserve
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2019.91003, PDF,   
作者: 潘海峰, 于洪贤*, 马成学:东北林业大学,黑龙江 哈尔滨 ;柴方营, 于 婷:黑龙江省节约用水技术中心,黑龙江 哈尔滨;鞠永富:黑龙江省水文局,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 三江自然保护区浮游植物多样性指数功能群Sanjiang Nature Reserve Phytoplankton Diversity Index Functional Group
摘要: 为研究分析三江自然保护区浮游植物多样性,从2017年春季对三江自然保护区的16个采样点采集浮游植物样品,进行系统分析,为湿地水质评价奠定基础。分析这16个样点浮游植物功能群的组成特征,共划分出18个功能群,其中重要的功能群为MP和Y功能群,分别占58.9%和13.7%。通过Shanno-Weaver多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数对三江自然保护区的水质进行评价,多数采样点处于轻度或无污染状态,整体水质较为良好,但需要即时监测浮游植物动态变化。RDA分析结果显示,影响春季浮游植物功能群最重要的理化因子为Chla、pH和Cond,其次为 ,浮游植物功能群WS、D和MP与叶绿素呈正相关,浮游植物功能群W1、P和H1与叶绿素呈负相关。浮游植物功能群Y、S1、TB和C与pH、硝酸根呈正相关,而L0、J、X1、X2、F和N功能群等与理化环境因子的相关性不明显。
Abstract: In order to study and analyze the diversity of phytoplankton in Sanjiang Nature Reserve, phyto-plankton samples were collected from 16 sampling points of Sanjiang Nature Reserve in the spring of 2017, and systematic analysis was carried out to lay a foundation for wetland water quality evaluation. The composition characteristics of these 16 sample phytoplankton functional groups were analyzed, and 18 functional groups were divided. The important functional groups were MP and Y functional groups, accounting for 58.9% and 13.7%, respectively. The Shanno-Weaver di-versity index and the Pielou evenness index evaluate the water quality of the Sanjiang Nature Re-serve. Most of the sampling points are in a mild or non-polluting state, and the overall water quality is relatively good, but the dynamic changes of phytoplankton need to be monitored immediately. The results of RDA analysis showed that the most important physical and chemical factors affecting the phytoplankton functional group were Chla, pH and Cond, followed by  ; phytoplankton functional groups WS, D and MP were positively correlated with chlorophyll; phytoplankton functional groups W1, P and H1 are negatively correlated with chlorophyll. The phytoplankton functional groups Y, S1, TB and C were positively correlated with pH and nitrate, while the correlations between L0, J, X1, X2, F and N functional groups and physical and chemical envi-ronmental factors were not obvious.
文章引用:潘海峰, 于洪贤, 马成学, 柴方营, 于婷, 鞠永富. 三江自然保护区5月浮游植物功能群研究及水质评价[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2019, 9(1): 10-16. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2019.91003

参考文献

[1] Reynolds, C.S. (2010) Phytoplankton Assemblages and Their Periodicity in Stratifying Lake Systems. Ecography, 3, 141-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Grime, J.P. (1977) Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 崔花淑, 朴正顺, 申晓明, 等. 黑龙江三江保护区的野生动物资源[J]. 野生动物学报, 1999(6): 8-9.
[4] 周洁敏. 对黑龙江三江国家级自然保护区的评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2001(5): 58-64.
[5] 袁家辉, 孙常乐. 浮游植物评价颍河水质污染研究[J]. 阜阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2004, 21(3): 46-49 + 61.
[6] 胡晓红, 陈椽, 李银燕, 向刚, 刘美珊. 以浮游植物评价百花湖水质污染及富营养化[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1999(4): 1-7.
[7] 郭沛涌, 林育真, 李玉仙. 东平湖浮游植物与水质评价[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 1997(4): 37-42.
[8] 杨毕铖, 陈章飞, 戴红, 韩朝国, 颜露露. 厦门湾浮游植物分布现状和水质状况评价[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2018, 35(9): 88-93.
[9] 梁辉朝, 吕俊. 桂林青狮潭水库浮游藻类状况及水质评价[J]. 广西水利水电, 2018(5): 60-63.
[10] Reynolds, C.S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C., et al. (2002) Towards a Functional Classification of the Freshwater Phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 417-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Kruk, C., Mazzeo, N., Lacerot, G., et al. (2002) Classification Schemes for Phy-toplankton: A Local Validation of a Functional Approach to the Analysis of Species Temporal Replacement. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 901-912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 杨丽, 张玮, 尚光霞, 张军毅, 王丽卿, 魏华. 淀山湖浮游植物功能群演替特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(7): 3158-3167.
[13] 王徐林, 张民, 殷进. 巢湖浮游藻类功能群的组成特性及其影响因素[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(2): 431-440.