共情与网络利他行为——有调节的中介模型
Empathy and Internet Altruistic Behavior—A Moderated Mediation Model
摘要: 采用问卷调查法，收集了481名大学生的数据，探讨了共情对网络利他行为的影响，以及社会责任的中介作用和性别的调节效应。结果表明：1) 共情与社会责任、网络利他行为均存在显著的正相关，社会责任与网络利他行为存在显著的正相关；2) 共情对网络利他行为有显著的正向预测作用；3) 社会责任在共情和网络利他行为间起部分中介作用；4) 该中介效应受到性别的调节，即社会责任的中介效应在男生中更为显著。因此，大学生共情通过社会责任影响网络利他行为，其作用在男生中更明显。
Abstract: A self-reported questionnaire survey was conducted to collect 481 college students’ data. The purpose of this study was to explore whether social responsibility mediated the relationship be-tween empathy and internet altruistic behavior, and whether this mediating process was mod-erated by gender. The results showed that: 1) empathy was positively correlated with both social responsibility and internet altruistic behavior, social responsibility was also positively correlated with internet altruistic behavior; 2) empathy had a positive effect on internet altruism behavior; 3) social responsibility partially mediated the relationship between empathy and internet altruism behavior; 4) the mediating effect of social responsibility was moderated by gender, and this mediating effect was stronger for males than that for females. These results indicate that college students with high empathy are more likely to make internet altruistic behavior, because of their high social responsibility. As a result, empathy can influence internet altruism behavior by social responsibility, which was stronger in males.
文章引用：张小丽, 赵永萍, 高雪梅 (2019). 共情与网络利他行为——有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 9(2), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.92029

参考文献

[1] 陈思静, 马剑虹(2011). 第三方惩罚与社会规范激活——社会责任感与情绪的作用. 心理科学, (3), 670-675.
[2] 程岭红(2002). 青少年学生责任心问卷的初步编制. 硕士论文, 重庆: 西南师范大学.
[3] 侯玉波, 乐国安, 张智勇等(译) (2006). 社会心理学(. 北京: 人民邮电出版社. (戴维?迈尔斯, 2006).
[4] 黄四林, 韩明跃, 张梅(2016). 人际关系对社会责任感的影响. 心理学报, 48(5), 578-587.
[5] 蒋怀滨, 郑婉丽, 马松, 肖威龙, 张斌(2016). 大学生网络利他行为与共情、网络社会支持的关系研究. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 31(3), 132-138.
[6] 雷雳(2016). 互联网心理学:新心理与行为研究的兴起. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[7] 李文辉, 李婵, 沈悦, 但菲(2015). 大学生共情对利他行为的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 571-577.
[8] 刘勤学, 陈武, 周宗奎(2015). 大学生网络使用与网络利他行为: 网络使用自我效能和性别的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 685-693.
[9] 宋琳婷(2012). 大学生移情、社会责任心与内隐、外显利他行为的关系. 硕士论文, 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学.
[10] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
[11] 谢园梅(2015). 网络利他行为与青少年道德品质关系的质性研究. 硕士论文, 赣州: 赣南师范学院.
[12] 张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳(2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155-157.
[13] 赵欢欢, 张和云, 刘勤学, 王福兴, 周宗奎(2012). 大学生特质移情与网络利他行为: 网络社会支持的中介效应. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 478-486.
[14] 郑显亮(2010). 大学生网络利他行为: 量表编制与多层线性分析. 博士论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[15] 郑显亮, 王亚芹(2017). 青少年网络利他行为与主观幸福感的关系——一个有中介的调节模型. 心理科学, 40(1), 70-75.
[16] 郑显亮, 张婷, 袁浅香(2012). 自尊与网络利他行为的关系: 通情的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(4), 550-551.
[17] 郑显亮, 赵薇(2015a). 共情、自我效能感与网络利他行为的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(2), 358-361.
[18] 郑显亮, 赵薇(2015b). 中学生网络利他行为与希望的关系: 自我效能感与自尊的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 428-436.
[19] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[20] Barnett, M. A., Howard, J. A., King, L. M., & Dino, G. A. (1981). Helping Behavior and the Transfer of Empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 125-132.[CrossRef] 
[21] Batson, C. D. (2008). Empathy-Induced Altruistic Motivation. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial Motives, Emotions, and Behavior: The Better Angels of Our Nature (pp. 15-34). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
[22] Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107-122.[CrossRef] 
[23] Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., & Aldeguer, C. M. R. (1995). Empathy and the Collective Good: Caring for One of the Others in a Social Dilemma. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 619-631.[CrossRef] 
[24] Davis, M. H. (1980). A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-104.
[25] Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119.[CrossRef] 
[26] Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & Witte, H. D. (2018). Feel Good, Do Good Online? Spillover and Crossover Effects of Happiness on Adolescents’ Online Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 1-18.[CrossRef] 
[27] Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & Witte, H. D. (2016). Nice or Naughty? The Role of Emotions and Digital Media Use in Explaining Adolescents’ Online Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior. Media Psychology, 20, 374-400.[CrossRef] 
[28] Han, L., Xu, J., Bian, Y., Gao, F., & Ren, Y. (2016). Effects of Problem Characteristics on the Online Helping Behavior of Shy Individuals. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 531-536.[CrossRef] 
[29] Khang, H., & Jeong, I. (2016). Perceived Self and Behavioral Traits as Antecedents of an Online Empathic Experience and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 888-897.[CrossRef] 
[30] Lister, K. M. (2007). Aggression and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescents’ Internet and Face-to-Face Interactions. Electronic Thesis or Dissertation.
[31] Maliki, A. E., Asain, E. S., & Kebbi, J. (2010). Background Variables, Social Responsibility and Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students in Bayelsa State of Nigeria. Studies on Home and Community Science, 4, 27-32.[CrossRef] 
[32] Nakamura, M., & Watanabe-Muraoka, A. M. (2006). Global Social Responsibility: Developing a Scale for Senior High School Students in Japan. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28, 213-226.[CrossRef] 
[33] Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High Cost Helping Scenario: The Role of Empathy, Prosocial Reasoning and Moral Disengagement on Helping Behavior. Personality & Individual Differences, 55, 3-7.[CrossRef] 
[34] Sanmartin, M. G., Carbonell, A. E., & Ba?os, C. P. (2011). Rela-ciones entre empatia, conducta prosocial, agresividad, autoeficacia y responsabilidad personal y social de los escolares. Psicothema, 23, 13-19.
[35] Steffgen, G., K?nig, A., Pfetsch, J., & Melzer, A. (2011). Are Cyberbullies Less Empathic? Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Behavior and Empathic Responsiveness. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14, 643-648.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2010). Altruism or Psychological Escape: Why Does Empathy Promote Prosocial Behavior? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 649-665.[CrossRef] 
[37] Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct. New York: Guilford.
[38] Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The Developmental Roots of Social Responsibility in Childhood and Adolescence. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 134, 11-25.[CrossRef] [PubMed]