替代计量学的研究进展与应用
Altmetrics: Research Developments and Applications
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2019.81026, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 刘 禹:中央财经大学,宣传部、新闻中心,北京;林琦钰, 关 蓉:中央财经大学,统计与数学学院,北京;朱婧池:中央财经大学,体育经济与管理学院,北京
关键词: 替代计量学文献计量学术成果评价替代计量指标Altmetrics Bibliometrics Evaluation of Academic Achievements Altmetric Indicator
摘要: 随着网络时代发展而产生的新型网络媒介(如微博和微信公众号等),为学术成果的传播提供了更为便捷的渠道,其阅读量、转发量等数据亦能反映学术成果的社会影响力。在此背景下,仅凭传统的文献计量方法来衡量学术成果的影响力是不够全面的。美国信息学教授J. Priem于2010年提出了一种基于社交网络的学术成果评价计量方法Altmetrics,中文译作“替代计量学”。本文从三个方面介绍替代计量学的发展状况:首先,梳理替代计量学的发展历史,明确其定义及与传统计量学的区别;其次,回顾国内外相关研究,总结该领域研究存在的问题与挑战;最后,以altmetric.com为例,介绍替代计量学的实际应用情况。
Abstract: With the development of network era, networks as a new medium, such as Weibo and WeChat official account, provide a more convenient channel for the dissemination of academic achieve-ments. Meanwhile, the amounts of reading or sharing reflect the social influence of academic achievements. In this context, it is neither comprehensive nor precise enough to measure the in-fluence of academic achievements only by traditional bibliometric methods. In 2010, J. Priem, a professor of informatics from the United States, proposed a social-network-based measurement method for academic achievement evaluation, namely Altmetrics. This paper introduces the de-velopment of Altmetrics from three aspects. Firstly, we provide a history of establishment and development for Altmetrics, and discuss the difference between Altmetrics and traditional bibli-ometric methods. Secondly, we review the relevant research in domestic and foreign and sum-marize the problems and challenges in this field. Finally, we introduce the actual application of Altmetrics by taking the website of altmetric.com as an example.
文章引用:刘禹, 林琦钰, 关蓉, 朱婧池. 替代计量学的研究进展与应用[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2019, 8(1): 175-181. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2019.81026

参考文献

[1] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19): 5-12.
[2] Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., et al. (2016) Altmetrics: A Manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
[3] Haustein, S., Costas, R. and Lariviã¨Re, V. (2015) Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns. Plos One, 10, e0120495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Ronald, F. (2013) A Multi-Metric Approach for Research Evaluation. Science Bulletin, 58, 3288-3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] NISO (2016) Altmetrics Definitions and Use Cases. https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/16268
[6] 陈和. 替代计量学与传统计量学比较研究[J]. 中国教育网络, 2015(6): 68-70.
[7] Jensen, M. (2007) The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, 1.
[8] Priem, J. and Hemminger, B.H. (2010) Scientometrics 2.0: New Metrics of Scholarly Impact on the Social Web. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
[9] 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14): 52-56.
[10] 张亻民, 赵文华, 孙保存. 从编辑的视点探讨科技期刊Altmetrics的重要性[J]. 编辑之友, 2013(9): 41-43.
[11] 邱均平, 张心源, 董克. Altmetrics指标在机构知识库中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015(2): 100-105.
[12] 王贤文, 方志超, 胡志刚. 科学论文的科学计量分析: 数据、方法与用途的整合框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015(16): 74-82.
[13] 余厚强, Hemminger, B., 肖婷婷, 等. 新浪微博替代计量指标特征分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016(4): 20-36.
[14] 卫垌圻, 谭宗颖. Altmetrics国内外研究中的问题与挑战[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(2): 93-99.
[15] 韩毅. 中文学术成果评价的Altmetrics发展及实践路径[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(1): 81-86.
[16] 王妍, 郭舒, 张建勇. 学者影响力评价指标的相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015(5): 106-112.