基于犹豫模糊不确定语言信息的群决策方法在城市综合管廊风险评估中的应用
Group Decision Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Information and Its Application in Risk Assessment of Urban Comprehensive Pipeline
摘要: 多属性决策是现代决策分析领域中一个重要的研究方向,作为多属性决策的重要组成部分,以犹豫模糊不确定语言为决策环境的决策问题已经被广泛地应用到各行各业中。本文针对城市地下综合管廊建设风险问题,以犹豫模糊不确定语言为评估环境,运用最大偏差法确定在评估过程中涉及到的风险评估指标和专家的权重信息,对城市地下综合管廊建设待试点的城市进行建设风险评估,使用TOPSIS方法对待试点城市进行综合评估的排序,为我国开展城市地下综合管廊建设试点城市的选取提供决策依据。
Abstract: Multiple attribute decision making is an important research direction in the field of modern deci-sion analysis. As an important part of multiple attribute decision making, multiple attribute deci-sion making with hesitant fuzzy and uncertain linguistic as decision environment has been widely applied to all walks of life. This paper is aimed at the risk of urban underground integrated pipe gallery construction, using hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic as the evaluation value of decision making and the maximum deviation method to determine the risk assessment indicators and ex-pert’s weight information involved in the assessment process to conduct the city underground comprehensive pipeline corridor construction pilot cities construction risk assessment, and using the TOPSIS method to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the pilot cities, and then select the most suitable city as a pilot city for the construction of underground comprehensive pipeline cor-ridors.
文章引用:时志刚, 毛小兵, 揭欣勇. 基于犹豫模糊不确定语言信息的群决策方法在城市综合管廊风险评估中的应用[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2019, 9(1): 93-106. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2019.91011

参考文献

[1] Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information Control, 8, 338-356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Atanassov, K. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Atanassov, K. and Gargov, G. (1989) Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31, 343-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Miyamoto, S. (2001) Fuzzy Multisets and Their Generalizations. The Workshop on Multiset Processing: Multiset Processing, Mathematical, Computer Science, and Molecular Computing Points of View, Springer-Verlag, 353, 225-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mizumoto, M. and Tanaka, K. (1976) Some Properties of Fuzzy Sets of Type 2. Information & Control, 31, 312-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Torra, V. (2010) Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Xia, M. and Xu, Z. (2011) Hesitant Fuzzy Information Aggregation in Decision Making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, 395-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Torra, V. and Narukawa, Y. (2009) On Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Decision. The 18th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Fuzz-LEEE, IEEE, 1378-1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Rodriguez, R.M., Martí Nez, L. and Herrera, F. (2012) Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20, 109-119.
[10] Lin, R., Zhao, X. and Wei, G. (2014) Models for Selecting an ERP System with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 26, 2155-2165.
[11] Xu, Z. (2004) Uncertain Linguistic Aggregation Operators Based Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making under Uncertain Linguistic Environment. Information Sciences, 168, 171-184.
[12] Zheng, X.M. (2015) Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Information and Their Application for Evaluating the College English Teachers’ Professional Development Competence. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems Applications in Engineering & Technology, 28, 1243-1250.
[13] Huo, Z.G. and Zhou, Z.G. (2015) Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28, 991-998.
[14] Yang, H. and Xiang, C.Z. (2017) Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on the Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Information and Their Applications to Teaching Quality Evaluation in Higher Education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India, 3, 1-7.
[15] Zhao, X., Yang, L. and Wang, L. (2016) Models for Evaluating the Resource Integration Capability of Textile Enterprise with Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Information. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 31, 2001-2008.
[16] Wei, G. (2016) Interval Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 7, 1093-1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Zadeh, L.A. (1975) The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Applications to Approximate Reasoning. Information Sciences, 8, 301-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Sugeno, M. (1974) Theory of Fuzzy Integral and Its Application. Doctorial Dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.
[19] Sugeno, M.M. (1993) Some Quantities Represented by the Choquet Integral. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 56, 229-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Marichal, J.L. (2000) An Axiomatic Approach of the Discrete Choquet Integral as a Tool to Aggregate Interacting Criteria. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8, 800-807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Meng, F., Zhang, Q. and Cheng, H. (2013) Approaches to Multiple-Criteria Group De-cision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Choquet Integral with Respect to the Generalized λ-Shapley Index. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 237-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Wang, Y. (1998) Using the Method of Maximizing Deviation to Make Decision for Multi-Indices. System Engineering and Electronics, 7, 24-26.