气候变化背景下中国潜在颠覆性低碳技术识别及其分布特征研究——基于专利被引次数的POT模型
Study on the Identification and Distribution Characteristics of Potential Subversive Low Carbon Technology in China under the Background of Climate Change—Pot Model Based on the Number of Times of Citations
DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2019.81002, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张财经*, 王为东, 卢 娜：江苏大学财经学院，江苏 镇江
关键词: 颠覆性创新；低碳技术；专利被引次数；POT模型；——基于专利被引次数的POT模型
摘要: 颠覆性低碳技术创新是深入实施创新驱动战略，推动全社会低碳转型的重要手段。基于EPO与USPTO联合公布的CPC-Y02低碳专利分类，首次采用POT模型对中国2004~2013年264,444件低碳技术专利的被引次数进行分析，识别潜在的颠覆性低碳技术，并分析技术的领域与地域分布特征。结果显示，中国潜在颠覆性低碳技术专利共计306件，约占申请总量的千分之一；此类技术专利主要集中于建筑业、污染处理、产品生产、交通、能源等5个与经济社会发展高度相关领域，而在温室气体处理这一高技术领域则存在明显短板；地域上约60%颠覆性技术专利产生于北京、江苏、广东、山东、上海等5个东部省市，且呈现出较其他一般专利更为集聚的特征。
Abstract: Disruptive low-carbon technological innovation is an important means to further implement the in-novative driven development and promote the low-carbon transformation of the whole society. Based on the CPC-Y02 classification jointly published by EPO and USPTO, the POT model is used for the first time to analyze forward citation number of 264,444 low-carbon patents in 6 fields and the potential disruptive low-carbon technology in China from 2004 to 2013. Furthermore, the regional distribution characteristics of patents are analyzed. The results showed that 306 potential disruptive low-carbon technologies are selected, accounting for about 1/1000 of the total low-carbon patent applications. At present, these patents are mainly concentrated in the areas of construction, commodity production, transportation, energy and so on, highly related to economic development in China. But there are obvious shortages in the high-tech domain of greenhouse gas treatment. These patents geographically concentrate on 5 eastern provinces and cities, including Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong and Shanghai, and show a more concentrated feature than other general patents.
文章引用：张财经, 王为东, 卢娜. 气候变化背景下中国潜在颠覆性低碳技术识别及其分布特征研究——基于专利被引次数的POT模型[J]. 低碳经济, 2019, 8(1): 8-18. https://doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2019.81002

参考文献

[1] Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harper Business, New York.
[2] Christensen, C.M. (2010) The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 39-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 克里斯坦森, 等. 困境与出路[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2004.
[4] Christensen, C.M. (2003) The Innovator’s Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Busi-ness. Harper Business, New York.
[5] Hart, S. and Christensen, C.M. (2002) The Great Leap: Driving Innovation From the Base of the Pyramid. Sloan Management Review, 44, 51-56.
[6] Chang, C.H., Elizabeth, G. and Yi, R. (2015) Opportunities for Disruption. Technovation, 39-40, 83-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Schuster, T. (2014) Govindarajan, V., Trimble, C., Reverse Innovation: Create Far from Home, Win Everywhere, Harvard Business Review Press, 2012. Management International Review, 54, 277-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Immelt, J.R., Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2009) How GE Is Disrupting Itself. Harvard Business Review, 35, 56-65.
[9] Berkhout, F., Smith, A. and Stirling, A. (2003) Socio-Technological Regimes and Transition Contexts. Edward Elgar, 48-75.
[10] Tyfield, D. and Jin, J. (2010) Low-Carbon Disruptive Innovation in China. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China, 2, 269-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Geels, F.W., Sovacool, B.K., Schwanen, T., et al. (2017) Sociotechnical Transitions for Deep Decarbonization. Science, 357, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Shackley, S. and Green, K. (2007) A Conceptual Framework for Exploring Tran-sitions to Decarbonised Energy Systems in the United Kingdom. Energy, 32, 221-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Jeroen, C.J.M., van den Bergh, Truffer, B. and Kallis, G. (2011) Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions: Introduction and Overview. Environmental Innovation & Societal Transitions, 1, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] López, F.J.D. and Montalvo, C. (2015) A Comprehensive Review of the Evolving and Cumulative Nature of Eco-Innovation in the Chemical Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 30-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Beerepoot, M. and Beerepoot, N. (2007) Government Regulation as an Impetus for Innovation: Evidence from Energy Performance Regulation in the Dutch Residential Building Sector. Energy Policy, 35, 4812-4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Yu, D. and Hang, C.C. (2011) Creating Technology Candidates for Disruptive Innovation: Generally Applicable R&D Strategies. Technovation, 31, 401-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Klenner, P., Hüsig, S. and Dowling, M. (2013) Ex-Ante Evaluation of Disruptive Susceptibility in Established Value Networks—When Are Markets Ready for Disruptive Innovations? Research Policy, 42, 914-927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 万小丽. 专利质量指标中“被引次数”的深度剖析[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(1): 68-73.
[19] 张军荣. 开放式创新能提升专利质量吗[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(11): 103-109.
[20] 张杰, 等. 基于诉讼专利的专利质量评价方法研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(5): 138-146.
[21] Castaldi, C.C. and Los, B. (2012) Are New “Silicon Valleys” Emerging? The Changing Distribution of Superstar Patents across US States.
[22] Castaldi, C., Frenken, K. and Los, B. (2015) Re-lated Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An Analysis of US State-Level Patenting. Regional Studies the Journal of the Regional Studies Association, 49, 767-781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Trajtenberg, M. (1990) A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 172-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C.M. (2001) Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough In-ventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521-543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Singh, J. and Fleming, L. (2010) Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality. Management Science, 56, 41-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Hall, B., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2001) The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Silverber, G. and Verspagen, B. (2007) The Size Distribution of Innovations Revisited: An Application of Extreme Value Statistics to Citation and Value Measures of Patent Significance. Journal of Econometrics, 139, 318-339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 卓志, 王伟哲. 巨灾风险厚尾分布: POT模型及其应用[J]. 保险研究, 2011(8): 13-19.
[29] Horn, G. and Tokarski, K. (2016) Disruptime!—Guidance towards Radical and Disruptive Innovation. Springer, Wiesbaden.
[30] Adner, R. (2002) When Are Technologies Disruptive? A Demand-Based View on the Emergence of Competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 667-688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Su, H.N. and Moaniba, I.M. (2017) Does Innovation Respond to Climate Change? Empirical Evidence from Patents and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 122, 49-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] 陆亦恺, 张善杰, 刘晓琴. CPC专利分类在海事节能减排技术研发态势分析中的应用研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(7): 139-144, 138.
[33] 花拥军, 张宗益. 基于峰度法的POT模型对沪深股市极端风险的度量[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(5): 786-796.
[34] 桂文林, 徐芳燕. 广义Pareto分布尾部厚度的分析与应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2009, 285(6): 153-155.
[35] Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. (1997) Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2001) Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 10, 975-1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐