低碳创新及其组合对碳排放作用的空间外部性研究
Study of Spatial Externalities of Low-Carbon Innovation and Its Portfolio on Carbon Emissions
摘要: 有效利用低碳技术是应对气候变化的重要途径。以2006~2015年中国30个省级面板数据为研究范围，采用空间杜宾模型，实证研究低碳创新及其组合对碳排放的作用机制。研究显示，低碳创新与碳排放在空间分布上存在一定偏差；更具突破性的低碳创新作用高于增量创新，但两类创新的组合作用最显著；城市化、产业结构以及FDI等引致碳排放增加，而环境规制对碳排放的抑制作用仍限于本地。这就要求既要协同不同类型创新活动，又要协同不同区域低碳治理。
Abstract: The effective use of low-carbon technologies is an important way to combat climate change. The paper adopts spatial Durbin model to empirically study the mechanism of low-carbon innovation and its portfolio on carbon emissions with 30 provincial panel data of China from 2006 to 2015. The research shows that the spatial distribution of low-carbon innovation and carbon emissions has a certain deviation. And the breakthrough low-carbon innovation plays a bigger role than the incremental innovation, but the combination of the two types of innovation plays the most signifi-cant role; Urbanization, industry structure and FDI lead to increased carbon emissions, while the impact of environmental regulations on carbon emissions is still limited to local areas. This requires the collaboration of different types of innovation activities and the collaboration of different regional low-carbon governance.
文章引用：王淼, 王为东, 卢娜, 张财经. 低碳创新及其组合对碳排放作用的空间外部性研究[J]. 低碳经济, 2019, 8(1): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2019.81003

参考文献

[1] 姜彤, 李修仓, 巢清尘, 等. 《气候变化 2014: 影响、适应和脆弱性》的主要结论和新认知[J]. 气候变化研究发展, 2014(3): 157-166.
[2] Feng, K. and Hubacek, K. (2006) Carbon Implications of China’s Urbanization. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 1, 39-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L. (2007) Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445-459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 马志云, 刘云. 应对气候变化关键技术创新差异的时空格局[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2017, 27(9): 102-111.
[5] Gerlagh, R. (2007) Measuring the Value of Induced Technological Change. Energy Policy, 35, 5287-5297 . [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Acemoglu, D., Ghion, P., Bursztyn, L., et al. (2009) The Environment and Directed Technical Change. NBER Working Paper, No. 15451.
[7] Acs, Z.J., Anselin, L. and Varga, A. (2002) Patents and Inno-vation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069-1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Leonidou, L.C., Leonidou, C.N., Fotiadis, T.A. and Aykol, B. (2015) Dynamic Capabilities Driving an Eco-Based Advantage and Performance in Global Hotel Chains: The Moderating Effect of International Strategy. Tourism Management, 50, 268-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Lerner, J. (1994) The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 319-333.
[10] Nagaoka, S. (2007) Assessing The R&D Management of a Firm in Terms of Speed and Science Linkage: Evidence From the US Patents. Journal of Economics&Management Strategy, 16, 129-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Lanjouw, J.O. and Schankerman, M. (2004) Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. The Economic Journal, 495, 441-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Yueh, L. (2009) Patent Laws and Innovation in China. International Review of Law and Economics, 29, 304-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Van Zeebroeck, N. (2010) The Puzzle of Patent Value Indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 33-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C.M. (2001) Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521-543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Trajtenberg, M. (1990) A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 172-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Akkermans, D.H.M., Castaldi, C. and Los B. (2009) Do “Liberal Market Economies” Really Innovation More Radically than “Coordinated Market Economies”? Research Policy, 38, 181-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Phone, A.K. and Fladmoe-Linquist, L.M. (2006) Breakthrough Innovations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: The Effects of Technological Space and Geographic Origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 369-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 周五七, 聂鸣. 中国碳排放强度的下降: 结构效应和专利效用[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 6(34).
[19] Richmound, A. and Kaufman, R.K. (2006) Is There a Turning Point in the Relationship between Income and Energy Use and/or Carbon Emission. Ecological, 56, 176-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] 李国志, 李宗植. 人口、经济和技术对二氧化碳排放的影响分析——基于动态面板模型[J]. 人口研究, 2010(3): 32-39.
[21] 朱勤, 彭希哲, 陆志明, 于娟. 人口与消费对碳排放影响的分析模型与实证[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2010(2): 98-102.
[22] Anselin, L. (2001) Spatial Effects in Econometric Practice in Environmental and Resource Economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 705-710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] 李国平, 王春扬. 我国省域创新产出的空间特征和时空演化——基于探索性空间数据分析的实证[J]. 地理研究, 2012(1): 95-106.
[24] 程叶青, 王哲野, 张守志, 等. 中国能源消耗碳排放强度及其影响因素的空间计量[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(10): 1418-1431.
[25] Blan, Y., He, P. and Xu, H. (2013) Estimation of Potential Energy Saving and Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction in China Based on an Extended Non-Radical DEA Approach. Energy Policy, 63, 962-971.
[26] 万小丽. 专利质量指标中“被引次数”的深度剖析[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(1): 68-73.

为你推荐