低饱和度油藏产水率测井预测技术研究
The Method Study of Water-Cut Prediction of Low Oil Saturation Reservoir by Well Logging
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.92011, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 刘海涛, 王成荣, 王 鹏, 吴 都:中国石油集团测井有限公司吐哈分公司,新疆 鄯善;韩 成, 李留中, 陈 杰:中国石油吐哈油田公司勘探开发研究院,新疆 哈密;张超谟*:长江大学,湖北 武汉
关键词: 台北凹陷西山窑组低含油饱和度产水率Taibei Sag Xishanyao Formation Low Oil Saturation Watercut Rate
摘要: 吐哈盆地台北凹陷低含油饱和度油藏资源丰富,目前已在西山窑组、三工河组发现了低含油饱和度油藏,多口井获得了工业或低产油气流,这种储层的生产特点是油水同出,且能够长期稳产,产水率受油藏含油饱和度控制。利用测井资料准确评价油层饱和度是解决现场生产的关键。本文以红台、温吉桑构造带西山窑组为样本,通过岩心刻度测井,基于岩心物理实验,结合薄片、压汞、核磁实验等资料深入开展储层微观特征研究,建立有效储层的分类标准、评价方法及参数模型。提高了饱和度的计算精度,建立了产水率预测模型和图版,依据产水率的高低,进一步细化油水同层的分类标准,提出完井和试油方案,成果应用于新井解释、老井复查和油藏评价中取得了显著效果,累计新增三级石油地质储量1400多万吨,有效指导了油气勘探与开发。
Abstract: Taibei sag of Tuha basin has rich in petroleum resources in the reservoir with low oil saturation. Oil and gas with commercial value or with low production in many drilled wells have produced from the Xishanyao formation and Sangonghe formation which are the low oil saturation reservoir. The production character of the reservoir is not only a long-term and stable oil production but also water production. Water-cut rate is controlled by the oil saturation. Therefore, accurately evaluate reservoir saturation with well logging data is the key to solve the field production. Currently, the main problem is: to log evaluation of reservoir physical properties and the change of formation water, and oil and water layer difference is not obvious; saturation calculation difficulties; pre-production and production change are big and middle water rate prediction is difficult, unable to effectively guide the production. This study takes Xisanyao formation of Hongtai and Wenjisang structural belt as an example. The method is calibration logging with core, based on the core physical experiment, combined with thin section, mercury injection and NMR experiment etc., to study reservoir microscopic characteristics, to establish effective reservoir classification standard, evaluation method and the model of reservoir parameters. The calculation precision of the saturation is improved. Watercut rate prediction model and chart are established, further refining oil-water classification standard. Well completion and test scheme is put forward. The application in new wells’ evaluation and old wells’ re-evaluation made significant effect, accumulated total of new third-grade oil geological reserves of more than 1400 × 104 tons, and effectively guided the oil and gas exploration and production.
文章引用:刘海涛, 韩成, 王成荣, 李留中, 陈杰, 王鹏, 吴都, 张超谟. 低饱和度油藏产水率测井预测技术研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(2): 85-94. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.92011

参考文献

[1] 王兴刚. 红台地区低饱和度油藏特征及开发对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2017.
[2] 屈乐. 牛圈湖油田储层微观孔隙结构及注水开发特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2010.
[3] 李留中, 韩成, 陈杰, 等. 红台构造带低饱和油藏测井评价[J]. 吐哈油气, 2016, 21(2): 101-106
[4] Zheng, M., Li, J.Z., Wu, X.Z., et al. (2016) Physical Modeling of Oil Charging in Tight Reservoirs: A Case Study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 43, 241-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 海东明. 小洼油田洼38块东二段低含油饱和度油藏成因研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2011, 18(1): 54-57.
[6] 刘俊田, 陈旋, 季卫华, 等. 红台地区西山窑组低饱和度油气藏成因机理研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2017, 31(4): 17-21.
[7] 孙志刚. 低含油饱和度砂岩油藏水驱特征实验[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(2): 106-107.
[8] 刘柏林, 李治平, 匡松远, 等. 低含油饱和度油藏油水渗流特征——以准噶尔盆地中部1区块为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2001, 14(1): 69-72.
[9] 戴胜群, 徐勋诚, 洪秀娥, 等. 低饱和度油藏原始饱和度计算及含水上升规律[J]. 海洋石油, 2011, 31(4): 0068-0072.
[10] 刘洪亮, 鱼红侠, 崔红珠, 等. 红台地区低孔低渗储层测井流体识别方法研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2007, 29(3): 93-96.
[11] 向斌. 红台构造带轻质油储集层核磁共振录井解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(1): 55-60.
[12] 吴兆徽, 刘西雷, 梁金萍, 等. 岩心油水饱和度误差形成主要原因及投影校正法[J]. 当代化工, 2015, 44(12): 2866-2869.
[13] 孙建孟, 王永刚. 地球物理资料综合应用[M]. 东营: 石油大学出版社, 2001.
[14] Archie, G.E. (1941) The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics. SPE-942054-G.
[15] Worthington, P.F., Pallatt, N. and Toussaint-Jackson, J.E. (1989) Influence of Microporosity on the Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Saturation. SPE Formation Evaluation, 4, SPE 14296-PA.
[16] 白松涛, 万金彬, 杨锐祥, 等. 地层水电阻率评价方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(2): 0566-0578.
[17] Hikmet, U., Iraj, E. and Gary, R.O. (1980) Electrical Resistivity of Geothermal Brines. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32, SPE 7878-PA.
[18] Michael, D., Jennifer, K., Lerrys, R. and Luis, M. (2016) Whole-Rock Elemental Data as an Aid in Log Interpretation: Low-Resistivity Reservoir Case Study. SPE 181170-MS.