公司司法解散事由之“股东利益受到重大损失”认定研究
Research on the Identification of “The Heavy Losses of Shareholders’ Interests” in Judicial Dissolution of a Company
摘要:
《公司法》对公司之司法解散事由认定三要件中,“公司继续存续会使股东利益受到重大损失”的规定过于模糊和原则化,相关规范性文件对此也未进行细化解释,给实务工作带来一定阻碍。本文以笔者所代理的杭州市某村级留用地建设项目公司司法解散纠纷为例,结合对村留地建设项目公司特殊性的分析,认为在村级留用地建设项目公司司法解散纠纷中,关于股东利益受到重大损失的认定,应将村级集体经济组织成员生计来源补偿之利益以及项目合作协议约定纳入考量因素范围。
Abstract:
As one of the three elements of the company’s judicial dissolution prescribed by China’s “Company Law” and related normative documents, the provision on “the shareholders may suffer heavy losses if the company continues to exist” is too principled and vague, and causes obstacles to practical work. This paper takes the judicial disbandment dispute of a project company in Hangzhou which was established to construct a village-level retained land as an example, and combines the analysis of the particularity of such company. It is considered that in such disputes, the interests of the members of the village-level collective economic organization and the project cooperation agreement should be included in the scope of consideration when determining whether “the shareholders may suffer heavy losses if the company continues to exist”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李公科. 解读公司司法解散[J]. 法制与社会, 2008(28): 86-87.
|
|
[2]
|
李建伟. 司法解散公司事由的实证研究[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(4): 117-137.
|
|
[3]
|
李一川, 薛东. 农村集体经济留用地开发模式与开发方案的研究[J]. 学理论, 2010(15): 3.
|
|
[4]
|
周延飞. 农村集体经济研究若干问题探讨[J]. 区域经济评论, 2018(6): 1-10.
|
|
[5]
|
林星, 吴春梅. 农村股份经济合作社治理结构、机制与模式[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(6): 1052-1058.
|
|
[6]
|
徐芸. 公司司法解散法定事由的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2018.
|
|
[7]
|
钱卫清. 公司诉讼司法救济方式[M]. 北京: 北京人民法院出版社, 2006: 105.
|
|
[8]
|
罗曙光. 项目合同解除与项目公司解散的衔接处理[J]. 厦门广播电视大学学报, 2015, 18(2): 57-59.
|
|
[9]
|
赵万一. 公司治理法律问题研究[M]. 北京: 北京法律出版社, 2004: 80-81.
|