流动人口幸福感及与生存质量的相关性研究
A Study of Well-Being, the Correlation between Well-Being and Quality of Life among Floating Population
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.93063, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈炜倩, 栗大娜, 丁巧燕, 李万娇, 程潇琦, 邢海燕:绍兴文理学院医学院,浙江 绍兴
关键词: 流动人口幸福感生存质量The Floating Population Well-Being Quality of Life
摘要: 基于《综合幸福感问卷》 (MHQ)量表和SF-12生存质量量表进行实证研究,分析比较流动人口与城市居民幸福感的差异,探索流动人口幸福感与生存质量的相关性,为提高流动人口幸福感提供参考依据。结果显示:城市居民主观幸福感(SWB)、友好关系得分高于流动人口,负性情感得分流动人口高于城市居民,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。流动人口幸福感与躯体健康和心理健康方面以及多个维度得分存在相关性(p < 0.05)。幸福感与生存质量存在正相关,可通过提高流动人口生存质量提升其幸福感。
Abstract: Based on Multiple Happiness Questionnaire (MHQ) scale and SF-12 health-related quality of life scale, this essay analyzed and compared the difference of the well-being between floating population and urban residents, to explore the correlation between happiness and quality of life of floating population, and to provide a reference for improving the well-being of floating population. The results showed: In the score of urban residents’ Subjective Well-being (SWB), friendly relationship was higher than that of floating population, but negative emotion score of the former was lower than the latter. There was significant difference (p < 0.05). There was a correlation between well-being and quality of life included physical health, mental health and scores of most domains among floating population (p < 0.05). There was positive correlation between the well-being and quality of life. We can improve happiness by improving the quality of life of floating population.
文章引用:陈炜倩, 栗大娜, 丁巧燕, 李万娇, 程潇琦, 邢海燕 (2019). 流动人口幸福感及与生存质量的相关性研究. 心理学进展, 9(3), 510-514. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.93063

参考文献

[1] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会流动人口司(2016). 中国流动人口发展报告2016 (页3-9). 北京: 中国人口出版社.
[2] 苗元江(2003). 心理学视野中的幸福—幸福感理论与测评研究(页53-62). 博士论文. 南京: 南京师范大学.
[3] 严标宾, 郑雪, 邱林(2004). SWB和PWB: 两种幸福感研究取向的分野与整合. 心理科学, 27(4), 836-838.
[4] 袁爱清(2014). 媒介学视野下新生代农民工幸福感的研究——基于焦点小组法的实证研究. 江西青年职业学院学报, 24(3), 5-11.
[5] 张莎, 田晋, 刘巧兰, 等(2011). 流动人口SF-12生命质量量表信度, 效度评价. 中国公共卫生, 27(2), 226-227.