中国背景下正念与主观幸福感关系的Meta分析
Meta Analysis of the Relationship between Mindfulness and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Context
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.93068, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 珊, 车晓萍, 蔡 磊, 黄佳敏：山西医科大学，山西 太原；宋旭红：山西医科大学第二医院，山西 太原
关键词: 正念；主观幸福感；Meta分析；调节效应；Mindfulness； Subjective Well-Being； Meta Analysis； Regulating Effect
摘要: 采用元分析的方法探讨中国背景下正念与主观幸福感的关系及影响二者关系的调节因素。通过文献检索，共获得25篇文献，36个独立效应量和11,313名被试。异质性检验表明，选择随机效应模型比较合适；出版偏差检验表明元分析不存在发表偏差；主效应检验发现，正念与主观幸福感呈中等程度的正相关(r = 0.189, p < 0.001)；调节效应检验表明，二者关系受出版年代、男性被试量、主观幸福感测量方式和被试群体类型的调节。
Abstract: Meta-analysis was used to explore the relationship between mindfulness and subjective well-being in Chinese context and the regulatory factors affecting their relationship. Through literature retrieval, a total of 25 articles, 36 independent effects and 11,313 subjects were obtained. Heterogeneity test showed that random effect model was suitable, publishing deviation test showed that there was no publication deviation in meta-analysis; the main effect test showed that there was moderate positive correlation between mindfulness and subjective well-being (r = 0.189, p < 0.001). The adjustment effect test showed that the relationship between the two was regulated by the age of publication, the amount of male subjects, the way of subjective well-being measurement and the type of population of the subjects.
文章引用：王珊, 宋旭红, 车晓萍, 蔡磊, 黄佳敏 (2019). 中国背景下正念与主观幸福感关系的Meta分析. 心理学进展, 9(3), 544-551. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.93068

参考文献

[1] 曾巍, 钱小芳(2017). 正念对护士职业倦怠与主观幸福感的中介及调节作用. 护理学杂志, 32(2), 73-76.
[2] 陈灿锐, 高艳红,申荷永(2012). 主观幸福感与大三人格特征相关研究的元分析. 心理科学进展, 20(1), 19-26.
[3] 陈盈盈, 黄小华, 陈文婷(2017). 正念、时间充裕感与主观幸福感的关系. 心理学进展, 7(7), 883-887.
[4] 胡博松(2017). 大学生正念水平与主观幸福感的关系: 抑郁、自我控制的中介和调节作用. 硕士论文, 成都: 四川师范大学.
[5] 李娜(2016). 自然联结对大学生幸福感的影响: 正念的中介作用. 硕士论文, 北京: 北京林业大学.
[6] 刘斯漫, 刘柯廷, 李田田, 卢莉(2015). 大学生正念对主观幸福感的影响:情绪调节及心理弹性的中介作用. 心理科学, 38(4), 889-895.
[7] 郑明华(2013). Meta分析软件应用与实例解析. 北京: 人民卫生出版社.
[8] Cheung, M. W. (2015). metaSEM: An R Package for Meta-Analysis Using Structural Equation Modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521.
[9] Diener, E. (1994). Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157.[CrossRef] 
[10] Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 391-406.[CrossRef] 
[11] Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.[CrossRef] 
[12] Hofmann, W. (2005). A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some Reflections on the Origins of MBSR, Skillful Means, and the Trouble with Maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 281-306.[CrossRef] 
[14] Kuppens, S., Laurent, L., Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2013). Associations between Parental Psychological Control and Relational Aggression in Children and Adolescents: A Multilevel and Sequential Meta-Analysis. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1697-1712.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2000). Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[16] Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zeidan, F., Gordon, N. S., Merchant, J., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). The Effects of Brief Mindfulness Meditation Training on Experimentally Induced Pain. The Journal of Pain, 11, 199-209.[CrossRef] [PubMed]