|
[1]
|
Bauman, C. W., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Cubist Consequentialism: The Pros and Cons of an Agent-Patient Template for Morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 129-133.[CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Epley, C. J. T. (2007). On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864-886.[CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[4]
|
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science, 315, 619.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[5]
|
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124.[CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.[CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66.[CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, Culture, and Morality, or Is It Wrong to Eat Your Dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.[CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Kohlberg, L. (1971). From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral Development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Psychology and Genetic Epistemology (pp. 151-235). New York: Academic Press.[CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral Psychology Is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[11]
|
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2017). The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 1-39.
|
|
[12]
|
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “Big Three” of Morality (Autonomy, Community, and Divinity), and the “Big Three” Explanations of Suffering. In Morality and Health (pp. 119-169). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
|
[13]
|
Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2004). The Continuity of Mind: Toward a Dynamical Account of Cognition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 87-142). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
|
|
[14]
|
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). The Role of Intent for Distinct Moral Domains. Cognition, 120, 202-214.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|