综合护理干预对肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭的护理疗效及护理满意度
Nursing Effect and Nursing Satisfaction of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Pulmonary Heart Disease Complicated with Chronic Respiratory Failure
摘要:
目的:探讨综合护理干预对肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭的护理疗效和护理满意度的影响。方法:选择本院呼吸科2015年7月~2018年9月收治的132例肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者,以随机序列软件奇偶数法分为参照组和干预组各66例,参照组采取呼吸科基础护理,干预组采取综合护理,观察比较两组患者护理效果和满意度。结果:干预组总有效率高于参照组,P < 0.05;干预组并发症发生率低于参照组,P < 0.05。干预组0例死亡,参照组2例死亡,两组死亡率比较无统计学意义,P > 0.05;干预组QOL评分、6 min步行试验距离、FEV1、FVC、PEF、FEV1/FVC均高于参照组,P < 0.05;干预组护理满意度高于参照组,P < 0.05。结论:综合护理干预对肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者临床治疗可起到巩固和提高的辅佐作用,并能降低并发症和死亡风险,提高患者生存质量和护理满意度,值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective: To study the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the nursing and nursing satisfaction of patients with cor pulmonale complicated with chronic respiratory failure. Methods: 132 cases of cor pulmonale and 66 cases of chronic respiratory failure from July 2015 to September 2018 were selected and divided into the reference group and the intervention group. Results: The total effective rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the reference group (P < 0.05), and the incidence of complications in the intervention group was lower than that of the reference group (P < 0.05). There were 0 deaths in the intervention group and 2 deaths in the reference group. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05); QOL score, 6-minute walking distance, FEV1, FVC, PEF, FEV1/FVC in the intervention group were higher than those in the reference group (P < 0.05); nursing satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that in the reference group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The comprehensive nursing intervention can strengthen and improve the clinical treatment of patients with cor pulmonale and chronic respiratory failure, reduce the risk of complications and death, improve the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients, and is worthy of clinical application.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘宗美. 综合性护理干预在肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2018, 24(7): 85-87.
|
|
[2]
|
陈信义, 赵进喜. 内科常见病规范化诊疗方案[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2015: 78-79.
|
|
[3]
|
刘艳丽. 老年肺心病合并呼吸衰竭的综合护理干预对策探讨[J]. 中国保健营养, 2016, 26(11): 528-528.
|
|
[4]
|
秦文. 100例肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭患者实施整体护理的效果观察[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2017, 24(12): 141-142.
|
|
[5]
|
刘庆镭, 叶顺群. 6分钟步行试验对慢性心力衰竭患者康复训练的指导作用研究[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2015, 36(2): 83-84.
|
|
[6]
|
邸娜. 肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭的护理研究[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(31): 245-246.
|
|
[7]
|
李楠. 探讨老年肺心病合并呼吸衰竭的综合护理[J]. 中国保健营养, 2016, 26(1): 194.
|
|
[8]
|
韦妮娜, 刘德先, 熊秋萍. 老年肺心病合并呼吸衰竭的综合护理效果[J]. 当代医学, 2018, 24(7): 38-40.
|
|
[9]
|
陈红娟, 陈全红. 综合护理干预对老年肺心病合并呼吸衰竭患者预后的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018, 3(1)168-169.
|
|
[10]
|
朱晨, 宰梅玲. 老年肺心病合并呼吸衰竭患者的临床护理对策[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版), 2017, 17(48): 201.
|
|
[11]
|
何洁月, 李素容, 陈柯. 中西医结合综合护理干预在慢性肺心病中的应用效果观察[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2016, 31(4): 611-614.
|
|
[12]
|
王严仪, 肖金玲. 综合护理干预对肺心病合并慢性呼吸衰竭的护理效果及护理满意度[J]. 中国临床研究, 2018, 31(1): 140-142.
|