输入假设与输出假设对英语教学的启示
Enlightenment of Input Hypothesis and Output Hypothesis on English Teaching
摘要:
针对二语习得的研究,美国语言学家克拉申在儿童第一语言的习得基础上提出了备受争议的输入假设,强调可理解性输入在语言习得中的核心地位。对此,斯温纳持不同看法,提出了以“沉浸式教学”实践为基础的输出假设。两种假设看似对立,实则是以语言习得的不同角度为出发点。二者皆对外语教学具有重大启发。
Abstract:
For the study of second language acquisition, American linguist Krashen put forward controver-sial input hypothesis on the basis of children's first language acquisition, emphasizing the central position of intelligible input in language acquisition. Swanner holds different opinions and puts forward output hypothesis based on immersion teaching practice. The two hypotheses seem to be contradictory, but in fact they are based on different perspectives of language acquisition. Both of them have great implications for foreign language teaching.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Ellis, R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition [M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2004.
|
|
[2]
|
Swain, M. (1995) Three Functions of Output in Second Language Learning. In: Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B., Eds., Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 125-127.
|
|
[3]
|
王烈琴, 李建魁. 克拉申的输入假设与斯温纳的输出假设的比较研究[J]. 宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2009, 29(2): 87-91.
|
|
[4]
|
陈蓓, 吴延东. 二语习得领域的语言输入研究综述[J]. 内蒙古电大学刊, 2007(5): 52-53.
|
|
[5]
|
何广铿. 英语教学法基础[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2002.
|