蜂巢砌块挡土墙结构安全性分析
Safety Analysis of Retaining Wall Structure in Honeycomb Block
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2019.83052, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 张 雄:同济大学材料科学与工程学院,高分子材料系,上海;张晓平:长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司工程建设分公司,湖北 武汉;齐宣博, 李南生:同济大学土木工程学院水利工程系,上海
关键词: 蜂巢砌块挡土墙土压力接触应力土拱现象Retaining Wall in Honeycomb Block Soil Pressure Contact Stress Soil Arching Phenomenon
摘要: 蜂巢砌块挡土墙是一种生态型挡土墙,从结构上来看它结合了重力式挡墙和悬臂式挡墙的优点,具有施工快速简便、质量可控、外形美观,而且具有极佳的生态效应等优点。本文应用有限元法分析蜂巢砌块挡土墙墙背土和结构之间的非线性接触压力分布,从而确认这种生态挡墙的结构稳定性。结果表明,蜂巢砌块挡土墙墙背土压力会发生土拱现象,1/3高度附近土压力高于主动土压力,但是土压力合力以及作用点和库伦主动土压力基本一致。墙体应力分布和悬臂梁受弯类似,砌块拼接处会发生应力集中。
Abstract: Retaining wall in Honeycomb block is an ecological retaining wall. It combines the advantages of gravity retaining wall and cantilever retaining wall from the structural point of view. It has the advantages of quick and convenient construction, controllable quality and beautiful appearance, and excellent ecological effects and other advantages. In this paper, the finite element method is used to analyze the nonlinear contact stress distribution between the soil and the structure of the retaining wall in honeycomb block to confirm the structural stability of the ecological retaining wall. The results show that the soil arching phenomenon occurs in the soil pressure behind the retaining wall of the honeycomb block. The soil pressure near the height of 1/3 retaining wall is higher than the active earth pressure, but the combined force of the soil pressure and the action point and the Coulomb active earth pressure are basically the same. The stress distribution of the wall is similar to that of the cantilever beam, and stress concentration occurs at the joint of the block.
文章引用:张雄, 张晓平, 齐宣博, 李南生. 蜂巢砌块挡土墙结构安全性分析[J]. 土木工程, 2019, 8(3): 447-456. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2019.83052

参考文献

[1] SL379-2007. 水工挡土墙设计规范[S].
[2] 吕凤梧. 深基坑施工过程多支撑挡土墙动态可靠度计算[J]. 工业建筑, 2003, 33(7): 1-5.
[3] 邢肖鹏. 挡土墙土压力有限元模拟分析[J]. 山西水利科技, 2002, 146(4): 1-3.
[4] 苏利亚. 二级悬臂式挡土墙的力学分析[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2017, 40(5): 10-11.
[5] 施小平. 悬臂式挡土墙抗滑稳定性分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2015, 13(1): 108-112.
[6] 陈忠达, 汪东升. 悬锚式挡土墙有限元分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2005, 22(1): 38-41.
[7] 邓楚建, 何国杰. 基于M-C准则的D-P系列准则在岩土工程中的应用研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(6): 736-739.
[8] 王先军, 陈明祥. Drucker-Prager系列屈服准则在稳定分析中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(12): 3734-3738.
[9] 王国田, 罗雪贵. 滑坡-抗滑桩土拱效应三维数值模拟研究[J]. 路基工程, 2018, 199(4): 90-94.
[10] 吴昌将, 张子新. 边坡工程中抗滑桩群桩土拱效应的数值分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007, 3(7): 1305-1333.
[11] 王诚, 石少卿. 基于法向应力突变的组合式钢管抗滑桩土拱效应模型试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(10): 1671-1815.