“肉夹馍”之名流行的构式动因
The Constructional Motivation Making the Name "Marinated Meat in Baked Bun" (Rougamo) Popular among the Public
摘要: 有人认为“肉夹馍”表示“肉夹着馍”,既不合逻辑又不合语法,应改为“馍夹肉”或者“夹肉馍”。本文基于Goldberg提出的构式语法理论,指出“肉夹馍”属于“A + V + M”类构式,有其构式形式和构式义方面的特征。该构式的词汇具有多功能性,是构式压制的结果,这是本文用于解答“肉夹馍”之名争议的关键。同时,该构式词汇开放程度高、可替换性强的特征使其具有高能产性。在认知层面,该构式同人们认知方式的形成、发展相一致,符合大众的认知心理,因而得以在民间广泛使用和流传。
Abstract: Some individuals argue that “rougamo” means “The meat is stuffed with a pan-cake”, which is neither logical nor grammatical. It should be changed to “pan-cake stuffed with meat”. Based on the theory of Construction Grammar proposed by Goldberg, this paper indicates that “rougamo” belongs to the “A + V + M” type of construction, possessing the characteristics of its construction form and construction meaning. Besides, the construction coercion results in the lexical versatility of the construction, as is expected to solve the controversy about the name of “rougamo”. Meanwhile, “A + V + M” type of construction is featured by its high degree of openness and substitutability, making it highly productive. At the cognitive level, this construction is consistent with the formation and development of people’s cognitive mode and conforms to the public's cognitive psychology. Consequently, it can be widely used and spread among the people.
文章引用:邓佳欣. “肉夹馍”之名流行的构式动因[J]. 现代语言学, 2019, 7(2): 125-130. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2019.72016

参考文献

[1] 田惠刚. 肉夹馍小议[J]. 语文建设, 1995(12): 32.
[2] 刘继超. “肉夹馍”:一种特殊的语言现象[J]. 人文杂志, 1997(2): 119-121.
[3] 付佩. 关于“肉夹馍”的几点思考[J]. 语文学刊, 2014(12): 47-48.
[4] [美]Adele E. Goldberg, 著. 构式——论元结构的构式语法研究(Construction—A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure) [M]. 吴海波, 译, 冯奇, 审定. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 4-24.
[5] 陆俭明. 关于构式语法理论[Z]. 2009年全国语言学暑期高级讲习班讲义, 2009.
[6] 王寅. 构式压制、词汇压制和惯性压制[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009(12): 5-9.
[7] 杨锡彭. “肉夹馍”、“冰糖葫芦”的结构层次[J]. 语言文字周报, 2012(10): 1.
[8] 严辰松. 构式语法概要[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2004(4): 6-11.
[9] 王寅. 认知语法概论[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2006: 32-34.