不同林型对中小型土壤动物多样性的影响
Effects of Different Forest Types on Meso-Micro Soil Faunal Diversity
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2019.72014, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王伟杰, 李晓强*, 聂荣元, 高 瑞, 张 西, 代益嘉:长春师范大学城市与环境科学学院,吉林 长春
关键词: 林型中小型土壤动物多样性龙湾国家级自然保护区Forest Type Meso-Micro Soil Fauna Diversity Longwan National Nature Reserve
摘要: 不同林型由于植被,土壤等环境因子的差异会影响土壤动物的群落结构。在吉林龙湾国家级自然保护区,选取蒙古栎林、杂木林、红松人工林、长白落叶松人工林四个典型生境,研究不同林型对中小型土壤动物多样性的影响。结果表明:本研究共获取中小型土壤动物630个,隶属于6纲12目16科。阔叶林土壤动物个体数明显多于针叶林,在种类上阔叶林也略多。节跳虫科和甲螨亚目是四个生境共同优势类群。单因素方差分析表明,7月份红松人工林节跳科个体密度显著高于蒙古栎林(P < 0.05)。10月份杂木林节跳科个体密度显著高于红松人工林(P < 0.05)。主成分分析表明不同林型对土壤动物优势类群和常见类群影响较大。典范对应分析表明土壤相对湿度和土壤腐殖质是影响不同林型土壤动物群落多样性的主要土壤因子。不同林型对土壤动物多样性的影响要考虑土壤和植被等因素的综合作用。
Abstract: Vegetation, soil and other environmental factors of different forest types affect the soil faunal di-versity in surrounding soil. In the present study, an investigation about the composition and di-versity of the soil meso-micro fauna and its relationship with soil factors was conducted in Longwan National Nature Reserve. Sampling sites were conducted in Quercus mongolica forest, miscellaneous wood forest, Pinus koraiensis plantations and Larix olgensisi plantations in May, July and October 2018. A total of 630 individuals belong to 6 classes, 12 orders, 16 families. Quercus mongolica forest, miscellaneous wood forest had a higher abundance and richness of soil meso-micro fauna, when compared with Pinus koraiensis plantations and Larix olgensisi plantations. Isotomidae and Oribatida were the dominant groups in all forest types. A significantly higher abundance of Isotomidae was evident in Pinus koraiensis plantations than Quercus mongolica forest at months 7 of the experiment (P < 0.05). Miscellaneous wood forest showed significantly higher abundance of Isotomidae than Pinus koraiensis plantations at months 10 of the experiment (P < 0.05). Principal component analysis results showed the effect of different forest types on dominant and common groups of soil meso-micro fauna. The canonical correspondence analysis results showed that soil meso-micro faunal diversity was significantly correlated with soil relative humidity and soil humus in different forest types. Effects of different forest types on meso-micro soil faunal diversity need to consider soil and vegetation factors, as well as by the interactions.
文章引用:王伟杰, 李晓强, 聂荣元, 高瑞, 张西, 代益嘉. 不同林型对中小型土壤动物多样性的影响[J]. 土壤科学, 2019, 7(2): 112-120. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2019.72014

参考文献

[1] 殷秀琴, 陶岩, 王海霞, 马辰, 寇新昌, 许还, 崔东. 我国东北森林土壤动物生态学研究现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(10): 1083-1090.
[2] Yin, X.Q., Song, B., Dong, W.H., et al. (2010) A Review on the Eco-Geography of Soil Fauna in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 333-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 董炜华. 内蒙古公路路域土壤动物群落特征及其在生态恢复中的作用研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2008.
[4] 王富斌. 土壤动物对长白山针阔混交林主要凋落物分解作用的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2012.
[5] 李晓强, 殷秀琴, 孙立娜. 松嫩草原不同演替阶段大型土壤动物功能类群特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(2): 442-450.
[6] 靳亚丽. 天童常绿阔叶林凋落物层跳虫群落的生态学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2011.
[7] 马宏彬, 刘惠清. 拉萨河流域不同土地利用方式下土壤动物的群落特征[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2012, 44(2): 84-90.
[8] 张晓光, 殷秀琴, 顾卫, 董满宇. 长白山区公路边坡人工植草后土壤动物群落特征[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2011, 43(4): 111-117.
[9] Laiho, R., Silvan, N., Cárcamo, H. and Vasander, H. (2001) Effects of Water Level and Nutrients on Spatial Distribution of Soil Mesfauna in Peatlands Drained for Forestry in Finland. Applied Soil Ecology, 16, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[11] 郑乐怡, 归鸿. 昆虫分类[M]. 南京: 南京师范大学出版社, 1999.
[12] 钟觉民. 幼虫分类学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
[13] 殷秀琴. 东北森林土壤动物研究[M]. 长春: 东北师范大学出版社, 2001.
[14] Kumada, K., Sato, O., Ohsumi, Y. and Ohta, S. (1967) Humus Composition of Maintain Soil in Central Japan with Special Reference to the Distribution of P Type Humic Acid. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 13, 151-158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 窦森. 土壤有机质[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[16] 张雪萍, 曹会聪, 冯仲科. 大兴安岭森林生态系统中小型土壤动物生态地理特征分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2007, 29(S2): 259-265.
[17] 殷秀琴, 吴东辉, 韩晓梅. 小兴安岭森林土壤动物群落多样性的研究[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(3): 316-322.
[18] 仲伟彦, 殷秀琴, 陈鹏. 帽儿山不同林型土壤动物的对比研究[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 1998(1): 74-79.
[19] 张雪萍. 帽儿山针叶林与针阔叶混交林土壤动物对比研究I区系组成与特征[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 1995,11(2): 94-99.
[20] 林英华, 孙家宝, 刘海良, 张夫道, 孙龙, 金森. 黑龙江帽儿山土壤动物群落组成与多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(4): 71-77.
[21] 殷秀琴, 蒋云峰, 陶岩, 安静超, 辛未冬. 长白山红松阔叶混交林土壤动物生态分布[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(8): 935-940.
[22] 孙立娜, 李晓强, 殷秀琴, 单昱. 龙湾自然保护区森林土壤动物群落多样性及功能类群[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2014, 46(1): 110-116.
[23] Coleman, D.C. (2008) From Peds to Paradoxes: Linkages between Soil Biota and Their Influences on Ecological Processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 271-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Mikola, J., Yeates, G.W., Wardle, D.A., et al. (2001) Response of Soil Food-Web Structure to Defoliation of Different Plant Species Combinations in an Experimental Grassland Community. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 205-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Wardle, D.A., Bonner, K.I. and Barker, G.M. (2002) Linkages between Plant Litter Decomposition, Litter Quality, and Vegetation Responses to Herbivores. Functional Ecology, 16, 585-595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef