循证护理模式在计划生育手术患者护理中的效果分析
Analysis on the Effect of Evidence-Based Nursing Model in the Nursing of Patients Undergoing Family Planning Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/NS.2019.82019, PDF,   
作者: 赵月英*:枣庄市山亭区妇幼保健院,山东 枣庄
关键词: 循证护理计划生育效果满意度Evidence-Based Nursing Family Planning Effect Satisfaction
摘要: 目的:分析计划生育手术患者护理中实施循证护理模式的效果。方法:选择我院2016年3月~2018年3月诊治的88例计划生育手术患者,随机分成研究组(44例)和对照组(44例),对照组进行常规护理,研究组实施循证护理,比较两组临床效果。结果:研究组护理后SDS评分(17.63 ± 6.31)分、SAS评分(12.62 ± 3.83)分,低于对照组(P < 0.05);研究组排气时间(18.12 ± 5.87) h、下床活动时间(9.87 ± 3.24) h、住院时间(4.62 ± 0.75) d,优于对照组(P < 0.05);研究组护理过程(85.63 ± 4.72)分、护理技术(85.36 ± 4.46)分、服务态度(86.16 ± 4.23)分、健康教育(85.71 ± 4.06)分、护理效果(85.21 ± 4.37)分,高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:循证护理模式应用于计划生育手术患者效果显著,可解除其负性心理,减短住院时长,提升护理满意度。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of evidence-based nursing for patients undergoing family planning operations. Methods: Eighty-eight patients undergoing family planning surgery in the Hospital between March 2016 and March 2018 were selected, and the patients were randomly di-vided into a study group (n = 44) and a control group (n = 44): the control group received routine nursing and the study group was given evidence-based nursing. The clinical effects in the two groups were compared. Results: After treatment, the SDS score and SAS score in the study group were respectively (17.63 ± 6.31) points and (12.62 ± 3.83) points, both lower than those in the con-trol group (P < 0.05). The time for exhaust, time for getting-out-of bed, and the length of hospital stay in the study group were (18.12 ± 5.87) h, (9.87 ± 3.24) h and (4.62 ± 0.75) days, all shown to be better than the control group (P < 0.05). The scores on nursing process, nursing technique, service attitudes, health education and nursing effects in the study group were respectively (85.63 ± 4.72) points, (85.36 ± 4.46) points, (86.16 ± 4.23) points, (85.71 ± 4.06) points and (85.21 ± 4.37) points, all shown to be higher than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For patients undergoing family planning surgery, evidence-based nursing is significant effect, which can help relieve their negative psychology, shorten the length of hospital stay and improve the satisfaction to nursing.
文章引用:赵月英. 循证护理模式在计划生育手术患者护理中的效果分析[J]. 护理学, 2019, 8(2): 94-98. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2019.82019

参考文献

[1] 张建英. 舒适护理在计划生育手术患者中的应用效果探析[J]. 吉林医学, 2015, 36(15): 3451-3451.
[2] 李俊晓. 对实施计划生育手术患者进行心理护理的临床效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2016, 11(8): 251-252.
[3] 崔现果. 计划生育手术妇女的心理分析及护理[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2016, 29(5): 1024-1026.
[4] 李俊晓. 计划生育手术患者焦虑程度评估及其护理方案分析[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2016, 8(11): 263-264.
[5] 李清, 彭凌. 计划生育手术患者焦虑程度评估及护理方法研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(13): 1875-1877.
[6] 陈蓓. 心理护理对实施计划生育手术患者的效果分析[J]. 母婴世界, 2015, 7(10): 181-182.
[7] 赵建华. 计划生育受术者的心理护理分析[J]. 心理医生, 2015, 21(21): 190-191.
[8] 刘春玉, 陈学芹, 王俊芳. 心理沟通与干预在妇科门诊计划生育手术中的作用[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(4): 272-273.
[9] 陈杰, 史妙丽, 杨华群,等. 优质护理服务实践模式在中山市人口和计划生育服务中心的应用研究[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志, 2015, 21(z1): 27.
[10] 张东梅, 关婷, 谢燕芳, 等. 健康宣教结合舒适护理对计划生育妇女焦虑感及认知程度的影响[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2016, 24(13): 83-84.
[11] 岳彩虹, 王新华, 曹嫚. 计划生育手术患者的心理问题分析及护理干预措施研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2014, 12(6): 957-959.
[12] 谭凤鸣, 黄宁. 心理护理对实施计划生育手术患者的效果分析[J]. 吉林医学, 2014, 35(21): 4748-4749.
[13] 徐嘉, 陈玉霞, 杨蕊. 舒适护理在减少计划生育妇女焦虑与抑郁状况的作用[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2014, 35(18): 2766-2767.
[14] 招莉. 舒适护理对计划生育手术患者负面情绪的影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2014, 25(6): 1426-1427.
[15] Hewitt, C.M., Roye, C. and Gebbie, K.M. (2014) Core Competency Model for the Family Planning Public Health Nurse. Public Health Nursing, 31, 472-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]