歧义容忍度对高中生外语学习成绩的影响机制
The Influence Mechanism of Ambiguity Tolerance on Senior High School Students’ Foreign Language Learning Performance
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2019.72036, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 汤璇璇, 冯智文:云南师范大学外国语学院,云南 昆明;李 雄, 郑会杰:云南师范大学教育科学与管理学院,云南 昆明
关键词: 歧义容忍度外语学习成绩中介效应情感过滤理论Ambiguity Tolerance Foreign Language Learning Performance Mediating Effect Affective Filter Theory
摘要: 结合情感过滤理论,探究歧义容忍度对高中生外语学习成绩的影响机制。在云南某高中整群抽取在校生245名,采用歧义容忍度问卷(SLTAS)和外语课堂焦虑量表(FLCAS)进行测试。结果显示,1) 外语课堂焦虑在歧义容忍度影响高中生外语学习成绩的过程中起着完全中介作用;2) 歧义容忍度不能通过课堂发言焦虑和负面评价焦虑影响外语学习成绩,但能通过课堂考试焦虑和一般性焦虑影响外语学习成绩,且两条路径的中介效应大小无显著差异。结论:教师在外语教学中应主动排解学生的焦虑情绪,以课堂发言和课堂互动等综合评价方式取代高强度的课堂考试。
Abstract: Based on the theory of affective filtering, this paper explores the influence mechanism of ambiguity tolerance on senior high school students’ foreign language learning performance. 245 students were selected from a high school in Yunnan province, and Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale (SLTAS) and Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) were used for the test. Results show that 1) Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety plays a complete mediating role in the process of ambiguity tolerance affecting senior high school students’ foreign language learning performance. 2) Ambiguity tolerance cannot affect foreign language learning performance through classroom speaking anxiety and negative evaluation anxiety, but can affect foreign language learning performance through classroom examination anxiety and general anxiety, and there is no significant difference in the mediating effect between the two paths. Conclusions: teachers should take the initiative to relieve students’ anxiety in foreign language teaching and replace high-intensity classroom tests with comprehensive evaluation methods such as classroom speaking and classroom interaction.
文章引用:汤璇璇, 冯智文, 李雄, 郑会杰. 歧义容忍度对高中生外语学习成绩的影响机制[J]. 创新教育研究, 2019, 7(2): 199-206. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2019.72036

参考文献

[1] 师保国, 申继亮, 许晶晶. 模糊容忍性: 研究回顾、现状与展望[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(4): 311-315.
[2] Adrian, F. and Tracy, R. (1995) Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Concept, Its Measurement and Applications. Current Psychology, 14, 179-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Chapple, C. and Roberts, C. (1986) Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning, 36, 27-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Li, H., & He, Q. (2016) Ambiguity Tolerance and Perceptual Learning Styles of Chinese EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 9, 213-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 张庆宗. 歧义容忍度对外语学习策略选择的影响[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2004, 36(6): 457-461.
[6] 常海潮. 学习策略在歧义容忍度和英语水平之间的中介效应研究[J]. 外语界, 2012(2): 81-88.
[7] 黄雪萍. 歧义容忍度对外语学习焦虑的影响: 自我效能感的中介效应研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014(4): 39-42.
[8] 杨晶. 阅读焦虑对歧义容忍度和外语阅读成绩的影响研究[J]. 长江大学学报(社科版), 2014(4): 99-100.
[9] 郑娇. 模糊容忍度与高中生英语阅读焦虑和阅读成绩的相关性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2016.
[10] 张永燕. 外语阅读焦虑在歧义容忍度与英语阅读成绩之间的中介作用研究[J]: [硕士论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2017.
[11] 刘莉. 高职高专学生英语歧义容忍度研究[J]. 继续教育研究, 2011(7): 140-144.
[12] 刘雪娇. 外语学习歧义容忍度、焦虑和英语阅读成绩关系之研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2018.
[13] 郭亚楠. 模糊限制语对缓解高中英语课堂焦虑的效果研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018.
[14] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
[15] 张素敏, 王桂平. 焦虑在歧义容忍度与英语学习成绩之间的中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(4): 64-67.
[16] 柳士顺, 凌文辁. 多重中介模型及其应用[J]. 心理科学, 2009(2): 433-435.
[17] 张涵, 康飞. 基于bootstrap的多重中介效应分析方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2016(5): 75-78.
[18] 李吕梁. 论Krashen二语习得理论对高校英语教学的启示[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2018(33): 58-59.