超声剪切波弹性成像对优化乳腺肿物BI-RADS分类中的临床价值研究
Clinical Value of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in Optimizing the BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses
摘要: 目的:研究超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在优化乳腺肿物BI-RADS分类中的临床价值。方法:以本院2016年1月~2018年4月就诊的100例(106个)乳腺肿物患者为研究对象,均经病理证实,先行常规超声扫描,行常规BI-RADS分类,再行SWE检测,获取定量参数。以病理结果为金标准,比较分析常规BI-RADS分类、SWE参数弹性最大值(Emax)、Emax优化BI-RADS分类后诊断乳腺恶性病变的敏感度、特异度、准确度。结果:病理证实恶性病变42个,良性病变64个;乳腺恶性病变Emax、弹性最小值(Emin)、平均值(Emean)、方差(SD)、弹性比值(Eratio)均显著高于良性病变(P < 0.05);以病理结果为金标准,常规BI-RASD分类诊断乳腺恶性病变敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为92.86%、57.81%、71.70%;受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析Emax、Emin、Emean、SD、Eratio曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.94、0.55、0.88、0.90、0.85;约登指数最大时Emax临界值为61.00 kPa,Emax诊断敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为78.57%、93.75%、87.74%;Emax优化BI-RADS分类调整后诊断乳腺恶性病变敏感度为92.86%、96.87%、94.34%。结论:SWE弹性最大值Emax优化BI-RADS分类能提高乳腺肿物恶性病变诊断特异度及准确度。
Abstract: Objective: To study the clinical value of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in optimizing the BI-RADS classification of breast masses. Methods: A total of 100 patients with 106 breast masses treated in the hospital from January 2016 to April 2018 were enrolled in the study. All masses were confirmed by pathology. The routine ultrasound scan was performed firstly, the conventional BI-RADS classification was performed secondly, and then SWE was performed to get quantitative parameters. With pathological results as the golden standard, the sensitivities, speci-ficities and accuracy areas of the conventional BI-RADS classification, the maximum SWE parameter elasticity (Emax) and Emax optimized BI-RADS classification for the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions were comparatively analyzed. Results: Pathologically 42 malignant lesions and 64 benign lesions were confirmed. The Emax, the minimum elasticity (Emin), mean elasticity (Emean), square de-viation (SD) and elasticity ratio (Eratio) of malignant breast lesions were significantly higher than those of benign lesions (P < 0.05). With pathological results as the golden standard, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional BI-RASD classification for diagnosis of malignant breast lesions were 92.86%, 57.81% and 71.70%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that areas under curves (AUC) of Emax, Emin, Emean, SD and Eratio were 0.94, 0.55, 0.88, 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. When the Jordan index was maximum, the cut-off value of Emax was 61.00 kPa. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Emax were 78.57%, 93.75% and 87.74%. The sensitivities after adjustment of Emax optimized BI-RADS classification for the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions were 92.86%, 96.87% and 94.34%. Conclusion: The SWE maximum elasticity Emax optimized BI-RADS classification can improve the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of malignant breast lesions.
文章引用:张静. 超声剪切波弹性成像对优化乳腺肿物BI-RADS分类中的临床价值研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2019, 9(4): 493-499. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2019.94076

参考文献

[1] Tangeruda, Potapenko, I., Skjerven, H.K., et al. (2015) Radiologic Evaluation of Lumps in the Male Breast. Acta Radiologica, 57, 481-484.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 袁长翮, 魏杰. SWE结合BI-RADS分级对乳腺肿块鉴别诊断价值及其与病理特征关系的研究[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(3): 366-370.
[3] 肖静, 董洋, 张心茹, 等. 超声弹性成像在BI-RADS 3、4级乳腺病变中的诊断价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(8): 553-555, 563.
[4] 彭晓静, 胡彧, 巩海燕, 等. 实时剪切波弹性成像联合超声造影优化乳腺病变BI-RADS分类的价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(6): 400-404.
[5] American College of Radiology (2013) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th Edition, American College of Radiology, Reston, 563-570.
[6] Lee, E.J., Jung, H.K., Ko, K.H., et al. (2013) Diagnostic Performances of Shear Wave Elastography: Which Parameter to Use in Differential Diagnoses of Solid Breast Masses. European Radiology, 23, 1803-1811.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Luo, J., Chen, J.D., Chen, Q., et al. (2016) Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Improved Performance of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Evaluation of Critical Breast Lesions. World Journal of Radi-ology, 8, 610-617.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 彭晓静, 巩海燕, 许迪, 等. 实时剪切波弹性成像和超声造影对BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变诊断效能的对比研究[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2017, 19(8): 510-513.
[9] Ophir, J., Céspedes, I., Ponnekanti, H., et al. (1991) Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues. Ultrason Imaging, 13, 111-134.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Cosgrove, D.O., Berg, W.A., Doré, C.J., et al. (2012) The BE1 Study Group. Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Masses Is Highly Reproducible. European Radiology, 22, 1023-1032.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 史宪全, 李俊来, 李秋洋, 等. 超声剪切波弹性模量参数在评估乳腺良恶性病灶中的应用价值比较[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2015, 37(3): 294-299.
[12] 占海晏, 臧国礼, 金进晓, 等. 超声剪切波弹性成像与超声乳腺影像报告和数据系统对乳腺良恶性肿块的诊断价值[J]. 中国基层医药, 2015, 22(19): 2922-2924.
[13] 陈敏, 刘青, 聂影, 等. 剪切波弹性成像在乳腺实性病变良恶性鉴别中的诊断价值[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2014, 14(36): 7113-7146.
[14] 唐丽娜, 王瑶琴, 陈轶洁, 等. 超声剪切波弹性定量参数在优化乳腺结节BI-RADS分类中的价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(8): 687-690.
[15] Tang, L., Xu, H.X., Bo, X.W., et al. (2014) A Novel Two-Dimensional Quantitative Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Breast Lesions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 8, 10920-10928.