电化学沉积修复过程混凝土超声波速度演化不确定性表征
Uncertainty Characterization of Ultrasonic Velocity Evolution in Concrete Repaired by Electrochemical Deposition
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2019.83069, PDF,   
作者: 丁剑敏, 刘文军:无锡地铁集团有限公司,江苏 无锡;万 凯:中铁一局集团城市轨道交通工程有限公司,江苏 无锡;朱志远:同济大学土木工程材料系,上海
关键词: 电化学沉积混凝土修复超声测量Gauss分布拟合度Electrochemical Deposition Concrete Repair Ultrasonic Measurement Gauss Distribution Degree of Fit
摘要: 电化学沉积修复过程影响因素多,同一批试件的修复效果呈现出波动性特征。本文采用多孔混凝土试件模拟损伤试件开展了电化学沉积修复试验,用超声波速度等手段表征其修复效果,分别使用Gauss分布、Lognormal分布以及Lorentz分布拟合修复过程整体超声波概率演化特征,采用贝叶斯信息准则(BIC准则)与拟合优度可决系数(R2)来评价对应拟合度,结果显示,随着修复过程推进,试件整体超声波速度有增长趋势,但是,同一批试件,在相同的电化学环境设置下,修复效果(超声波速度)呈现随机性特征;拟合度评价显示,对比Lognormal分布以及Lorentz分布,采用Gauss分布更符合修复过程混凝土超声波不确定性的概率表征。
Abstract: The process of electrochemical deposition restoration is influenced by many factors and even the restoration effect of the same batch of specimens presents a fluctuating feature. In this paper, the porous concrete specimens were used to simulate the damage specimen during the process of electrochemical deposition and the ultrasonic velocity was used to characterize the restoration effect. Gauss distribution, Lognormal distribution and Lorentz distribution were used to fit the evolution of the overall ultrasonic velocity and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC criterion) and goodness of fit determination coefficient (R2) were used to evaluate the corresponding goodness of fit. The results showed that the overall ultrasonic velocity of the specimens increased with the progress of the restoration process, but the restoration effect (ultrasonic velocity) of the same batch of specimens presented random characteristics under the same electrochemical environment setting. The fitting degree evaluation showed that compared with the Lognormal distribution and Lorentz distribution, the Gauss distribution was more consistent with the probabilistic characterization of the ultrasonic uncertainty of concrete in the repair process.
文章引用:丁剑敏, 刘文军, 万凯, 朱志远. 电化学沉积修复过程混凝土超声波速度演化不确定性表征[J]. 土木工程, 2019, 8(3): 587-595. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2019.83069

参考文献

[1] Mehta, P.K. (1997) Durability—Critical Issues for the Future. Concrete International, 19, 1-12.
[2] Ryu, J.S. and Otsuki, N. (2005) Experimental Study on Repair of Concrete Structural Members by Electrochemical Method. Scripta Materialia, 52, 1123-1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ryu, J.S. and Otsuki, N. (2002) Crack Closure of Reinforced Concrete by Electro Deposition Technique. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 159-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mohankumar, G. (2005) Concrete Repair by Electrodeposi-tion. Indian Concrete Journal, 79, 57-60.
[5] Monteiro, P. and Ryou, J.S. (2004) Electrodeposition as a Rehabilitation Method for Concrete Materials. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 31, 776-781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhu, H.H., Chen, Q., Yan, Z.G., Ju, J.W. and Zhou, S. (2014) Microme-chanical Model for Saturated Concrete Repaired by Electrochemical Deposition Method. Materials and Structures, 47, 1067-1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Jiang, Z.W., Xing, F., Sun, Z.P. and Wang, P.M. (2008) Healing Effectiveness of Cracks Rehabilitation in Reinforced Concrete Using Electrodeposition Method. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 23, 917-922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, Q., Jiang, Z.W. and Yang, Z.H. (2015) An Experimental Study on the Repair of Deteriorated Concrete by Electrochemical Deposition Method. International Symposium on Systematic Approaches to Environmental Sustainability in Transportation, Fairbanks Alaska, 2-5 August 2015, 87-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kewalramani, G. (2006) Concrete Compressive Strength Pre-diction Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity through Artificial Neural Networks. Automation in Construction, 15, 374-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Braun, H., et al. (1980) A Simple Method for Testing Goodness of Fit in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 42, 53-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Larntz, K. (1978) Small-Sample Comparisons of Exact Levels for Goodness of Fit Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 253-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Constantinopoulos, C., Titsias, M.K. and Likas, A. (2006) Bayesian Feature and Model Selection for Gaussian Mixture Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Ma-chine Intelligence, 28, 1013-1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef