汶川地震地震动持时特性分析
Analysis of Ground Motion Duration Characteristics of Wenchuan Earthquake
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.95044, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 马小燕*:青岛理工大学琴岛学院,山东 青岛;周正华:南京工业大学,江苏 南京;黄 艳:黑龙江省地震局,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 汶川地震持时方向性地震动Wenchuan Earthquake Duration Directivity Ground Motion
摘要: 基于目前常用的几种地震动持时定义,利用汶川地震中由中国数字强震动台网记录的地面运动加速度时程,分析并比较了不同定义下地震动持时的统计结果,结果表明,此次地震引起的地震动具有较长持时特点,且不同持时定义给出的统计结果存在较大差异,同一台站,绝对强震持时最长,而70%能量持时最短。此外,利用破裂前后方典型强震动台站加速度记录,重点分析了地震动持时的方向性分布特征,结果显示,破裂前方的地震动加速度时程持时随震中距无明显变化趋势,而破裂后方的持时随震中距增加而不断增加,且破裂前方的持时明显小于破裂后方的持时。本文结果可为地震动持续时间对结构地震反应影响的研究提供参考。
Abstract: Based on several commonly used definitions of ground motion duration, the statistical results of ground motion duration under different definitions are analyzed and compared by using strong motion acceleration data recorded by China Earthquake Network Center in Wenchuan Earthquake. The results show that the ground motion induced by this earthquake has long duration characteristics, and the statistical results given by different definitions of ground motion duration are quite different. On the other hand, at the same station, absolute strong earthquake duration is the longest and 70% energy duration is the shortest. In addition, using the acceleration records of typical strong motion stations forward and backward rupture, the directional characteristics of ground motion duration are analyzed. The results show that the time duration of ground motion acceleration forward rupture has no obvious trend with the epicenter distance, while the time duration backward rupture increases with the epicenter distance, and the time duration forward rupture is obviously shorter than that behind rupture. The results of this paper can be useful for the study of the influence of the ground motion duration on the seismic response of structures.
文章引用:马小燕, 周正华, 黄艳. 汶川地震地震动持时特性分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(5): 390-397. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.95044

参考文献

[1] 李小军, 周正华, 于海英, 等. 汶川8.0级地震强震动观测及记录初步分析[C]//汶川地震建筑震害调查与灾后重建分析报告, 2008: 1-6.
[2] 周正华, 温瑞智, 王玉石, 等. 地震宏观震害调查的几点建议[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2008, 3(3): 266-270.
[3] 清华大学土木工程结构专家组, 西南交通大学土木工程结构专家组, 北京交通大学土木工程结构专家组, 等. 汶川地震建筑震害分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(4): 1-9.
[4] 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 叶建青, 等. 汶川Ms 8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(3): 597-630.
[5] 卢书楠, 翟长海, 谢礼立. 汶川地震中强震持时的特征研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(2): 1000-1301.
[6] 滕吉文, 白登海, 杨辉, 等. 2008汶川Ms 8.0地震发生的深层过程和动力学响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(5): 1385-1402.
[7] Bolt, B.A. (1973) Duration of Strong Ground Motion. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on. Earthquake Engineering, 6, 1304-1313.
[8] Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G. (1975) A Study on the Duration of Strong Earthquake Ground Motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65, 581-626.
[9] 谢礼立, 张晓志. 地震动记录持时与工程持时[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1988, 8(1): 31-38.
[10] 谢礼立, 周雍年. 一个新的地震动持续时间定义[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1984, 4(2): 27-35.
[11] 于海英, 王栋, 杨永强, 等. 汶川8.0级地震强震动加速度记录的初步分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2009, 29(1): 1-13.