中外MOOCs文献比较研究
Comparative Study of Chinese and Foreign MOOCs Literature
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2019.93064, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 吴 冰*, 吴灿灿:同济大学经济与管理学院,上海
关键词: MOOCs比较分析定量分析关键词词频共现词频MOOCs Comparative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Keywords Word Frequency Co-Occurrence Word Frequency
摘要: 大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs, Massive Open Online Courses)关系到国家教育发展的战略资源,但目前全面分析中外文献,采用定量方法探讨MOOC研究主题和发展趋势的文献尚缺乏。因此,本研究选取WOS核心数据库(SCI和SSCI)和中文社会科学引文数据库(CSSI),采用定量分析方法对2013年至2018年发表的中外MOOCs研究文献进行深入探索,首先,分析比较中外文献出版年份、出版期刊、出版机构、学科类别和资助项目;其次,利用CiteSpace分别统计比较了中外文献关键词词频、关键词热点演变和研究主题聚类,利用R分别统计比较了中外文献关键词共现词频;最后,总结中外MOOCs研究的发展现状,明确提出了未来的研究方向,旨在提供更深层次的MOOCs理解。
Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are related to the strategic resources of national education development. However, there is still a lack of literature that comprehensively analyses the domestic and foreign literature and uses quantitative methods to explore the research topics and development trends of MOOCs. Therefore, this study chooses WOS core database (SCI and SSCI) and Chinese Social Science Citation Database (CSSI) to explore the research literature of MOOCs published in China and foreign countries from 2013 to 2018 by bibliometric analysis. Firstly, this study makes a comparative analysis of the years of publication, periodicals, publishing institutions, subject categories and funding projects of Chinese and foreign literature; secondly, this study uses CiteSpace to make statistics on the frequency of keywords in Chinese and foreign literature, the evolution of keyword hotspots and the clustering of research topics respectively. The co-occurrence frequency of keywords in Chinese and foreign literature is counted by R. Finally, the development status of MOOCs research in China and foreign countries is summarized, and the future research directions are clearly put forward in order to provide a deeper understanding of MOOCs.
文章引用:吴冰, 吴灿灿. 中外MOOCs文献比较研究[J]. 教育进展, 2019, 9(3): 375-387. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2019.93064

参考文献

[1] Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[2] 康叶钦. 在线教育的后MOOC时代——SPOC解析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2014, 35(1):85-93.
[3] 王颖, 张金磊, 张宝辉. 大规模网络开放课程(MOOC)典型项目特征分析及启示[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2013(4): 67-75.
[4] 高地. MOOC热的冷思考——国际上对MOOCs课程教学六大问题的审思[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2014(2): 39-47.
[5] 韩锡斌, 葛文双, 周潜, 程建钢. MOOC平台与典型网络教学平台的比较研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2014(1): 61-68.
[6] 王萍. 大规模在线开放课程的新发展与应用: 从cMOOC到xMOOC[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2013(3): 13-19.
[7] 陈肖庚, 王顶明. MOOC的发展历程与主要特征分析[J]. 现代教育技术, 2013, 23(11): 5-10.
[8] 贺斌, 曹阳. SPOC:基于MOOC的教学流程创新[J]. 中国电化教育, 2015(3): 22-29.
[9] 顾小清, 胡艺龄, 蔡慧英. MOOCs的本土化诉求及其应对[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2013(5): 3-11.
[10] 秦鸿. MOOCs的兴起及图书馆的角色[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 19-26.
[11] 罗博. 大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)与高校图书馆角色研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(3): 130-136.
[12] 钱小龙, 黄蓓蓓. 基于MOOC平台的优质教育资源关键活动解析: 以加州大学欧文分校为例[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2018(1): 66-74.
[13] 史慧姗, 郑燕林, 马芸. MOOC论坛教师参与度对学生参与的影响研究[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2017(6): 47-56.
[14] 孙田琳子, 沈书生. 影响MOOC学习者持续学习的原因分析——基于CNKI 2011-2016实证研究的综述[J]. 中国远程教育, 2017(10): 55-62.
[15] 徐振国, 张冠文, 石林, 安晶. MOOC学习者辍学行为的影响因素研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2017(9): 100-106.
[16] 魏巧玲, 李欣, 姚玉梅. 基于MOOC的高校信息素养教育课程体系构建初探[J]. 情报探索, 2018(4): 92-95.
[17] Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A. and Williams, S.A. (2013) MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 202-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Jordan, K. (2014) Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 133-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Margaryan, A., Bianco, M. and Littlejohn, A. (2015) Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Hew, K.F. and Cheung, W.S. (2014) Students’ and Instructors’ Use of Mas-sive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Motivations and Challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Reich, J. (2015) Rebooting MOOC Research. Science, 347, 34-35.
[22] Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E. and Kummerfeld, B. (2013) MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28, 70-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Alraimi, K.M., Zo, H. and Ciganek, A.P. (2015) Understanding the MOOCs Continuance: The Role of Openness and Reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S. and Siemens, G. (2014) Where is Research on Massive Open Online Courses Headed? A Data Analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 134-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] DeBoer, J., Ho, A.D., Stump, G.S. and Breslow, L. (2014) Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open Online Courses. Educational Researcher, 43, 74-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Wu, B. and Chen X.H. (2017) Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs: Integrat-ing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Costello, E., Brown, M., Mhichíl, M.N.G. and Zhang, J.J. (2018) Big Course Small Talk: Twitter and MOOCs—A Systematic Review of Research Designs 2011-2017. International Journal of Educational Tech-nology in Higher Education, 15, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Costello, E., Holland, J. and Kirwan, C. (2018) The Future of Online Testing and Assessment: Question Quality in MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Moreno-Marcos, P.M., Munoz-Merino, P.J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres I. and Kloos, C.D. (2018) Analysing the Predictive Power for Anticipating Assignment Grades in a Massive Open Online Course. Be-havior & Information Technology, 37, 1021-1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Sablina, S., Kapliy, N., Trusevich, A. and Kostikova, S. (2018) How MOOC-Takers Estimate Learning Success: Retrospective Reflection of Perceived Bene-fits. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 21-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Van den Beemt, A., Buys, J. and van der Aalst, W. (2018) Analysing Structured Learning Behaviour in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): An Approach Based on Process Mining and Clustering. Internation-al Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 37-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] 陈扬森, 陈军. 基于关键词共现与社会网络分析法的国内外社交媒体研究热点分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017(3), 45-55.
[33] 吉亚力, 田文静, 董颖. 基于关键词共现和社会网络分析法的我国智库热点主题研究[J]. 情报科学, 2015, 33(3): 108-111.
[34] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 胡志刚, 王贤文. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[35] 冯帮, 邓心仪. 五年来国内教育智库研究的热点、趋势及展望——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2018(1): 19-24.