社会认知的两个基本维度与自尊关系的研究综述
A Review of the Relationship between Two Basic Dimensions of Social Cognition and Self-Esteem
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.96119, PDF,   
作者: 彭馨媛:华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海
关键词: 社会认知能动性社交性自尊Social Cognition Agency Communion Self-Esteem
摘要: 目前使用较多的社会认知基本维度是能动性和社交性,二者涵盖了人类的两种基本特质:能力和热情,反映了社会生活中的两个核心挑战。对于能动性、社交性与自尊关系的探究目前还处于逐步深入的阶段,尽管国内国外发现了许多不一致的结果,三者的关系也受到文化背景、年龄、性别等多种因素的作用,大部分研究者仍然认为能动性对自尊有更显著的预测和影响作用。目前国内对能动性–社交性与自尊关系的研究较为欠缺,在该类本土化过程中应注意文化普适性和命名方式的问题,道德也可能是社会认知中的重要组成成分。
Abstract: The most commonly used basic dimensions of social cognition are agency and communion, which cover two basic characteristics of human beings: ability and enthusiasm, reflecting two core challenges in social life. The research on the relationship between agency-communion and self-esteem is still in the stage of gradual deepening. Although many inconsistent results have been found, and the relationship among the three factors is also affected by cultural background, age, gender and other factors, most researchers still believe that agency has a more significant prediction and influence on self-esteem. At present, there is a lack of research on the relationship between agency-communion and self-esteem in China. In the process of such localization, cultural universality and naming should be noted. Morality may also be an important component of social cognition.
文章引用:彭馨媛 (2019). 社会认知的两个基本维度与自尊关系的研究综述. 心理学进展, 9(6), 971-977. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.96119

参考文献

[1] 代涛涛, 佐斌, 温芳芳(2014). 社会认知中热情与能力的补偿效应. 心理科学进展, 22(3), 502-511.
[2] 田录梅, 李双(2005). 自尊概念辨析. 心理学探新, 25(2), 26-29.
[3] 吴师, 任曦, 姜珂, 杜杰, 杨娟(2017). 自我知觉视角和元知觉视角下能动性评价对自尊的预测作用. 心理科学, No. 6, 1456-1463.
[4] Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self versus Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bakan, D. (1968). The Duality of Human Existence. Review of Religious Research, 10, 122.[CrossRef
[6] Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Bi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating Your Masculine Side: Agentic Traits Generally Dominate Self-Evaluation, Even in China. Social Psychology, 44, 103.[CrossRef
[8] Bialobrzeska, O., Parzuchowski, M., Studzinska, A., Baryla, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2018). Propensity to Take the Agent Perspective Moderates the Relative Importance of Agency versus Communion in Self-Esteem (But Only Slightly). Personality & Individual Differences, 126, 71-77.[CrossRef
[9] Bialobrzeska, O., Parzuchowski, M., & Wojciszke, B. (2019). Manipulated Taking the Agent versus the Recipient Perspective Seems Not to Affect the Relationship between Agency-Communion and Self-Esteem: A Small-Scale Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 14, e0213183.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Blackburn, R., Renwick, S. J. D., Donnelly, J. P., & Logan, C. (2004). Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate Factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire. Personality & Individual Differences, 37, 957-970.[CrossRef
[11] Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2012). You Want to Give a Good Impression? Be Honest! Moral Traits Dominate Group Impression Formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149-166.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for Honesty: The Primary Role of Morality (vs. Sociability and Competence) in Information Gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.[CrossRef
[13] Brown, J. D. (1996). Self-Esteem: Research, Theory, and Practice. Contemporary Psychology, 41, 1109-1109.[CrossRef
[14] Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E. A., & Sedikides, C. (2002). Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Positivity of Self-Views: Two Portraits of Self-Love. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358-368.[CrossRef
[15] Chen, F., Zhu, S., & Bi, C. (2017). The Development of Self-Esteem and the Role of Agency and Communion: A Longitudinal Study among Chinese. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 27, 816-824.
[16] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gebauer, J. E., Wagner, J., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W. (2013). Agency-Communion and Self-Esteem Relations Are Moderated by Culture, Religiosity, Age, and Sex: Evidence for the “Self-Centrality Breeds Self-Enhancement” Principle. Journal of Personality, 81, 261.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] James, W. (1923). The Principles of Psychology (p. 761). New York: Dover Books on Philosophy & Psychology.[CrossRef
[20] Jiang, K., Wu, S., Shi, Z., Liu, M., Peng, M., Shen, Y., & Yang, J. (2018). Activations of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Thalamus during Agentic Self-Evaluation Are Negatively Asso-ciated with Trait Self-Esteem. Brain Research, 1692, 134-141.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public Opinion and Political Action.
[22] Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the Sociometer: The Relationship between Interpersonal Appraisals and State Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290-1299.[CrossRef
[23] Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-Esteem as an Interpersonal Monitor: The Sociometer Hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 270-274.[CrossRef
[24] Reeder, G. D., Pryor, J. B., & Wojciszke, B. (1992). Trait-Behavior Relations in Social Information Processing. In G. R. Semin, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, Interaction and Social Cognition (pp. 37-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[25] Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural Representations of Implicit Personality Theory 1. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297.[CrossRef
[26] Rosenkrantz, P., Bee, H., Vogel, S., & Broverman, I. (1968). Sex-Role Stereotypes and Self-Concepts in College Students. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 32, 287.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The Psychology of Self-Defense: Self-Affirmation Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 183-242.[CrossRef
[28] Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Wang, Y., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). A Cross-Cultural and Developmental Analysis of Self-Esteem in Chinese and Western Children. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 4, 253-271.[CrossRef
[30] Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and Communion as Conceptual Coordinates for the Understanding and Measurement of Interpersonal Behavior. In D. Cicchetti, & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking Clearly about Psychology: Essays in Honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 1. Matters of Public Interest; Vol. 2. Personality and Psychopathology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
[31] Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-Esteem Is Dominated by Agentic over Communal Information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617-627.[CrossRef
[32] Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263.[CrossRef
[33] Wojciszke, B., & Bialobrzeska, O. (2014). Agency versus Communion as Predictors of Self-Esteem: Searching for the Role of Culture and Self-Construal. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45, 469-479.[CrossRef
[34] Ybarra, O., Chan, E., & Park, D. (2001). Young and Old Adults’ Concerns about Morality and Competence. Motivation & Emotion, 25, 85-100.[CrossRef
[35] Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s Recurring Challenges and the Fundamental Dimensions: An Integration and Its Implications for Cultural Differences and Similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083-1092.[CrossRef