社交焦虑大学生对他人意图的解释

The Understanding of Other People’s Intentions in College Students with Social Anxiety

摘要: 目的：考察不同社交焦虑水平大学生对他人的意图的理解是否存在延时和即时解释偏向。方法：53名大学生完成所有的测试，其中高社交焦虑被试30名，低社交焦虑被试23名。采用意图评价量表来测量被试对模糊社交情景的延时解释偏向，E-prime反应时实验任务来测量被试即时解释偏向。结论：不同社交焦虑水平的大学生在模糊社交情境下对他人意图的延时解释(ps > 0.05)和即时解释(t = 1.07，p > 0.05)均不存在显著差异。高社交焦虑大学生的解释偏向存在性别差异，在延时解释中，女生对模糊社交情景的敌意解释显著比男生多(t = −2.35，p < 0.01)，女生的友好解释显著比男生少(t = 2.15，p < 0.05)；在即时解释中，高社交焦虑女生对友好意图(t = −2.14，p < 0.05)、敌意意图的反应比男生快(t = −4.16，p < 0.01)，但是对模糊图片的意图解释无性别差异(ps < 0.05)。

Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of the delay interpretation and the instant interpretation among college students with different levels of social anxiety in ambiguous social scenarios. Methods: 53 college students completed all the tests, including 30 subjects with high social anxiety and 23 subjects with low social anxiety. The Intention Assessment Scale was used to measure the delayed interpretation bias and E-prime procedure was used to measure the instant interpretation bias. Results: There were no significant differences of delayed interpretation (ps > 0.05) and immediate interpretation (t = 1.07, p > 0.05) among college students with different levels of social anxiety in ambiguous social scenarios. There are gender differences of the interpretation bias in college students with high social anxiety. In the delayed interpretation, female students had significantly more hostile interpretation for ambiguous social scenarios than male students (t = −2.35, p < 0.01), while female students had significantly fewer friendly interpretation than male students (t = 2.15, p < 0.05). In instant interpretation, girls with high social anxiety responded faster to friendly intentions (t = −2.14, p < 0.05) and hostile intentions than boys (t = −4.16, p < 0.01), but there was no gender difference of ambiguous intention pictures (ps < 0.05).