语言学学术话语的人文主义与科学精神偏向性研究
A Study on the Tendency of Humanism and Scientific Spirit in Linguistic Academic Discourse
摘要: 本文自建人文类代表性学科历史学、理工类代表性学科计算机科学、以及语言学学术话语语料库，应用多维分析方法，通过探索语言学学术话语语言表达特征，研究其在人文主义和科学精神上的偏向性。研究发现，近十年来，语言学学术话语主要呈现人文主义表达特质，且逐步注入理工类学科研究的表达方式。本研究有助于国内语言学工作者在论文写作中，明晰语言学学术话语语言特征，从而构建与国际接轨的学术话语风格，在国际上发出强有力的学术声音。
Abstract: In this paper, a corpus of academic discourse is built, including three kinds of subjects: history, computer science and linguistics, in which history represents humanism, and computer science stands for science-engineering disciplines. By multidimensional analysis, the language expression characteristics of linguistics in academic discourse were investigated to find its tendency of humanism and scientific spirit. It is found that in the past ten years, the linguistic academic discourse has been characterized by humanism, and has gradually infused the expression methods of science and engineer. This study is helpful for domestic linguists to clarify the language features of linguistic academic discourse, so as to construct an international academic discourse style and make a strong voice in the international arena.
文章引用：王霄. 语言学学术话语的人文主义与科学精神偏向性研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2019, 7(3): 320-328. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2019.73044

参考文献

[1] 陈勇. 科学精神与人文精神关系探悉[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 1997, 13(1): 22-27.
[2] 李醒民. 知识的三大部类: 自然科学、社会科学和人文学科[J]. 学术界, 2012, 171(8): 5-33.
[3] 罗左毅. 结构功能语言研究方法论的人文主义取向[J]. 广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2000, 22(4): 94-99.
[4] 朱晓农. 方法: 语言学的灵魂[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[5] Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. CUP, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 王立非, 部寒. 中美企业话语的功能特征多维对比研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2018, 41(2): 96-103.
[7] 江进林, 许家金. 基于语料库的商务英语语域特征多维分析[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(2): 225-236.
[8] Al-Surmi, M. (2012) Authenticity and TV Shows: A Multidimensional Analysis Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 671-694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Monaco, L.M. (2016) Was Late Modern English Scientific Writing Impersonal? Comparing Philosophy and Life Sciences Texts from the Coruna Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21, 499-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Crosthwaite, P. (2016) A Longitudinal Multidimensional Analysis of EAP Writing: Determining EAP Course Effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Friginal, E. and Weigle, S. (2014) Exploring Multiple Profiles of L2 Writing Using Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 潘璠. 中国非英语专业本科生和研究生书面语体的多特征多维度调查[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2012, 44(2): 220-232+320.
[13] Weigle, S.C. and Friginal, E. (2015) Linguistic Dimensions of Impromptu Test Essays Compared with Successful Student Disciplinary writing: Effects of Language Background, Topic, and L2 Proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 18, 25-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 张一宁, 孙彩慧, 李晔. 中外语言类期刊高被引论文英文摘要语言特征多维分析[J]. 外语电化教学, 2018, 182(4): 64-71.
[15] Nini, A. (2015) Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (Version 1.3). https://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger
[16] Biber, D. (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation. CUP, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Van Bonn, S. and Swales, J.M. (2007) English and French Journal Abstracts in the Language Sciences: Three Exploratory Studies. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 6, 93-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]