多层普通稠油藏火驱中的能量分析
Energy Analysis of Fire Flooding for Multi-Layer Conventional Heavy Oil Reservoirs
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.96056, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 孙洪军:中国石油辽河油田分公司,辽宁 盘锦;国家能源稠(重)油开采研发中心,辽宁 盘锦
关键词: 火驱油层压力能量分析薄互层普通稠油藏杜66块Fire Flooding Reservoir Pressure Energy Analysis Thin Interbedded Conventional Heavy Reservoir Block Du 66
摘要: 通过物理模拟实验和数值模拟计算,系统研究了互层状普通稠油藏蒸汽吞吐后期转火驱开发的能量状态和相关油藏工程问题。研究表明:转火驱后,渗透率高的主力层吸气比例高,易形成火线,造成局部温度升高、压力升高,燃烧状态符合高温氧化生产特征;渗透率较低的非主力层吸气量较小,燃烧状态符合低温氧化特征。低温氧化也产生较多热量,能使油层温度升高,稠油粘度降低。油层压力和油层温度是影响火驱产量的最重要的两个因素,本次研究获得了普通稠油藏火驱中压力对产量的贡献值,研究结果与现场火驱动态相符,为火驱扩大实施提供了理论指导。
Abstract: This paper systematically addresses the energy state and related reservoir engineering problems of converting to fire flooding in the late stage of CSS for interbedded conventional heavy reservoirs through physical modeling and numerical simulation. The research shows that after converting to fire flooding, the principal layer with high permeability takes in more air and is likely to form a combustion front, causing the increasing of local temperature and pressure, complying with the production characteristics of high temperature oxidation; while the non-principal layer with low permeability takes in less air and its combustion state complies with the characteristics of low temperature oxidation. Low temperature oxidation also produces much heat, thereby raised reservoir temperature and reduced oil viscosity. Reservoir pressure and temperature are two most important factors affecting the oil production of fire flooding. This study understands the contribution of pressure to production in fire flooding for conventional heavy oil reservoirs. The results are consistent with the in-situ combustion performance, and provide theoretical guidance for the expansion of fire flooding.
文章引用:孙洪军. 多层普通稠油藏火驱中的能量分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(6): 518-528. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.96056

参考文献

[1] 岳清山, 王艳辉. 火驱采油方法的应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000: 16-18.
[2] 张方礼. 火烧油层技术综述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2011, 18(6): 1-5.
[3] 刘其成, 程海清, 张勇, 等. 火烧油层物理模拟相似原理研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(1): 111-114.
[4] 张方礼, 刘其成, 赵庆辉, 等. 火烧油层燃烧反应数学模型研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(5): 56-59.
[5] 关文龙, 马德胜, 梁金中, 等. 火驱储集层区带特征实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 100-104, 109.
[6] 户昶昊. 深层稠油油藏多层火驱关键参数优化设计研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(6): 56-60.
[7] 李秋, 易雷浩, 唐君实, 等. 火驱油墙形成机理及影响因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 118-125.
[8] 席长丰, 关文龙, 蒋有伟, 等. 注蒸汽后稠油油藏火驱跟踪数值模拟技术——以新疆H1块火驱试验区为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(6): 715-721.
[9] Turta, A.T., Chattopadhyay, S.K., Bhattacharya, R.N., et al. (2007) Current Status of Commercial in Situ Combustion Projects Worldwide. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 46, 8-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 黄继红, 关文龙, 席长丰, 等. 注蒸汽后油藏火驱见效初期生产特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(5): 517-520.
[11] 关文龙, 王世虎, 曹钧合, 等. 郑408块火驱物理模拟结果与模型解析解差异分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(1): 87-89.
[12] 关文龙, 席长丰, 陈亚平, 等. 稠油油藏注蒸汽开发后期转火驱技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(4): 452-462.