C类人格障碍倾向大学生的权变性自尊研究
Contingent Self-Esteem of Cluster-C Personality Disorders Positive College Students
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.96141, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 林玉凤, 卢 宁：深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心，广东 深圳
关键词: C类人格障碍；权变性自尊；整体权变自尊；领域权变自尊；Cluster-C Personality Disorders； Contingent Self-Esteem； Contingent Self-Esteem； Contingencies of Self-Worth
摘要: 目的：探索权变性自尊在C类人格障碍及其自尊系统中的作用和角色。方法：采用人格障碍筛查问卷(PDQC)、权变性自尊量表(CSS)、自我价值权变性量表(CSWS)、Rosenberg自尊量表(RSES)及IAT内隐自尊测量程序进行测量。结果：C类人格障碍倾向组与无人格障碍倾向组在整体权变自尊分数(p < 0.01)、他人认同(p < 0.001)、竞争(p < 0.05)、外表(p < 0.05)及学术能力(p < 0.01)等领域权变自尊均存在显著差异。外显自尊与C类人格障碍得分存在具有统计学意义的负相关(p < 0.01)，而整体权变自尊(p < 0.01)及竞争(p < 0.01)等领域权变自尊均与其呈显著正相关。整体权变自尊、他人认同领域权变自尊分别在外显自尊及C类人格障碍倾向间起完全中介作用；外表领域权变自尊在外显自尊及C类人格障碍倾向间起部分中介作用；中介效应占总效应之比分别为47.82%、52.17%、21.74%。结论：整体权变自尊及竞争、外表、学术、他人认同等领域权变自尊越高，C类人格障碍倾向越高。外显自尊通过整体权变自尊、他人认同领域权变自尊影响C类人格障碍倾向；外显自尊直接影响C类人格障碍倾向，同时通过外表领域权变性自尊影响C类人格障碍倾向。
Abstract: Objectives: To explore the relationship between Cluster-C Personality Disorders (PDs) and con-tingent self-esteem. Methods: First, 1000 Personality Disorder Questionnaires for CCMD-2-R (PDQC) were issued at a university in Guangdong Province. Then, using the Contingent Self-esteem Scale (CSS), the Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale (CSWS), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the IAT Measurement Program measured the contingent self-esteem, contingencies of self-worth, explicit self-esteem and implicit self-esteem of the 181 college students. Results: The contingent self-esteem score (p < 0.01) and others’ approval score (p < 0.001) of the Health Control (HC) were significantly lower than that of the Dependent Personality Disorder (DPD) positive group, the Avoidant Personality Disorder (APD) positive group, and the comorbid PD positive group. In addition, the HC and the Cluster-C PDs positive college students had significant differences at competencies, appearance, and academic ability. The relationships between cluster-C PD scores and contingent self-esteem (p < 0.01), competencies (p < 0.01), appearance (p < 0.05), academic ability (p < 0.05), others’ approval (p < 0.01) were positive. Contingent self-esteem and others’ approval are completely mediating between explicit self-esteem and Cluster-C PDs scores; appearance plays a partial intermediary role between explicit self-esteem and Cluster-C PDs score. Mediating effect accounts for total effect were 47.82%, 52.17%, and 21.74%, respectively. Conclusions: College students with high contingent self-esteem, competencies, appearance, academic ability or others’ approval are more likely to have Cluster-C PDs symptoms. Others’ approval and contingent self-esteem fully mediated the association between explicit self-esteem and Cluster-C PDs scores, respectively. Appearance partially mediated the association between explicit self-esteem and Cluster-C PDs scores.
文章引用：林玉凤, 卢宁 (2019). C类人格障碍倾向大学生的权变性自尊研究. 心理学进展, 9(6), 1141-1150. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.96141

参考文献

[1] 蔡华俭(2002). 内隐自尊的作用机制及特性研究. 博士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[2] 付文青, 阙墨春, 孔明, 赵幸福, 王杏云, 郭玲玲, 等(2008). 劳教吸毒人员人格障碍阳性率调查. 苏州大学学报: 医学版, 28(5), 779-781.
[3] 金莹, 卢宁(2013a). C类人格障碍倾向大学生的自尊异质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 220-223.
[4] 金莹, 卢宁(2013b). 人格障碍倾向大学生的自尊异质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(3), 422-425.
[5] 林玉凤, 卢宁(2018). 自尊异质性在心理一致感和c类人格障碍倾向间的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 61-65.
[6] 卢宁, 刘协和, 李智明, 张波, 谢聪(2001). CCMD-2-R诊断标准的人格障碍检测工具的编制及其信度效度检验——人格障碍检测工具系列研究Ⅲ. 中国心理卫生杂志, 15(2), 133-136.
[7] 王丹, 卢宁(2016). 自尊异质性在完美主义和c类人格障碍倾向间的中介效应研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, No. 6, 80-83+96.
[8] 王磊, 郑雪(2006). 自尊权变性的概念、性质和作用及其研究展望. 心理科学, 29(4), 1013-1015.
[9] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
[10] 杨晓慧(2011). 脆弱型高自尊个体的认知加工及其情感反应特点. 硕士论文, 宁波: 宁波大学.
[11] 叶刚, 姚方敏, 付文青, 孔明(2011). 回避型人格障碍大学生的自尊与情感. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25(2), 141-145.
[12] 翟书涛, 杨德森(1998). 人格形成与人格障碍. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社.
[13] 赵珊(2010). 大学生自我价值感及其领域权变性的相关因素研究. 硕士论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[14] Blom, V. (2011). Striving for Self-Esteem: Conceptualizations and Role in Burnout. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
https://doi.org /10.1037/e529822013-001
[15] Bosson, J. K., Brown, R. P., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Swann, W. B. (2003). Self-Enhancement Tendencies among People with High Explicit Self-Esteem: The Moderating Role of Implicit Self-Esteem. Self and Identity, 2, 169-187.
https://doi.org /10.1080/15298860309029
[16] Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the Perfect Measure of Implicit Self-Esteem: The Blind Men and the Elephant Revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
https://doi.org /10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631
[17] Crocker, J. (2013). Having and Pursuing Self-Esteem: Cost and Benefits (pp. 274-280). New York: Psychology Press.
[18] Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of Self-Worth. Psychological Review, 14, 200-203.
https://doi.org /10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00364.x
[19] Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., & Sommers, S. R. (2004). Contingencies of Self-Worth: Progress and Prospects. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 133-181.
https://doi.org /10.1080/10463280440000017
[20] Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of Self-Worth in College Students: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894-908.
https://doi.org /10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894
[21] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
https://doi.org /10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[22] Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 197-216.
https://doi.org /10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
[23] Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
https://doi.org /10.1177/0146167205275613
[24] Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
https://doi.org /10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
[25] Krizan, Z., & Suls, J. (2009). Implicit Self-Esteem in the Context of Trait Models of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 659-663.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.011
[26] Lupien, S. P., Seery, M. D., & Almonte, J. L. (2010). Discrepant and Congruent High Self-Esteem: Behavioral Self-Handicapping as a Preemptive Defensive Strategy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1105-1108.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.022
[27] Zeiglerhill, V. (2006). Discrepancies between Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem: Implications for Narcissism and Self-Esteem Instability. Journal of Personality, 74, 119-144.
https://doi.org /10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00371.x
[28] Zhao, X., Lynch, J., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206.
https://doi.org /10.1086/651257