内隐追随在组织中的研究与启示
Analysis of Researches on Implicit Followership Theories in Organization and Future Prospects
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.97155, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 许哲铭：电子科技大学公共管理学院，四川 成都
关键词: 内隐追随；组织行为；领导力；Implicit Followership Theories； Organizational Behavior； Leadership
摘要: 领导者对员工的期待影响着他们对员工的评价、态度与行为，并能对员工的工作绩效产生深远影响。这种主观期待又被称为内隐追随，是领导者心目中关于追随者特质和行为的认知图式。内隐追随对领导–成员交换关系、领导表现、员工工作满意度、工作绩效等都有着广泛的影响，对组织管理和团队发展都有着至关重要的意义。目前对内隐追随的研究尚存在一些不足，未来的研究可以从形成原因、跨文化研究、领导–员工关系相互作用等角度进行拓展。
Abstract: Leaders’ expectations of followers impacted their treatments and attitudes, which had a signifi-cant effect on followers’ job performance. These expectations were also called Implicit Followership Theories (IFTs), which referred to leaders’ cognitive schemas of followers' traits and behaviors. Consequently, IFTs had great influence on leader-member exchange relationship, leaders’ behaviors, employees’ job satisfaction and job performance, etc. Since the impacts of IFTs on both organizational management and team development were profound, it was of utmost importance to study the antecedents and outcomes of IFTs. However, there were some shortcomings in the research area of IFTs. Antecedents to IFTs, cross-culture studies and influence of the relationship between leaders and followers on IFTs should be investigated in the future.
文章引用：许哲铭 (2019). 内隐追随在组织中的研究与启示. 心理学进展, 9(7), 1260-1267. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.97155

参考文献

[1] 郭衍宏, 兰玲(2017). 中国情境下内隐追随理论的建构与测量. 中国人力资源开发, (7), 25-37.
[2] 孔茗, 钱小军(2015). 被领导者“看好”的员工其行为也一定好吗?——内隐追随对员工行为的影响. 心理学报, 47(9), 1162-1171.
[3] 彭坚, 冉雅璇, 康勇军, 韩雪亮(2016). 事必躬亲还是权力共享?——内隐追随理论视角下领导者授权行为研究. 心理科学, (5), 1197-1203.
[4] 彭坚, 王霄(2016). 与上司“心有灵犀”会让你的工作更出色吗?——追随原型一致性、工作投入与工作绩效. 心理学报, 48(9), 1151-1162.
[5] 彭坚, 王震(2018). 做上司的“意中人”: 负担还是赋能?追随原型-特质匹配的双刃剑效应. 心理学报, 50(2), 216-225.
[6] 赵李晶(2016). 领导者的内隐追随对员工建言行为的影响研究. 硕士学位论文. 南京: 南京财经大学.
[7] 祝振兵, 曹元坤, 彭坚(2017). 积极追随原型-特质匹配对辱虐管理的影响——基于多项式回归与响应面分析的探索. 心理科学, (6), 1405-1411.
[8] 祝振兵, 陈丽丽, 梁玉婷(2017). 内隐追随对员工创新行为的影响: 领导支持和内部动机的作用. 中国人力资源开发, (7), 16-24.
[9] 祝振兵, 罗文豪(2017). 中国组织情境下的内隐追随: 内容、结构与测量. 江西社会科学, (3), 235-244.
[10] 祝振兵, 罗文豪, 曹元坤(2017). 领导会视谁为圈内人?内隐追随与领导-成员交换关系研究. 科技进步与对策, 34(11), 140-146.
[11] Alipour, K. K., Mohammed, S., & Martinez, P. N. (2017). Incorporating Temporality into Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories: Exploring Inconsistencies between Time-Based Expectations and Actual Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 28, 300-316.[CrossRef] 
[12] Braun, S., Stegmann, S., Hernandez Bark, A. S., Junker, N. M., & Van Dick, R. (2017). Think Manager & Think Male, Think Follower & Think Female: Gender Bias in Implicit Followership Theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 377-388.[CrossRef] 
[13] Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & Mcgregor, R. (2010). Exploring Social Constructions of Followership: A Qualitative Study. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543-562.[CrossRef] 
[14] Derler, A., & Weibler, J. (2014). The Ideal Employee: Context and Leaders’ Implicit Follower Theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35, 386-409.[CrossRef] 
[15] Duong, J. (2012). Leaders’ Conceptions and Evaluations of Followers as Antecedents of Leadership Style, Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Outcomes. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72, 2984.
[16] Durbin, D. L., Darling, N., Steinberg, L., & Brown, B. B. (1993). Parenting Style and Peer Group Membership among European-American Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 87-100.[CrossRef] 
[17] Engle, E. M. (1997). Implicit Theories, Self-Schemas, and Leader-Member Exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 988-1010.[CrossRef] 
[18] Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability over Time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 293-310.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the Wild”: Taking Stock of Information-Processing Approaches to Leadership and Followership in Organizational Settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 858-881.[CrossRef] 
[20] Heslin, P. A., & Vandewalle, D. (2008). Managers’ Implicit Assumptions about Personnel. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 17, 219-223.[CrossRef] 
[21] Holzinger, A. I., & Medcof, A. T. (2006). Leader and Follower Prototypes in an International Context: An Exploratory Study of Asia and South America.
[22] House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding Cultures and Implicit Leadership Theories across the Globe: An Introduction to Project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 3-10.[CrossRef] 
[23] Jablin, F. M., & Krone, K. (1984). Characteristics of Rejection Letters and Their Effects on Job Applicants. Written Communication, 1, 387-406.[CrossRef] 
[24] Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Dick, R. V. (2016). The Ideal and the Counter-Ideal Follower—Advancing Implicit Followership Theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37, 1205-1222.[CrossRef] 
[25] Karakowsky, L., Degama, N., & Mcbey, K. (2012). Facilitating the Pygmalion Effect: The Overlooked Role of Subordinate Perceptions of the Leader. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 85, 579-599.[CrossRef] 
[26] Kedharnath, U. (2011). The Influence of Leaders’ Implicit Followership Theories on Employee Outcomes. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.[CrossRef] 
[27] Keller, T. (2003). Parental Images as a Guide to Leadership Sensemaking: An Attachment Perspective on Implicit Leadership Theories. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 141-160.[CrossRef] 
[28] Knoll, M., Schyns, B., & Petersen, L. E. (2017). How the Influence of Unethical Leaders on Followers Is Affected by Their Implicit Followership Theories. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24, 450-465.[CrossRef] 
[29] Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
[30] Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. New York: Routledge.
[31] Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (2002). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. New York: Routledge.[CrossRef] 
[32] Lord, R. G., & Shondrick, S. J. (2011). Leadership and Knowledge: Symbolic, Connectionist, and Embodied Perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 207-222.[CrossRef] 
[33] Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Harvey, J. L. (2001). System Constraints on Leadership Perceptions, Behavior, and Influence: An Example of Connectionist Level Processes.
[34] Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual Constraints on Prototype Generation and Their Multilevel Consequences for Leadership Perceptions. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 311-338.[CrossRef] 
[35] Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & Vader, C. L. D. (1984). A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 34, 343-378.[CrossRef] 
[36] Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult Attachment Measures: A 25-Year Review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 419.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the Latent Structure of Job Performance Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 956-970.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Sy, T. (2010). What Do You Think of Followers? Examining the Content, Structure, and Consequences of Implicit Followership Theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 73-84.[CrossRef] 
[39] Sy, T., Jin, N. C., & Johnson, S. K. (2013). Reciprocal Interactions between Group Perceptions of Leader Charisma and Group Mood through Mood Contagion. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 463-476.[CrossRef] 
[40] Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. M. (2012). Advancing Relational Leadership Research: A Dialogue among Perspectives. IAP.
[41] Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders’ Conceptions of Followers: Implications for Naturally Occurring Pygmalion Effects. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 822-834.[CrossRef]