强启动子Psod对谷氨酸棒状杆菌pyc基因表达的影响
The Impact of Strong Promoter Psod on Pyc Gene Expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum
摘要: 为了获得L-苹果酸高产的谷氨酸棒状杆菌(C.glutamicum),通过基因编辑,在草酰乙酸回补途径的关键酶丙酮酸羧化酶基因(pyc)前面,敲入超氧化物歧化酶基因启动子(Psod),重组菌株命名为CZM03,通过强启动子Psod增强PYC酶活性,促进丙酮酸→草酰乙酸→苹果酸,利于苹果酸的生成。结果表明:与野生型C.glutamicum相比,重组菌株CZM03的PYC活性上调了约2.2倍;到平台期,两者的生长速率和最大生物量没有显著差异。这表明Psod强启动子的敲入,对菌的生长没有明显影响,但是PYC的酶活却有大幅度提高,这对于目的产物的积累是有利的。
Abstract: In order to obtain a strain with high yield of L-malic acid, the wild-type C. glutamicum was mod-ified with gene editing. The superoxide dismutase gene promoter (Psod) was inserted ahead of pyruvate carboxylase gene (pyc), a key gene in the oxaloacetate anaplerotic reaction, to promote the yield of L-malic acid in a flow of pyruvate to oxaloacetate, then to L-malic acid. This strain was named as CZM03. The experimental results showed that the PYC activity was upregulated about 2.2-fold in CZM03 compared with the wild-type C. glutamicum. There was no significant difference in the growth rate and the maximum biomass at the plateau stage between the two strains. This indicates that the knock-in of the Psod promoter had no significant effect on the growth of the bacteria, but the activity of PYC increased significantly, which was beneficial to the accumulation of the target products.
文章引用:邹志成, 蒋佳稀, 丁俊辉, 乔宝艺, 曹懿佳, 周卫, 陈俊. 强启动子Psod对谷氨酸棒状杆菌pyc基因表达的影响[J]. 微生物前沿, 2019, 8(3): 103-109. https://doi.org/10.12677/AMB.2019.83013

参考文献

[1] Knuf, C., Nookaew, I., Remmers, I., et al. (2014) Physiological Characterization of the High Malic Acid Producing Aspergillus oryzae Strain 2103a-68. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 3517-3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Zelle, R.M., De Hulster, E., Van Winden, W.A., et al. (2008) Malic Acid Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Engineering of Pyruvate Carboxylation, Oxaloacetate Reduction, and Malate Export. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 74, 2766-2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhang, T., Ge, C., Deng, L., et al. (2015) C4-Dicarboxylic Acid Production by Overexpressing the Reductive TCA Pathway. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362, pii: fnv052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] McCulloch, M., McFarland, S., Berry, A., et al. (2013) Metabolic Engineering of Aspergillusoryzae NRRL 3488 for Increased Production of l-Malic Acid. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97, 8903-8912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Liu, J., Xie, Z., Shin, H.D., et al. (2017) Rewiring the Reductive Tricarboxylic Acid Pathway and L-Malate Transport Pathway of Aspergillus oryzae for Overproduction of L-Malate. Journal of Biotechnology, 253, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Heider, S.A. and Wendisch, V.F. (2015) Engineering Microbial Cell Factories: Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum with a Focus on Non-Natural Products. Biotechnology Journal, 10, 1170-1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kim, H.T., Baritugo, K.A., Oh, Y.H., et al. (2018) Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the High-Level Production of Cadaverineh. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 6, 5296-5305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kim, H.T., Khang, T.U., Baritugo, K.A., et al. (2019) Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the Production of Glutaric Acid, a C5 Dicarboxylic Acid Platform Chemical. Metabolic Engineering, 51, 99-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Liu, J., Li, J., Shin, H.D., et al. (2017) Protein and Metabolic Engineering for the Production of Organic Acids. Bioresource Technology, 239, 412-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Van der Rest, M., Lange, C. and Molenaar, D. (1999) A Heat Shock Following Electroporation Induces Highly Efficient Transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with Xenogeneic Plasmid DNA. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52, 541-545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 仇爱梅, 窦文芳, 李会, 等. 磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶基因的敲除对于谷氨酸棒杆菌V1生理代谢的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(9): 1215-1224.
[12] Kim, D.H., Lee, S.B. and Jeong, G.T. (2014) Production of Reducing Sugar from Enteromorpha intestinalis by Hydrothermal and Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 161, 348-353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]