2018年初冬成都市重污染事件气象条件分析
Analysis of Meteorological Conditions for Heavy Pollution Events in Chengdu in the Early Winter of 2018
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.97067, PDF,   
作者: 唐玉章, 许东蓓*, 苟玉清:成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都
关键词: 重污染气象条件逆温层温度平流Heavy Pollution Meteorological Conditions Inversion Layer Temperature Advection
摘要: 2018年12月11日~22日,成都地区发生了一次长达12天的重污染过程。本文利用中国生态环境部提供的成都市7个站点逐时环境监测资料、成都市温江气象站观测资料、怀俄明大学提供的温江站探空资料以及NOAA提供的2.5˚×2.5˚NCEP/NCAR再分析资料,对此次重污染过程的污染特征、污染气象参数特征、850hPa和925hPa水平风速特征、大气环流背景进行了分析。结果表明,细颗粒物是此次重污染过程的首要污染物,污染过程后期较前期严重;四川盆地高空维持平直西风或受脊前西北气流控制,导致垂直运动弱、低空出现暖平流使逆温层底部高度降低,因此限制了混合层高度,使大气环境容量减小、850hPa以下大气水平风速较小是污染物累积的三大关键因素;850hPa、925hPa等压面上水平风速对污染物的累积和清除具有很好的指示意义;此次重污染过程中15日有一次冷空气活动,但是持续时间短,并未改变静稳的大气层结,因此,重污染过程得以维持较长时间;21~22日高空极地冷涡引导冷空气南下,并配合地面冷高压从西方路径入侵成都,彻底改变低空静稳大气层结,是此次重污染过程结束的主要原因。
Abstract: From December 11 to 22, 2018, a heavy pollution process lasting for 12 days took place in Chengdu. Based on hourly environmental monitoring data from 7 sites in Chengdu, provided by Ministry of Ecological Environment of China, observation data of Wenjiang meteorological station in Chengdu, sounding data of Wenjiang station from University of Wyoming and 2.5˚ × 2.5˚ NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data, pollution characteristics, meteorological pollution parameters, wind speed characteristics of 850 hPa and 925 hPa and atmospheric circulation background in this process were analyzed. The results showed that fine particulate matter was the primary pollutant in the heavy pollution process, and the pollution was more serious in the later stage than in the earlier stage. There were 3 key factors for pollution accumulation. First, the upper air of Sichuan basin maintained a straight westerly wind or was controlled by the northwest airflow in front of the ridge, resulting in weak vertical movement. Second, low-level warm advection reduced the bottom height of the inversion layer, which limited the height of the mixing layer and reduced the atmospheric environmental capacity. Third, atmosphere under 850 hPa horizontal wind speed was small. The horizontal wind speed on the isobaric surface of 850 hPa and 925 hPa was a good indication for pollutant accumulation and diffusion. There was a weak cold front during the pollution weather process, but it was too weak to change stable atmospheric junction completely. Therefore, the pollution weather process lasted a long time. The main reason for the end of the heavy pollution process was that the upper polar cold vortex guided the cold air southward and coordinated with the surface anticyclone to invade Chengdu from the western path, completely changing the stable atmospheric junction of the lower atmosphere.
文章引用:唐玉章, 许东蓓, 苟玉清. 2018年初冬成都市重污染事件气象条件分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(7): 627-638. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.97067

参考文献

[1] 过宇飞, 刘端阳, 周彬, 等. 无锡市霾天气特征及影响因子研究[J]. 气象, 2013, 39(10): 1314-1324.
[2] 陈丽芳. 杭州市灰霾气候特征及与清洁过程的对比分析[J]. 科技通报, 2012, 28(7): 31⁃35.
[3] 吴兑, 廖国莲, 邓雪娇, 等. 珠江三角洲霾天气的近地层输送条件研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 2008, 19(1): 1-9.
[4] 颜玉倩, 朱克云, 张杰, 等. 成都地区春季一次持续性灰霾天气过程特征及预测[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 33-39.
[5] 周书华, 倪长健, 刘培川. 成都地区大气边界层逆温特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2015, 31(2): 108-111.
[6] 蒋维楣, 孙鉴泞, 曹文俊, 等. 空气污染气象学教程[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004.
[7] 吴兑. 关于霾与雾的区别和灰霾天气预警的讨论[J]. 气象, 2005, 31(4): 3-7.
[8] 胡亚旦, 周自江. 中国霾天气的气候特征分析[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(7): 73-78.
[9] 唐敬, 蔡旭晖, 康凌, 等. 复杂地形低风速气象特征分析[J]. 气象科学, 2011, 31(4): 542-547.
[10] 张琳娜, 郭锐. 2012年冬季北京三种高影响天气的关联与成因分析[J]. 气象, 2014, 40(5): 598-604.
[11] 李培荣, 向卫国. 四川盆地逆温层特征对空气污染的影响[J]. 成都信息工程大学学报, 2018, 33(2): 220-226.
[12] 王珊, 廖婷婷, 王莉莉, 等. 西安一次霾重污染过程大气环境特征及气象条件影响分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(11): 3452-3462.
[13] 赵娜, 马翠平, 李洋, 等. 河北重度污染天气分型及其气象条件特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(5): 839⁃846.
[14] 王艳琴. 环境保护部发布HJ633-2012《环境空气质量指数(AQI)技术规定(试行)》[J]. 中国标准导报, 2012(4): 49.
[15] 廖碧婷, 黄俊, 王春林, 等. 广州地区灰霾过程和清洁过程的边界层特征对比分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(12): 34-45.
[16] 但尚铭. Pasquill大气稳定度查算图及其制作方法[J]. 环境科学, 1988, 42(2): 78-80.
[17] 杜荣光, 齐冰, 郭惠惠, 等. 杭州市大气逆温特征及对空气污染物浓度的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2011, 27(4): 49-53.
[18] 赵晨曦, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 北京地区冬春PM2.5和PM10污染水平时空分布及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(2): 418-427.