秸秆还田对褐土水稳性团聚体特征及土壤化学性质的影响
Influence of Different Modes of Straw Return on Characteristics of Cinnamon Soil Water Stable Aggregates and Soil Properties
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2019.73029, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 朱志凡, 陈 冰, 张广娜*, 霍宪启, 于军香, 郑亚琴:临沂大学农林科学学院,山东 临沂;王 芸, 邓丁浩:临沂大学资源环境学院,山东 临沂
关键词: 还田方式褐土水稳性团聚体平均重量直径冗余分析Straw Return Modes Cinnamon Soil Water Stable Aggregates Mean Weight Diameter RDA Analysis
摘要: 为探讨不同玉米秸秆不同方式还田对褐土水稳性团聚体特征及土壤理化性状的影响,于处理4年后2017年6月采集对照不施肥(CK)、施肥(C)、20%秸秆覆盖(SM20)、20%秸秆还田(SR20)、20%秸秆灰分(SA20)和20%秸秆焚烧(SC20)处理0~10 cm层的原状土壤,通过室内筛分处理后,测定土壤水稳性团聚体特征及土壤化学性质。研究表明,除C处理外,水稳性团聚体分布从大到小依次为0.5~1 mm,<0.25 mm,0.25~0.5 mm,1~2 mm,>2 mm;SR20和SC20处理平均重量直径(MWD)最高;处理C、SR20和SC20显著增加>2 mm粒级团聚体含量;SM20、SR20和SC20处理显著增加1~2 mm粒级含量;各施肥处理显著降低0.5~1 mm粒级含量;施肥处理除SC20外,均显著增加0.25~0.5 mm粒级含量;仅C处理显著增加<0.25 mm粒级含量。冗余分析发现0.5~1 mm粒级水稳性团聚体含量、土壤有机质(OM)含量、有效磷(resin-P)含量、硝态氮(NO3--N)含量与主轴相关,可解释总变量的57.2%;土壤有效磷含量、土壤NO3--N含量与< 0.25 mm粒级团聚体含量呈正向相关;土壤NH4+-N含量、CaCO3含量与1~2 mm粒级团聚体含量和MWD呈正向相关。秸秆还田和秸秆焚烧4年后土壤水稳性团聚结构最稳定,秸秆焚烧处理土壤铵态氮和有效磷含量最高,各种秸秆方式还田均能维持较高的有效磷和硝态氮含量;冗余分析结果表明,不同粒级水稳性团聚体含量分布对土壤有效养分含量及团聚体的稳定性影响不一。
Abstract: The study researched on cinnamon soil in this area under different modes of straw return. Six treatments were set up as Control, (no fertilizer, no straw); C (chemical fertilizer input); Straw mulch (SM20, 20% of straw mulch with fertilizer); SR20 (20% straw return with fertilizer); SA20 (20% straw ash with fertilizer); Straw combustion (SC20, 20% of straw combustion with fertilizer), the treatments with chemical fertilizer were applied with the same amount. After 4 years of field experiment, 0 - 10 cm soil was collected for analysis of characteristics of cinnamon soil water stable aggregates, soil chemical properties, as well as RDA relationship between them. Results showed that, all treatments beside C, the proportion of different grades of water stable aggregates were trended as 0.5 - 1 mm, <0.25 mm, 0.25 - 0.5 mm, 1 - 2 mm, >2 mm from large to small; Treatments of C, SR20 and SC20 increased >2 mm aggregates significantly; SM20, SR20 and SC20 increased 1 - 2 mm aggregates significantly; Treatments with chemical fertilization reduced 0.5 - 1 mm aggregates; Fertilization treatments all increased 0.25 - 0.5 mm aggregates except SC20; Only C treatment could increase <0.25 mm aggregate. RDA analysis showed that 0.5 - 1 mm aggregate, soil organic matter content, soil resin-P and nitrate nitrogen concentration are related to axis 1, which explained 57.2% of total variable; Soil available P and NO3--N concentration are positively related with <0.25 mm aggregate; Soil   and CaCO3 contents positively related with 1 - 2 mm aggregate and mean weight diameter. Results indicated that 4 years of straw return and straw combustion had more stable aggregates than other treatments, high amount of soil NH4+-N and resin-P concentration were found in SC20 treatment, while all modes of straw input to soil could maintain more resin-P and NO3--N than control treatment. RDA analysis showed proportion of different soil aggregate grade influenced soil available nutrients contents and stable characteristics of water stable aggregate.
文章引用:朱志凡, 陈冰, 张广娜, 王芸, 霍宪启, 邓丁浩, 于军香, 郑亚琴. 秸秆还田对褐土水稳性团聚体特征及土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 土壤科学, 2019, 7(3): 233-241. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2019.73029

参考文献

[1] Lynch, J.M. and Bragg, E. (1985) Microorganisms and Soil Aggregate Stability. Advances in Soil Science, 2, 133-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Dexter, A.R. (1988) Advances in Characterization of Soil Structure. Soil and Tillage Research, 11, 199-238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Barral, M.T., Arias, M. and Guerif, J. (1998) Effects of Iron and Organic Matter on the Porosity and Structural Stability of Soil Aggregates. Soil and Tillage Research, 46, 261-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 朱冰冰, 李鹏, 李占斌, 等. 子午岭林区土地退化/恢复过程中土壤水稳定性团聚体的动态变化[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2008, 36(3): 124-134.
[5] Bakken, L.R. (1990) Microbial Growth and Immobilization/Minerlization of N in the Rhizosphere. Symbiosis, 9, 37-41.
[6] West, T.O. and Post, W.M. (2002) Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 1930-1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 毕明丽, 宇万太, 姜子绍, 等. 施肥和土壤管理对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(1): 32-42.
[8] 李书田, 金继运. 中国不同区域农田养分输入、输出与平衡[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4207-4229.
[9] 冀保毅, 赵亚丽, 郭海斌, 等. 深耕和秸秆还田对不同质地土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(3): 65-70.
[10] 安婉丽, 高灯州, 潘婷. 水稻秸秆还田对福州平原稻田土壤水稳性团聚体分布及稳定性影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(5): 1833-1840.
[11] 杨燕, 张学鹏, 宁堂原, 等. 套作及秸秆还田对西兰花连作田土壤团聚体分布的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S2): 85-93.
[12] 周虎, 吕贻忠, 杨志臣, 等. 保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(9): 1973-1979.
[13] Barreto, R.C., Masari, B.E., Maddock, J.E.L., et al. (2009) The Impact of Soil Management on Aggregation, Carbon Stabilization and Carbon Loss as CO2 in the Surface Layer of a Rhodic Ferralsol in Southern Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 132, 243-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 99-133.
[15] Sharpley, A. (2000) Bioavailable Phosphorus in Soil. In: Pierzynski, G.M., Ed., Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals and Waters, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 39-44.
[16] 王笃超, 吴景贵. 不同有机物料对连作大豆土壤养分及团聚体组成的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(4): 825-834.
[17] 吕欣欣, 丁雪丽, 张彬, 等. 长期定位施肥和地膜覆盖对棕壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳含量的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(1): 1-10.
[18] 隋雨含. 秸秆焚烧对土壤有机质及团聚体组成的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2015.
[19] Zhang, H., Xu, W., Li, Y., et al. (2017) Changes of Soil Microbial Communities during Decomposition of Straw Residues under Different Land Uses. Journal of Arid Land, 9, 666-677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 田国成, 王钰, 孙路, 等. 秸秆焚烧对土壤有机质和氮磷钾含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 387-393.
[21] 易姝, 赵展恒, 梁玉祥. 秸秆灰直接还田对土壤的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(4): 891-895.
[22] 丁文峰, 丁登山. 黄土高原植被破坏前后土壤团粒结构分形特征[J]. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 700-706.
[23] 宋洁, 李志洪, 赵小军, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤微团聚体特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5): 116-120.
[24] 王晓波, 车威, 纪荣婷, 等. 秸秆还田和保护性耕作对砂姜黑土有机质和氮素养分的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(3): 483-489.
[25] 李晓欣, 胡春胜, 程一松. 不同施肥处理对作物产量及土壤中硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2003, 21(3): 38-42.
[26] 闫德智, 王德建. 长期施用化肥和秸秆对活性有机质组分的影响[J]. 土壤, 2008, 40(3): 407-411.
[27] 隋雨含, 赵兰坡, 陈亮. 秸秆焚烧对土壤微团聚体及有机无机复合体组成的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2015, 37(4): 451-458.
[28] 潘根兴, 曹建华, 何师意, 等. 土壤碳作为湿润亚热带表层岩溶作用的动力机制: 系统碳库及碳转移特征[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1999, 22(3): 49-52.
[29] 何龙. 秸秆添加方式对黑钙土有机碳积累和CO2释放的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2014.
[30] 李忠徽, 魏彬萌, 刘丹, 等. 黄绵土中碳酸钙含量和有机肥施用对土壤有机碳组分及CO2排放的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(6): 2498-2505.