C类人格障碍倾向大学生反事实思维与自尊异质性的关系研究
The Relationship between Counterfactual Thinking and Heterogeneity of Self-Esteem in College Students Who Have the Symptoms of Cluster C Personality Disorders
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.97160, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 樊 斌, 卢 宁, 凌 瑛, 王 亚：深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心，广东 深圳
关键词: C类人格障碍大学生；反事实思维；自尊异质性；Cluster-C Personality Disorders； Counterfactual Thinking； The Heterogeneity of Self-Esteem
摘要: 目的：比较C类人格障碍倾向大学生与正常大学生之间自尊结构的差异，考察自尊在反事实思维对C类人格障碍检出影响中的中介作用，以期为C类人格障碍的病理心理机制提供解释角度。方法：通过人格障碍筛查问卷(PDQC-2)对广东省某大学1757名二年级学生进行施测，筛查人格障碍倾向个体；根据问卷施测后人格障碍阳性检出结果，通过邮件或电话邀请单一无共型的强迫型(36人)、焦虑/回避型(31人)、依赖型(14人)和对照组(52人)进行睡前反事实思维问卷、Rosenberg自尊量表、Marlowe-Crowne社会期望量表、条件自尊量表、不稳定自尊量表的问卷调查。结果：① C类人格障碍倾向组条件自尊和不稳定自尊得分高于对照组，C类各型人格障碍倾向大学生在各自尊的得分具有差异性；② 不稳定自尊和反事实思维可以预测C类人格障碍的检出；防御性自尊和反事实思维可以正向预测强迫型人格障碍的检出；外显自尊对焦虑/回避型人格障碍有负性预测作用，反事实思维对其有正向预测作用；③ 不稳定自尊在反事实思维与C类人格障碍检出之间起部分中介作用。结论：C类人格障碍倾向大学生自尊结构特点为自尊不稳定，条件化程度较高，且C类各型人格障碍倾向大学生的自尊结构具有异质性；不稳定自尊和反事实思维是C类人格障碍倾向的危险因子；反事实思维可以直接影响C类人格障碍检出，也可通过不稳定自尊影响C类人格障碍检出。
Abstract: Objectives: To explore the difference in self-esteem structure between Cluster C personality dis-orders students and normal students, and the mediator effect of self-esteem between counterfactual thinking and Cluster C personality disorders symptoms. The present study hopes to provide empirical evidences for clinical intervention to students with personality disorders. Methods: PDQC-2 (Personality Disorders Questionnaire for CCMD-2-R) was administered to a sample which consisted of 1757 students to screen personality disorders. The number of people with single Cluster C personality disorders was as follows: OBC-36, AVD-31 and DEP-14, and 52 normal subjects were invited to finish the questionnaires. The questionnaires contain 5 parts: BCPQ (Bedtime Counterfactual Processing Questionnaire), RSES (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), MCSD (Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale), CSES (Contingencies of Self-Esteem Scale) and ISES (Instability of Self-Esteem Scale). Results: 1) The scores of contingent self-esteem and instable self-esteem in the Cluster C personality disorders were higher than those in the control group. 2) Counterfactual thinking and instable self-esteem were the risk factors to all Cluster-C personality disorders. Counterfactual thinking and defensive self-esteem could positively predict OBC. Explicit self-esteem was a negative predictor for AVD, which was positively predicted by Counterfactual thinking. 3) Counterfactual thinking can effect upon Cluster C personality disorders via instable self-esteem. Conclusions: The structure of self-esteem of college students with Cluster C personality disorders is characterized by instable self-esteem and high degree of contingencies, and the structure of self-esteem of college students with all Cluster C personality disorders is heterogeneous. Instable self-esteem and counterfactual thinking are risk factors for Cluster C personality disorders. Counterfactual thinking can directly affect the detection of Cluster C personality disorders, and can also affect the detection of Cluster C personality disorders through instable self-esteem.
文章引用：樊斌, 卢宁, 凌瑛, 王亚 (2019). C类人格障碍倾向大学生反事实思维与自尊异质性的关系研究. 心理学进展, 9(7), 1298-1306. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.97160

参考文献

[1] 陈绍建, 温研, 刘键(1996). 大学生人格障碍和心理防御机制的关系. 心理发展与教育, (3), 45-48.
[2] 金莹, 卢宁(2013). C类人格障碍倾向大学生的自尊异质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 220-223.
[3] 历娜, 吕厚超(2016). 反事实思维与人格特质的关系研究综述. 内江师范学院学报, (12), 94-100.
[4] 林玉凤, 卢宁(2018). 自尊异质性在心理一致感和C类人格障碍倾向间的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 61-65.
[5] 刘红云, 骆方, 张玉, 等(2013). 因变量为等级变量的中介效应分析. 心理学报, 45(12), 1431-1442.
[6] 卢宁, 刘协和, 李智明, 等(2001). CCMD-2-R诊断标准的人格障碍检测工具的编制及其信度效度检验——人格障碍检测工具系列研究Ⅲ. 中国心理卫生杂志, 15(2), 133-136.
[7] 汪向东, 希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册. 中国心理卫生杂志, 13(1), 31-35.
[8] 王丹, 卢宁(2016). 自尊异质性在完美主义和C类人格障碍倾向间的中介效应研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, (6), 80-83+96.
[9] 魏娟娟, 冯正直(2009). 抑郁症状大学生对正、负性生活事件的反事实思维研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(2), 154-156.
[10] 吴明证, 梁宁建, 孙晓玲, 丁莹(2008). 自尊水平与自尊稳定性的关系: 完美主义的中介作用. 应用心理学, 14(4), 324-329.
[11] 中华医学会精神科分会(2001). 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(CCMD-3) (页126). 济南: 山东科学技术出版社.
[12] Christina, S., Ari, K., Leena, K. et al. (1999). Self-Evaluated Self-Esteem, Peer-Evaluated Self-Esteem, and Defensive Egotism as Predictors of Adolescents’ Participation in Bullying Situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1268-1278.[CrossRef] 
[13] Henri, C., Amelie, R., & Stacey, C. (2006). Preliminary Results of a Scale Assessing Instability of Self-Esteem. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 38, 136-141.[CrossRef] 
[14] Jessica, L. T., & Richard, W. R. (2003). Death of a (Narcissistic) Salesman: An Integrative Model of Fragile Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 57-62.
[15] Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.[CrossRef] 
[16] Morrison, D., & Gilbert, P. (2001). Social Rank, Shame and Anger in Primary and Secondary Psychopaths. Forensic Psychiatry, 12, 330-356.[CrossRef] 
[17] Paradise, A. W., & Kernis, M. H. (1999). Development of the Contingent Self-Esteem Scale. Unpublished Data, Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
[18] Schmidt, R. E., & Linden, M. V. (2009). The Aftermath of Rash Action: Sleep-Interfering Counterfactual Thoughts and Emotions. Emotion, 9, 549-553.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Virgil, Z., & Jennifer, A. (2006). Borderline Personality Features: Instability of Self-Esteem and Affect. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 668-687.[CrossRef]